Radiofrequency Ablation Using Cooled-Wet Electrode

March 17, 2021 updated by: Jeong Min Lee, Seoul National University Hospital

Switching Bipolar Radiofrequency Ablation Using Cooled-Wet Electrode for Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Preliminary Study

To determine safety, ablative zone, technical success rate and early safety data of recently introduced cool-wet electrode in eligible patients who are indicative for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for liver tumors.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

To determine safety, ablative zone, technical success rate and early safety data (12 months local tumor progression rate) of recently introduced cooled-wet electrode in eligible patients who are indicative for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for liver tumors in comparison with currently used separable clustered electrode in our institution. Owing to tissue cooling effect of internally cooled-wet electrode can be used in switching bipolar mode. Patients would be randomized into two groups (cool-wet electrode group and separable clustered electrode in switching monopolar mode). The results from this preliminary study would be used for main study to compare the efficacy and safety data between two electrodes in the future.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
77

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria: all conditions have to be fulfilled.

  • Diagnosed with HCC (1~5cm) according to AASLD guideline or LI-RADS on MDCT or liver MRI within 60 days before RFA
  • liver metastasis histologically confirmed or characteristic findings on cross-sectional imaging
  • signed informed consent
  • treatment naive index tumor (no history of local treatment for an index tumor)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • more than three tumors in a patients
  • tumor size larger than 5cm
  • tumor attaches to central portal vein or hepatic vein
  • Child-Pugh classification C
  • uncorrected coagulopathy
  • presence of extrahepatic metastases

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: RFA with cooled-wet electrode
RFA is performed using three cool-wet electrodes in switching bipolar mode under the fused US guidance.
Device: cooled-wet electrode
RFA is performed using three cooled-wet electrodes in switching bipolar mode. The electrode is anticipated to reduce tissue resistance by releasing small amount of saline during the procedure, which may lead larger ablative volume by delivering more RF energy.
Active Comparator: RFA with separable clustered electrode
RFA using separable clustered electrode in switching monopolar mode under the fused US guidance
Device: separable clustered electrode
RFA is performed using separable clustered electrode in switching monopolar mode.
Other Names:
  • Octopus(R)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
LTP
Time Frame: 24 months
cumulating local tumor progression rate over 2- year after RFA
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Technical success rate
Time Frame: 1 months
technical success rate on 1 month follow-up which indicates no residual tumor on cross-sectional imaging (CT, MRI)
1 months
IDR rate
Time Frame: 24 months
cumulating intrahepatic distant recurrence (IDR) rate over 2- year after RFA
24 months
EM rate
Time Frame: 24 months
cumulating extrahepatic metastasis (EM) rate over 2- year after RFA
24 months
Maximal diameter of ablative zone
Time Frame: 7 day
Maximal diameter of ablative zone on post-RFA CT or MRI in a mm.
7 day
ablation time
Time Frame: 1 day
RFA procedure time in each patient.
1 day
Complication
Time Frame: 12 months
all complication rate and grades (according to Clavien system from I to III) related with RFA procedure
12 months
Volume of ablative zone
Time Frame: 7 days
Volume of ablative zone on post-RFA CT or MRI in a mm3.
7 days

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
US/CT or MR fusion success rate
Time Frame: 1 day
RFA is performed under real time US guidance and US is fused with pre-RFA CT or MRI before ablation of the index tumor. US/CT or US/MR fusion quality is assessed by an operator.
1 day
Immediate assess of technique success rate
Time Frame: 2 days
After performing RFA, patients were transferred CT unit to confirm immediate technique success. It is performed in both a) visual inspection using pre-and post-RFA images side-by-side comparison and b) software assisted inspection which register pre-and post-RFA scans. The results would be used to perform additional treatment (2nd look RFA).
2 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Seoul National University Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
RF medical
Medical Research Collaborating Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 14, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 19, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 24, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 1, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 4, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 5, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 18, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 17, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SNUH-2013-2283

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HCC

Clinical Trials on cooled-wet electrode

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings