Prophylactic Racemic Epinephrine in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

March 30, 2016 updated by: Andrew Chung

Prophylactic Racemic Epinephrine for the Prevention of Dysphagia in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Randomized Control Trial

Our double-blinded, randomized control trial will assess the effect of nebulized racemic epinephrine inpatients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures. The investigators have had success in managing post-operative dysphagia in patients undergoing ACDF with the administration of this drug. Half of the participants will review nebulized epinephrine. The other half will receive placebo.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Based on data from the National Inpatient Sample from 2002-2012, patients undergoing elective primary ACDF, diagnosed with dysphagia (4% of total patients), had a two-fold increase in mean length of stay (4.03 compared to 1.56 days; p < 0.001) and a substantial increase in their total hospital charges (p < 0.001) versus those not diagnosed with dysphagia. There are very few level I studies which describe successful management of these complications. Steroids have shown promise, however, there exist concerns for consequent delayed bony fusion. Racemic epinephrine is a mixture of both the R and L isomers of epinephrine which theoretically results in a milder side effect profile and longer shelf-life versus the standard L-epinephrine. Traditionally, racemic epinephrine has been administered in a nebulized form for the treatment of severe asthma, laryngeal edema, and bronchiolitis. The most severe side effects that have been reported include tachyarrhythmias and paradoxical bronchospasms, although these reports are rare and limited mainly to single case reports or case series. It confers its therapeutic effect through Racemic α-adrenergic and β-adrenergic mediated vasoconstriction of mucosal vasculature decreasing edema and in the respiratory tract, inducing bronchodilation. The PI, has been utilizing nebulized racemic epinephrine at standard dosages (1 unit of 0.5 ml of 2.25% racemic epinephrine) for the treatment of severe post-operative dysphagia in patients undergoing ACDF for 20 years. The investigator has achieved marked success with this intervention with no notable associated complications. Despite being successfully utilized in this manner for many years in small pockets of the spine community, the use of prophylactic racemic epinephrine for the management of dysphagia has not been described in the literature. The investigators hope to be able to fill this important knowledge-gap with our study data.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
90

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Chutkan, MD

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85006
        • Banner University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients > 18 years of age
  2. Primary two and three-level ACDF between C3-7
  3. Approved pre-authorization to undergo the procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients < 18 years of age
  2. Patients who are unable to give their own consent
  3. Revision ACDF
  4. Combined anterior-posterior surgeries
  5. Surgeries involving C2-C3 or C7-T1
  6. Surgeries related to trauma, infection, or tumor
  7. Patients with baseline swallowing dysfunction
  8. Patients currently on steroids
  9. Patients with severe cardiac disease
  10. Uncontrolled diabetics as defined by patients with a HbA1C > 8%
  11. Patients with known allergy to epinephrine

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Experimental: Racemic Epinephrine
Over the Counter (OTC) - 0.5 mL Nebulized Racemic Epinephrine
Drug: Racemic Epinephrine
1 inhalation of 0.5 mL of 2.25% Nebulized Racemic Epinephrine every 8 hours for 24 hours after surgery
Other Names:
  • AsthmaNefrin
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo: 0.9% Normal Saline
0.5 mL 0.9% Normal Saline
Drug: Placebo (for racemic epinephrine)
0.5 mL of normal saline will be prepared in an identical amber syringe as the drug intervention (racemic epinephrine)
Other Names:
  • 0.9% normal saline

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Dysphagia Numeric Rating Scale (DNRS)
Time Frame: Post-operative day 1, just prior to hospital discharge (up to 1 week post-operatively), the first post-operative visit (10-14 days post-operatively, up to 30 days from surgery depending on clinical course).
It is a simple questionnaire that is a functional assessment of dysphagia i.e. difficulty swallowing solids, liquids, etc. Additionally, asks a simple "yes" and "no" question for the presence of dysphagia.
Post-operative day 1, just prior to hospital discharge (up to 1 week post-operatively), the first post-operative visit (10-14 days post-operatively, up to 30 days from surgery depending on clinical course).
Change in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) - Odynophagia
Time Frame: Post-operative day 1, just prior to hospital discharge (up to 1 week post-operatively), the first post-operative visit (10-14 days post-operatively, up to 30 days from surgery depending on clinical course).
It is a simple self-reported pain intensity scale from 0-10 with 0 being no pain, and 10 being the worst pain possible as it relates to swallowing.
Post-operative day 1, just prior to hospital discharge (up to 1 week post-operatively), the first post-operative visit (10-14 days post-operatively, up to 30 days from surgery depending on clinical course).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Rate of dysphonia
Time Frame: Post-operative day 1, just prior to hospital discharge (up to 1 week post-operatively), the first post-operative visit (10-14 days post-operatively, up to 30 days from surgery depending on clinical course).
Patients will be asked to answer whether or not they are experiencing dysphonia with a simple "yes" or "no".
Post-operative day 1, just prior to hospital discharge (up to 1 week post-operatively), the first post-operative visit (10-14 days post-operatively, up to 30 days from surgery depending on clinical course).
Airway complication
Time Frame: Up to 1 month post-operatively
Any airway complication related to post-operative swelling that requires intubation will be retrospectively recorded off of hospital records. This will be recorded as the number of patients requiring intubation. This number will be reported in any future presentation of data.
Up to 1 month post-operatively
Length of Stay
Time Frame: Up to 30 days post-operatively.
Length of hospital stay following surgery
Up to 30 days post-operatively.
Hospital Cost
Time Frame: Up to 30 days post-operatively.
Will determine any additional cost of care associated with dysphagia, dysphonia, airway complications. This will include any emergency department visits or hospital re-admissions directly related to these post-operative complications.
Up to 30 days post-operatively.
30-day Hospital re-admission rates
Time Frame: Up to 30 days post-operatively.
any re-admission in the first 30 days following surgery specifically due to dysphagia, dysphonia, or airway complications related to surgery.
Up to 30 days post-operatively.
Number of emergency department visits per patient related to surgical complications of dysphagia or difficulty breathing
Time Frame: 30 days
Number of emergency department visits in the first 30 days following surgery with patient complaint of "difficulty or pain with swallowing" or "difficulty breathing" as direct complications of surgery (i.e. secondary to post-operative swelling, hematoma formation). Patient charts will be retrospectively reviewed 30 days post-operatively.
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Andrew Chung

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
More Foundation
Banner Health

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Norman Chutkan, MD, The CORE Institute, Banner University Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2018

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 7, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 30, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 31, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 31, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 30, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • BannerHealth

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data will be be presented in a research paper format and submitted to a journal following completion of the study.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings