Evaluation of Xiaflex: Trial of Effectivenss iN Dupuytren's (EXTEND)

June 23, 2023 updated by: Achilleas Thoma, McMaster University

A Multi-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing The Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Collagenase Injection (Xiaflex) and Palmar Fasciectomy in the Management of Dupuytren's Disease

This is a prospective, multi-centre, pragmatic randomized controlled trial to compare both the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of collagenase injections (CI) versus limited palmar fasciectomy (LPF) to determine if collagenase is a superior treatment in terms of improved quality of life and reducing recurrence of the disease without serious complications. Since collagenase injections are costly it is also important to know if this novel intervention is cost-effective from the patient, Ministry of Health and societal perspectives.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Limited palmar fasciectomy (LPF) and collagenase injection (CI) are the most common procedures to manage symptoms of Dupuytren's Disease. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to directly compare patient outcomes 12 months following CI and LPF. Twenty-two patients with Dupuytren's Disease were randomized to either LPF or CI. The primary outcome was health state measured by the Michigan Hand Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were health status (The Health Utility Index-3), function (The Unité Rhumatologique des Affections de la Main and The Southampton Dupuytren's Scoring Scheme), and range of motion (ROM) of treated digits. Measurements were collected at baseline and 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-procedure.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
22

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 3Z5
        • Hamilton Health Sciences
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 4A6
        • St. Joseph's Healthcare / McMaster University
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
        • St. Joseph's Hospital
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 4V2
        • St. Joseph's Healthcare
      • Markham, Ontario, Canada, L6B 0T1
        • Markham Stouffville Hospital
      • Newmarket, Ontario, Canada, L3Y 5G8
        • 679 Davis St. Suite 209
      • Oakville, Ontario, Canada, L6J 0B2
        • Halton Healthcare Services
      • Oakville, Ontario, Canada
        • Oakville Trafalgar Hospital
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1Y 4E9
        • The Ottawa Hospital
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M2J 1V1
        • North York General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Canadian Citizen
  2. 18 years of age or older
  3. Dupuytren's contracture of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint or of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint with a fixed flexion contracture of 20º or greater in at least 1 finger (not the thumb)
  4. Demonstrated inability to simultaneously place the affected finger and palm flat on a table
  5. Able to understand and communicate in English

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous treatment of the primary joint within 90 days of study inclusion
  2. Patients undergoing any concomitant procedure on the same hand (e.g. carpal tunnel release, stenosing tenosynovitis release)
  3. Persistent extension deficit from a previous surgery of the same digit
  4. Any chronic muscular or neuromuscular disorder affecting wrist or hand
  5. Patient generally unfit for surgery
  6. Patient with specific treatment preference
  7. Bleeding disorder or recent stroke
  8. Allergy to collagenase
  9. Collagenase treatment or treatment with any investigational drug within 30 days of study inclusion
  10. Use of a tetracycline derivative within 14 days of first dose of study drug (because tetracycline derivatives may inhibit the collagenolytic activity of mammalian collagenase homologs [i.e., matrix metalloproteinases])
  11. Pregnant or breast feeding patients
  12. Patients who do not have insurance coverage for collagenase injections
  13. Patients who are unable to provide informed consent or are unable to complete quality of life questionnaires due to mental capacity or neuro-psychological problems.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: collagenase injection
This procedure will be performed either in a minor procedure room or the hand clinic as per surgeon's routine practice. Collagenase will be administered with or without local anesthesia. As this is a pragmatic study there may be more than one digit injected at a time just as surgery occurs on more than one digit at a time. A recently published study by Gaston et al confirmed that two concurrent injections of collagenase to 2 affected joints in the same hand are generally well tolerated and the frequency of most adverse events (AEs) is similar to those reported in studies that use single sequential injections.
Drug: collagenase injection
injection
Other Names:
  • enzyme, collagenase clostridium histolyticum, xiaflex
Active Comparator: limited palmar fasciectomy
The Dupuytren's cord will be excised under local anesthesia in a minor procedure room setting or main operating room under local or general anesthetic depending on the complexity of the disease and the surgeon's routine. As this is a pragmatic study comparison of collagenase injections (novel intervention) to limited palmar fasciectomy as it is actually presently performed in all settings academic or community (local in minor room or general/local anesthetic in the main operating room) will be examined. Surgery will be performed according to the operating surgeon's preferred technique i.e. zig-zag Brunner incision or straight incision with z-plasty closure of the skin.
Procedure: limited palmar fasciectomy
surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Using the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ)
Time Frame: 1 year
Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ). Converted to a score rated 0-100 (where higher scores represent better function).
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HRQL Measured With the Health Utility Index Mark 3 (HUI3) of Health
Time Frame: 1 year
Health Utility Index Mark 3 (HUI3) of Health. The HUI3 is a generic multi-attribute health-status classification instrument composed of eight attributes or dimensions: vision, hearing, speech, ambulation, dexterity, emotion, cognition, and pain with five or six levels per attribute. Dimensions are combined to produce one health utility score. The HUI3 produces health utilities anchored at 0 (minimum) for equal to being dead and 1 (maximum) for perfect health.
1 year
HRQL Measured With the Unité Rhumatologique Des Affections de la Main (URAM)
Time Frame: 1 year
Unité Rhumatologique des Affections de la Main (URAM). The URAM is a disease-specific HRQL measure developed for Dupuytren's Disease (DD) and is composed of a 9-item patient-reported questionnaire. Each item is scored between 0 and 5 depending on the difficulty in performing that particular function with total scores for DD-associated disability ranging from 0 (best) to 45 (worst). High scores suggest high levels of disability and disturbance. The URAM scale is a 1-domain outcome measure postulated to be related to disability associated with DD.
1 year
HRQL Measured With the Southampton Dupuytren's Scoring Scheme (SDSS)
Time Frame: 1 year
The SDSS is disease-specific scoring system developed for Dupuytren's Disease (DD) with 5 domains, each relevant to DD and scored on a five-point scale (no problem, mild inconvenience, modest inconvenience, definitely troublesome, severe problem). The minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 20 with higher scores suggesting higher levels of disability.
1 year
Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY) Measured With the Health Utility Index Mark 3 (HUI3)
Time Frame: 1 year
QALY was calculated by multiplying the difference between quality of life, as measured by the HUI-3 score before and after the intervention by the remaining years of life of the average patient (i.e., life expectancy - patient's age). Life expectancy was set at 79 years for males, and 84 years for females. Higher QALYs represent improved (better) patient outcomes.
1 year
Recurrence Rates
Time Frame: 1-4 years
Reccurence was measured as whether or not participants received a repeat diagnosis of Dupuytren's disease with loss of finger extension at the site of prior intervention and underwent palmar fasciectomy (following the collagenase injection or as a revision operation) after initial study treatment. The time horizon for recurrence was between 1-4 years post initial study treatment. Outcome was dichotomous (i.e., recurrence; yes or no).
1-4 years
Loss of Extension MCP
Time Frame: 1 year
Passive range of motion degree of extension was measured using a goniometer. Difference in degree, as measured by a goniometer, between the participant's resting maximum extension of the metacarpal-phalangeal joint, relative to a metacarpal-phalangeal joint at full extension (i.e., 0 degrees)
1 year
Loss of Extension PIP
Time Frame: 1 year
Passive range of motion degree of extension was measured using a goniometer. Difference in degree, as measured by a goniometer, between the participant's resting maximum extension of the proximal inter-phalangeal joint, relative to a proximal inter-phalangeal joint at full extension (i.e., 0 degrees)
1 year
Loss of Extension DIP
Time Frame: 1 year
Passive range of motion degree of extension was measured using a goniometer. Difference in degree, as measured by a goniometer, between the participant's resting maximum extension of the distal inter-phalangeal joint, relative to a distal inter-phalangeal joint at full extension (i.e., 0 degrees)
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
McMaster University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
The Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Achilleas Thoma, MD MSc FRCSC, McMaster University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 8, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 17, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 17, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 22, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 29, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 1, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 23, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PSI 2016-03

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings