Imaging Biomarkers to Validate Response in Enzalutamide-Treated mCRPC

February 24, 2020 updated by: University of Wisconsin, Madison

Validation of Imaging-Based Biomarkers of Treatment Response in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated With Enzalutamide

To determine the feasibility and success rate of tumor tissue procurement using molecular-image-directed biopsies of responding and non-responding osseous metastases, measured by NaF PET/CT, in patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
7

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53705
        • University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Men ≥18 years with progressive, bone-metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer who will be treated with enzalutamide will be enrolled.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
  • Identifiable prostate cancer-related osseous metastases on bone scan or NaF PET/CT in the vertebral body, pelvis or other bone. Such lesions must be amenable to serial NaF PET/CT imaging. Preference will be given to subjects with multiple lesions that can be imaged in one image acquisition session to obtain maximal information as well as locations of lesions amenable to bone biopsies.
  • Patients must be starting enzalutamide for treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate, with cycle 1 day 1 occurring within 14 days after the first baseline NaF PET/CT. Subjects will be allowed to receive enzalutamide treatment on a concurrent study as long as the enzalutamide treatment study does not prohibit concurrent participation.
  • Men of all races and ethnic groups of age ≥18 years.
  • The effects of NaF on the developing human fetus are unknown. For this reason and because radiopharmaceuticals used for diagnostic imaging and other therapeutic agents and imaging procedures used in this trial may be or are known to be teratogenic, men must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control; abstinence) prior to study entry and for the duration of study participation. Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while her partner is participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately.
  • Patients must be able to comply with all study procedures, including having both the ability and willingness to lie flat for ≥ 30 minutes during imaging and undergo bone biopsies.
  • Patients must have both the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known bleeding diathesis or on therapeutic anticoagulants (warfarin, low-molecular heparin, heparin analogues) that would increase risk of complications from bone biopsies.
  • History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to sodium fluoride F-18 (NaF).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The percentage of biopsies obtained from NaF PET/CT- identified responding and non-responding bone metastases that contain tumor tissue from 30 patients
Time Frame: 12 weeks
To determine the feasibility and success rate of tumor tissue procurement using molecular-image-directed biopsies of responding and non-responding osseous metastases, measured by NaF PET/CT, in patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The number of known response molecular biomarkers obtained from responding lesions as identified using NaF PET/CT in 30 patients who have received 12 weeks of enzalutamide.
Time Frame: Within 2 weeks of week 12
To compare NaF PET/CT responding lesions to known response molecular biomarkers obtained from biopsy of responding lesions
Within 2 weeks of week 12
The number of patients whose biopsy tissue demonstrates at least 5 markers from a panel of 300 individual markers that have a moderate effect size of 1.0 or greater for the difference between the enzalutamide resistant and responding bone metastases
Time Frame: Within 2 weeks of week 12
To compare NaF PET/CT non-responding lesions to known resistance molecular biomarkers obtained from biopsy of non-responding lesions
Within 2 weeks of week 12
Characterizations obtained from NaF PET/CT images from patients who demonstrate a progression free survival of greater than 12 months on enzalutamide treatment.
Time Frame: Within 2 weeks of week 12
To determine NaF PET/CT -derived radiomic profiles that correlate with prolonged benefit (PFS > 12 month) to enzalutamide
Within 2 weeks of week 12
Comparison of the percentage of responding/non-responding lesions on NaF PET/CT to PSA response, RECIST response, time to PSA progressions and radiographic progression free survival
Time Frame: Within 2 weeks of week 12
To correlate global responsiveness on NaF PET/CT (percentage of responding/non-responding lesions, SUVtotal) with clinical outcomes: PSA response, RECIST response, time to PSA progressions, and radiographic PFS
Within 2 weeks of week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Wisconsin, Madison

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Prostate Cancer Foundation

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Glenn Liu, Principal Investigator

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 27, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 30, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 3, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 8, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 3, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 9, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 26, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 24, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • UW15052
  • A534260 (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
  • SMPH\MEDICINE\HEM-ONC (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
  • 2015-1174 (Other Identifier: Institutional Review Board)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings