Vitamin E-Diffused Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Liner

June 9, 2016 updated by: Bita Shareghi, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden

Wear and Creep of Vitamin E-Diffused Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Liners Randomized Radiostereometric Study of 70 Hips Followed for 2 Years

Vitamin E incorporated highly cross linked polyethylene (E-XLPE) was developed to increase oxidative resistance of highly cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) without affecting mechanical properties. The investigators evaluated this type of polyethylene in a randomized clinical study, using Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA). The objective of this study was to compare the early-term wear of E-XLPE to a compression annealed polyethylene liner (C-XLPE, ArComXL®). The clinical outcome at two years was not expected to be affected by the choice of polyethylene.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

First generation of modern highly cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) was clinically introduced in 1998 and has in most countries become standard as bearing surface in total hip arthroplasty. Studies of these materials have shown significantly reduced femoral head penetration when compared to gamma sterilized conventional polyethylene.

Thermaly treating (melting or annealing) is often a part of the manufacturing process of highly cross-linked polyethylenes. The polyethylene is exposed to irradiation to achieve cross-linking and improve wear resistance. Cross-linking by irradiation increases the amount of free radicals in the material.These radicals must be eliminated or stabilized to avoid oxidative degradation over time.Thermal treatment improves oxidation resistance but potentially changes the mechanical properties of the polyethylene.

By annealing i.e. heat treatment under the melt temperature the material maintains better mechanical properties, but elimination of free radicals is suboptimal, which can lead to oxidation in vivo.Heat treatment of the polyethylene above the melt temperature will more effectively reduce or eliminate the amount of residual free radicals. This will increase oxidation resistance, but will negatively influence the mechanical properties of the material.

Due to these limitations new generations of cross-linked polyethylene materials have been developed. Introducing Vitamin E (α-tocopherol), a natural antioxidant into the material prevents oxidative degradation and stabilizes the free radicals found in irradiated polyethylene plastic. In laboratory tests, polyethylene liners with incorporated vitamin-E have demonstrated similar wear, greater strength and better resistance to oxidation compared with the first generation cross-linked polyethylene. Currently, there are only laboratory studies on vitamin E diffused polyethylene available.

The hypothesis in this study is that the early-term E-XLPE wear is low and comparable to a heat-treated XLPE. The investigators also hypothesize that implant fixation and clinical outcome at two years will be unaffected by the choice of polyethylene.

The investigators therefore evaluated the early bedding in and wear in an uncemented arthroplasty supplied with liners made of vitamin E diffusion doped XLPE (E1®, Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA). In the control group the investigators used the same uncemented hip prosthesis with polyethylene liners manufactured to achieve high levels of crosslinking without sacrificing the mechanical strength and extinguish residual free radicals (ArComXL® , Biomet, Warzaw, IN, USA).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
70

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 71 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • primary and certain subgroups of secondary osteoarthritis
  • Patients aged 20-75 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • inflammatory arthritis
  • cortisone or chemotherapy treatment
  • known osteoporosis or osteomalacia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: E-XLPE
E-poly
Other: E-poly
comparison of two different polyethylene plastic 0,04 mm at 3 months 0,06 at 2 years
Other: ArComXL
comparison of two different polyethylene plastic 0,03 mm at 3 months 0,10 mm at 2 years
Active Comparator: C-XLPE
ArComXL
Other: E-poly
comparison of two different polyethylene plastic 0,04 mm at 3 months 0,06 at 2 years
Other: ArComXL
comparison of two different polyethylene plastic 0,03 mm at 3 months 0,10 mm at 2 years

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wear of vitamin E incorporated highly cross linked polyethylene
Time Frame: up to 2 years
Evaluation of the early bedding in and wear in an uncemented arthroplasty supplied with liners made of vitamin E diffusion doped XLPE in comparsion to annealed polyethylene liner, ArComXL.
up to 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cup and stem translations
Time Frame: up to 2 years
Evaluation of cup and stem translations of vitamin E incorporated highly cross linked polyethylene compared to annealed polyethylene liner ArComXL liner.
up to 2 years

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Precision of the Radiostereometric analysis method
Time Frame: Postoperatively, whitin 3 to 5 days after surgery
The differences between the postoperative double-examinations was used to compute the precision for the method.
Postoperatively, whitin 3 to 5 days after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Johan Kärrholm, Professor, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 30, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 9, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 15, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 15, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 9, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Dnr 279-08

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on E-poly

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings