The Efficacy and Safety Study of Tung's Acupuncture for Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome

September 25, 2019 updated by: Beijing Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine

The Efficacy and Safety Study of Tung's Acupuncture for Improving Ovarian Function of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome: a Randomised Controlled Trial

This study evaluates the efficacy and safety in improving ovarian function of polycystic ovarian syndrome in adults. Half of patients will receive Tung's acupuncture therapy, while the other half will receive Diane-35(CPA/EE) as the control group.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Both Tung's acupuncture therapy and Diane-35(CPA/EE) could improve the symptom of patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome, but until now there is no definite evidence to indicate acupuncture could play the same role in improving ovarian function. So we design this study to observe the change of follicular development, ovary size and sex hormone( testosterone, follitropin, luteinizing hormone) before and after the treatment, and evaluate the efficacy and safty of acupuncture.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100039
        • Beijing Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 41 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Chinese;
  2. 18-45 years old;
  3. to meet the diagnostic criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome;
  4. no need for pregnancy in the next six months;
  5. volunteering to join this research and give informed consent prior to receiving treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. hypertensive patients with blood pressure exceed 160/100 mmHg;
  2. a history of thrombosis,cerebrolvascular diseases, cancer, liver disease or liver dysfuction, hyperlipidemia, mental disorder, and severe infection;
  3. having taken any pharmacological treatments affecting reproductive endocrine system;
  4. having received acupuncture in the previous three months;
  5. smoking more than 15 cigarettes per day;
  6. having pacemakers, metal allergies or severe fear of acupuncture.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Tung's acupuncture
The Tung's acupuncture group received acupuncture treatments twice per week for 12 weeks. The study took Tung's acupoints as main acupuncture points, which were Fuke, Huanchao, Tianhuang, Renhuang, as well as the traditional acupoints Guanyuan (CV4) and Zigong (EX-CA1).
Other: Tung's acupuncture
The study took Tung's acupoints as main acupuncture points, which were Fuke, Huanchao, Tianhuang, Renhuang, as well as the traditional acupoints Guanyuan (CV4) and Zigong (EX-CA1).
Active Comparator: CPA/EE
Cyproterone acetate/ethinylestradiol (CPA/EE) was taken orally one tablet per day from the 8th day of menstrual cycle or any day for patients with amenorrhea. The pills were administered for 21 days consecutively. The patients then stopped taking the pills for seven days and, on the eighth day, continued to take the pills again for three menstrual cycles (28 day cycles).
Drug: Cyproterone acetate/ethinylestradiol (CPA/EE)
Cyproterone acetate/ethinylestradiol (CPA/EE) contains 2mg cyproterone acetate (an anti-androgenic progestin) and 0.035mg ethinylestradiol (CPA/EE). The pills were administered for 21 days consecutively. The patients then stopped taking the pills for seven days and, on the eighth day, continued to take the pills again for three menstrual cycles (28 day cycles).
Other Names:
  • Diane-35

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in LH/FSH Ratio From Baseline to the End of Treatment
Time Frame: baseline and 12 weeks
the change in LH/FSH ratio, values after 12-week treatment minus the values at baseline
baseline and 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in LH/FSH Ratio From Baseline to the 24th Week
Time Frame: baseline to the 24th week
the change in LH/FSH ratio, values at the 24th week minus the values at baseline
baseline to the 24th week
Changes in LH From Baseline to the End of Treatment
Time Frame: baseline and 12 weeks
changes in luteinizing hormone(LH), values after 12-week treatment minus the values at baseline
baseline and 12 weeks
Changes in FSH From Baseline to the End of Treatment
Time Frame: baseline and 12 weeks
changes in follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), values after 12-week treatment minus the values at baseline
baseline and 12 weeks
Changes in Body Mass Index (BMI) From Baseline to the End of Treatment
Time Frame: baseline and 12 weeks
the changes in BMI, values after 12-week treatment minus the values at baseline
baseline and 12 weeks
Changes in Total Testosterone (TT) From Baseline to the End of Treatment
Time Frame: baseline and 12 weeks
changes in total testosterone (TT) , values after 12-week treatment minus the values at baseline
baseline and 12 weeks
Changes in Ovarian Volume From Baseline to the End of Treatment
Time Frame: baseline and 12 weeks
changes in ovarian volume, values after 12-week treatment minus the values at baseline
baseline and 12 weeks
Changes in Polycystic Ovary Number From Baseline to the End of Treatment
Time Frame: baseline and 12 weeks
the changes in polycystic ovary number, values after 12-week treatment minus the values at baseline
baseline and 12 weeks
Changes in the Number of Bleeding Events From Baseline to the End of Treatment
Time Frame: baseline and 12 weeks
Changes in the number of bleeding events, values after 12-week treatment minus the values at baseline
baseline and 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Beijing Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Zhishun Liu, Doctor, Guang'anmen Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 29, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 31, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 6, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 8, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 25, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • JJ2015-42

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

to share data by publishing paper

IPD Sharing Time Frame

after the paper published around the year of 2020

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

researchers who are interested in this area

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings