A Study of L-DOPA for Depression and Slowing in Older Adults

May 15, 2023 updated by: Bret Rutherford, New York State Psychiatric Institute
Individuals with Late Life Depression (LLD) often have cognitive problems, particularly problems with memory, attention, and problem solving, all of which contribute to antidepressant non-response. Our group and others have shown that decreased thinking speed is the central cause of functional problems in patients with LLD. Similarly, decreased walking speed is associated with depression and carries additional risk for falls, hospitalization, and death. Available evidence suggests that declining functionality in the brain's dopamine system contributes to age-related cognitive and motor slowing. The central hypothesis of this R61/R33 Phased Innovation Award is that by enhancing dopamine functioning in the brain and improving cognitive and motor slowing, administration of carbidopa/levodopa (L-DOPA) will improve depressive symptoms in older adults.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study will elucidate the neurobiology of slowing and LLD, identify a novel therapeutic target for depression, and contribute to the development of personalized treatment regimens for LLD. The multimodal neuroimaging methods detailed in this application will provide information about the neurobiology of aging-associated slowing and LLD at molecular, structural, and functional levels of analysis. These data will fill a crucial gap in our knowledge regarding what are the physiologic and functional consequences of dopamine depletion occurring across the lifespan in individuals without PD. Results from this project also will allow us to evaluate a novel therapeutic approach to LLD, which could have large public health ramifications given the prevalence, frequent treatment resistance, and chronicity characteristic of LLD. Even apart from patients with LLD, cognitive and motor slowing exact a large public health burden in terms of impaired functioning and increased morbidity and mortality, and this burden will only grow as the population ages. It is critical to develop treatments capable of altering the negative health trajectories associated with slowing in order to help older adults maintain independent functioning and live longer with an increased quality of life. Finally, while PET and MRI may prove critical to understand the neurobiology of slowing and LLD, their invasiveness and expense limit their roles in informing treatment decisions in clinical practice settings. For this reason the investigators are also assessing the influence of genetic moderators such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and catechol-O-methyl-transferase (COMT) genotype on baseline dopamine functioning and response to L-DOPA. This may facilitate the identification of both high-risk individuals and those most likely to benefit from treatment interventions.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
47

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • New York State Psychiatric Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >59 years
  • DSM 5 non-psychotic Major Depressive Disorder, Dysthymia, or Depression Not Otherwise Specified
  • Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) Rating Scale > 9
  • Decreased processing speed (defined as 0.5 SD below age-adjusted norms on the Digit Symbol Test) and decreased gait speed (defined as average walking speed over 15' course < 1 m/s)
  • Willing and capable of providing informed consent and complying with study procedures
  • Prefer not to be treated with a standard treatment for MDD, Dysthymia, or Depression NOS (e.g., antidepressant medication or psychotherapy)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of substance abuse or dependence (excluding Tobacco Use Disorder) within the past 12 months
  • History of or current psychosis, psychotic disorder, mania, or bipolar disorder
  • Diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's Disease, Vascular Dementia, or PD
  • Mini Mental Status Exam (MMSE) < 25
  • HRSD ≥ 25 or the presence of significant suicide risk
  • Current or recent (within the past 4 weeks) treatment with antidepressants, antipsychotics, dopaminergic agents, or mood stabilizers
  • History of allergy, hypersensitivity reaction, or severe intolerance to LDOPA
  • Acute, severe, or unstable medical or neurological illness
  • Mobility limiting osteoarthritis of any lower extremity joints, symptomatic lumbar spine disease, history of joint replacement surgery, or history of spine surgery
  • Hypotension (SBP<90), hypertension (SBP >150 or DBP > 90), past stroke causing sensory or movement deficits, cardiac arrhythmias, or any other severe or uncontrolled cardiovascular disease
  • Having contraindication to MRI scanning (such as metal in body) or unable to tolerate the scanning procedures
  • History of significant radioactivity exposure (nuclear medicine studies or occupational exposure)
  • Presence of a clinically significant brain abnormality, significant anemia, insulin dependent diabetes, a history of cardiovascular disease, or uncontrolled/untreated risk factors for coronary artery disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: L-DOPA
Patients will receive titration of L-DOPA from 150 mg to 450 mg.
Drug: Levodopa
Other Names:
  • L-Dopa

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (24 Item)
Time Frame: Week 3
Our target is depressive symptomatology as measured by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD). The HRSD is a 24-item questionnaire used as an indication of depression and a guide to evaluate recovery. Total scores range from 0-74, not including atypical symptoms sub-scale. A score of 16 or above is typically considered to indicate the presence of depressive symptoms. Higher scores indicate greater severity.
Week 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Digit Symbol Substitution Test
Time Frame: Screening
Digit symbol substitution test (DSST) is a neuropsychological test sensitive to brain damage, dementia, age and depression. The test is not sensitive to the location of brain-damage (except for damage comprising part of the visual field). It consists of (e.g. nine) digit-symbol pairs (e.g. 1/-,2/┴ ... 7/Λ,8/X,9/=) followed by a list of digits. Under each digit the subject should write down the corresponding symbol as fast as possible. The number of correct symbols within the allowed time (e.g. 90 or 120 sec) is measured. The higher the number, the better the score.
Screening
Digit Symbol Substitution Test
Time Frame: Week 3
Digit symbol substitution test (DSST) is a neuropsychological test sensitive to brain damage, dementia, age and depression. The test is not sensitive to the location of brain-damage (except for damage comprising part of the visual field). It consists of (e.g. nine) digit-symbol pairs (e.g. 1/-,2/┴ ... 7/Λ,8/X,9/=) followed by a list of digits. Under each digit the subject should write down the corresponding symbol as fast as possible. The number of correct symbols within the allowed time (e.g. 90 or 120 sec) is measured. The higher the number, the better the score.
Week 3
Pattern Comparison
Time Frame: Screening
This test required participants to identify whether two visual patterns are the "same" or "not the same" (responses were made by pressing a "yes" or "no" button). Patterns were either identical or varied on one of three dimensions: color (all ages), adding/taking something away (all ages), or one versus many. Scores reflected the number of correct items (of a possible 130) completed in 90 s; items were designed to minimize the number of errors that were made.
Screening
Pattern Comparison
Time Frame: Week 3
This test required participants to identify whether two visual patterns are the "same" or "not the same" (responses were made by pressing a "yes" or "no" button). Patterns were either identical or varied on one of three dimensions: color (all ages), adding/taking something away (all ages), or one versus many. Scores reflected the number of correct items (of a possible 130) completed in 90 s; items were designed to minimize the number of errors that were made.
Week 3
Letter Comparison
Time Frame: Screening
Subjects will be asked to determine whether two strings of letters are the same or different. There are 3 pages and the subject is given 30 seconds per page. Scoring is based on the number answered correctly. The higher the number, the better the score.
Screening
Letter Comparison
Time Frame: Week 3
Subjects will be asked to determine whether two strings of letters are the same or different. There are 3 pages and the subject is given 30 seconds per page. Scoring is based on the number answered correctly. The higher the number, the better the score.
Week 3
Single Task Gait Speed
Time Frame: Screening
Patients' gait will be assessed as walking speed in m/s on a 15' walking course. Patients are instructed to walk at their usual or normal speed for a total of 27' (starting and ending at a point 6 feet prior to and after the 15' course to eliminate acceleration and deceleration effects). Two trials will be completed, and gait speed will be based on the average of 2 trials.
Screening
Single Task Gait Speed
Time Frame: Week 3
Patients' gait will be assessed as walking speed in m/s on a 15' walking course. Patients are instructed to walk at their usual or normal speed for a total of 27' (starting and ending at a point 6 feet prior to and after the 15' course to eliminate acceleration and deceleration effects). Two trials will be completed, and gait speed will be based on the average of 2 trials.
Week 3
Dual Task Gait Speed
Time Frame: Screening
For the Dual Task, patients are instructed to walk at their usual pace while simultaneously verbally listing as many animals as possible. In addition, a counting Dual Task will be used in which patients are instructed to walk at their usual pace while simultaneously performing serial subtractions by three starting at 100. Patients will start and end at a point 2 meters from the Gaitrite mat to eliminate acceleration and deceleration effects. Dual Task will be assessed two times with the average used in the analyses
Screening
Dual Task Gait Speed
Time Frame: Week 3
For the Dual Task, patients are instructed to walk at their usual pace while simultaneously verbally listing as many animals as possible. In addition, a counting Dual Task will be used in which patients are instructed to walk at their usual pace while simultaneously performing serial subtractions by three starting at 100. Patients will start and end at a point 2 meters from the Gaitrite mat to eliminate acceleration and deceleration effects. Dual Task will be assessed two times with the average used in the analyse.
Week 3
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report
Time Frame: Screening
Rating scale for depressive symptoms based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) criteria that has been increasingly used in antidepressant studies due to its equivalent weightings for each item, understandable anchor points, and inclusion of all Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders criteria. Patients will be asked to circle the one response to each item that best describes them for the past seven days. The answers range 0-84. The higher the score the greater the depressive symptoms.
Screening
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report
Time Frame: Week 3
Rating scale for depressive symptoms based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) criteria that has been increasingly used in antidepressant studies due to its equivalent weightings for each item, understandable anchor points, and inclusion of all Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders criteria. Patients will be asked to circle the one response to each item that best describes them for the past seven days. The answers range 0-84. The higher the score the greater the depressive symptoms.
Week 3
Pre-Treatment [11C]-Raclopride Binding Potential: Sensorimotor Striatum
Time Frame: Baseline
Subjects received 2 [11C]-raclopride positron emission tomography (PET) scans: baseline and post-L-DOPA treatment. High resolution anatomical T1-weighted MRI scans were acquired for each subject and PET data were co-registered to the MRIs using maximization of mutual information (SPM12, Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging). Regions of interest (ROIs) were applied to the MRIs and transferred to the PET data and included the sensorimotor striatum (post-commissural putamen, SMST), associative striatum (whole caudate and pre-commissural putamen, AST) and the limbic striatum (nucleus accumbens and the most ventral aspects of the pre-commissural caudate and putamen, LST). Additionally, an ROI was drawn on cerebellum as a reference tissue. ROI time activity curves were derived as the average activity in each ROI in each frame. The primary outcome measure was BPND, the binding potential with respect to the non-displaceable compartment, derived by the simplified reference tissue model.
Baseline
Post-Treatment [11C]-Raclopride Binding Potential: Sensorimotor Striatum
Time Frame: Week 3
Subjects received 2 [11C]-raclopride positron emission tomography (PET) scans: baseline and post-L-DOPA treatment. High resolution anatomical T1-weighted MRI scans were acquired for each subject and PET data were co-registered to the MRIs using maximization of mutual information (SPM12, Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging). Regions of interest (ROIs) were applied to the MRIs and transferred to the PET data and included the sensorimotor striatum (post-commissural putamen, SMST), associative striatum (whole caudate and pre-commissural putamen, AST) and the limbic striatum (nucleus accumbens and the most ventral aspects of the pre-commissural caudate and putamen, LST). Additionally, an ROI was drawn on cerebellum as a reference tissue. ROI time activity curves were derived as the average activity in each ROI in each frame. The primary outcome measure was BPND, the binding potential with respect to the non-displaceable compartment, derived by the simplified reference tissue model.
Week 3
Pre-Treatment [11C]-Raclopride Binding Potential: Limbic Striatum
Time Frame: Baseline
Subjects received 2 [11C]-raclopride positron emission tomography (PET) scans: baseline and post-L-DOPA treatment. High resolution anatomical T1-weighted MRI scans were acquired for each subject and PET data were co-registered to the MRIs using maximization of mutual information (SPM12, Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging). Regions of interest (ROIs) were applied to the MRIs and transferred to the PET data and included the sensorimotor striatum (post-commissural putamen, SMST), associative striatum (whole caudate and pre-commissural putamen, AST) and the limbic striatum (nucleus accumbens and the most ventral aspects of the pre-commissural caudate and putamen, LST). Additionally, an ROI was drawn on cerebellum as a reference tissue. ROI time activity curves were derived as the average activity in each ROI in each frame. The primary outcome measure was BPND, the binding potential with respect to the non-displaceable compartment, derived by the simplified reference tissue model.
Baseline
Post-Treatment [11C]-Raclopride Binding Potential: Limbic Striatum
Time Frame: Week 3
Subjects received 2 [11C]-raclopride positron emission tomography (PET) scans: baseline and post-L-DOPA treatment. High resolution anatomical T1-weighted MRI scans were acquired for each subject and PET data were co-registered to the MRIs using maximization of mutual information (SPM12, Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging). Regions of interest (ROIs) were applied to the MRIs and transferred to the PET data and included the sensorimotor striatum (post-commissural putamen, SMST), associative striatum (whole caudate and pre-commissural putamen, AST) and the limbic striatum (nucleus accumbens and the most ventral aspects of the pre-commissural caudate and putamen, LST). Additionally, an ROI was drawn on cerebellum as a reference tissue. ROI time activity curves were derived as the average activity in each ROI in each frame. The primary outcome measure was BPND, the binding potential with respect to the non-displaceable compartment, derived by the simplified reference tissue model.
Week 3
Pre-Treatment [11C]-Raclopride Binding Potential: Associative Striatum
Time Frame: Baseline
Subjects received 2 [11C]-raclopride positron emission tomography (PET) scans: baseline and post-L-DOPA treatment. High resolution anatomical T1-weighted MRI scans were acquired for each subject and PET data were co-registered to the MRIs using maximization of mutual information (SPM12, Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging). Regions of interest (ROIs) were applied to the MRIs and transferred to the PET data and included the sensorimotor striatum (post-commissural putamen, SMST), associative striatum (whole caudate and pre-commissural putamen, AST) and the limbic striatum (nucleus accumbens and the most ventral aspects of the pre-commissural caudate and putamen, LST). Additionally, an ROI was drawn on cerebellum as a reference tissue. ROI time activity curves were derived as the average activity in each ROI in each frame. The primary outcome measure was BPND, the binding potential with respect to the non-displaceable compartment, derived by the simplified reference tissue model.
Baseline
Post-Treatment [11C]-Raclopride Binding Potential: Associative Striatum
Time Frame: Week 3
Subjects received 2 [11C]-raclopride positron emission tomography (PET) scans: baseline and post-L-DOPA treatment. High resolution anatomical T1-weighted MRI scans were acquired for each subject and PET data were co-registered to the MRIs using maximization of mutual information (SPM12, Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging). Regions of interest (ROIs) were applied to the MRIs and transferred to the PET data and included the sensorimotor striatum (post-commissural putamen, SMST), associative striatum (whole caudate and pre-commissural putamen, AST) and the limbic striatum (nucleus accumbens and the most ventral aspects of the pre-commissural caudate and putamen, LST). Additionally, an ROI was drawn on cerebellum as a reference tissue. ROI time activity curves were derived as the average activity in each ROI in each frame. The primary outcome measure was BPND, the binding potential with respect to the non-displaceable compartment, derived by the simplified reference tissue model.
Week 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
New York State Psychiatric Institute

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Bret Rutherford, MD, New York State Psychiatric Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 24, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 14, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 13, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 15, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 20, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 15, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 7270

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data obtained from this study will be shared with the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Data Archive (NDA) and will maintain patient confidentiality by ensuring exclusion of all 18 identifiers (outlined by HIPAA) prior to data sharing. All assessment outcomes will be shared twice a year as per NIMH Data Archive (NDA) guidelines.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available for as long as NIMH deems necessary.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Information can be accessed by going to the NUMH Data Archive website and searching the protocol. One must request access to detailed human subjects data. To do this you must be sponsored by an NIH recognized institution with a Federal wide Assurance and have a research related need to access NIMH Data Archive (NDA) data.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings