A Trial on SBRT Versus MWA for Inoperable Colorectal Liver Metastases (CLM)

September 14, 2022 updated by: Michele Tedeschi, Istituto Clinico Humanitas

A Randomized Phase III Trial on Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) Versus Microwave Ablation (MWA) for Inoperable Colorectal Liver Metastases (CLM)

The trial is designed to perform a rigorous evaluation of efficacy and tolerability of SBRT by means of a randomised, controlled trial in patients affected by inoperable colorectal liver metastases. The chosen comparator is MWA.

The two modality treatments (SBRT versus MWA) will be evaluated for short- and longer-term outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The trial is a monocentric prospective, randomised controlled, unblinded, parallel-group superiority trial of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) versus Microwave Ablation (MWA) for the curative treatment of inoperable colorectal liver metastases. Patients will be randomised on an equal basis to either SBRT or MWA. The two modality treatments (SBRT versus MWA) will be evaluated for short- and longer-term outcomes. The key short-term outcomes will include assessment of local response rate and acute toxicity. Longer-term outcomes will concentrate on oncological aspects of the disease with analysis of disease-free and overall survival and local recurrence rates at 3-year follow-up.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
26

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Italy
    • Milan
      • Rozzano, Milan, Italy, 20089
        • HUMANITAS Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >18 years
  • Karnofsky index >70%
  • Histological proven adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum with radiological (by CT- or MRI) or histological-/cytological verified liver metastases.
  • Metastases must be visible on diagnostic- and dose planning CT scans and on ultrasonography.
  • The patient should not be suitable for surgical resection due to technical or patient-related conditions. Resectability must be judged by a trained hepatobiliary surgeon and discussed in a multidisciplinary team meeting.
  • Presence of 1-3 lesions .
  • Diameter ≤ 40 mm.
  • All tumors should be feasible for treatment with each of the two modalities, SBRT and MWA
  • Adequate liver function: bilirubin <1.5 mg/dl, alb> 3.5g/dl, normal PT/PTT except if the patient uses anticoagulants, liver enzymes<3 times upper limit of normal. No ascites.
  • Renal function must be adequate for infusion of iv. contrast for CT-scan.
  • Adequate bone marrow function: Hbg³8 g/dl, platelets³100.000 and leucocytes ³2.000/ml.
  • Informed consent.
  • Extrahepatic disease stable or in response after CT
  • No previous abdominal radiation therapy (RT)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncontrolled primary tumor or extrahepatic disease
  • Previous abdominal radiation therapy (RT) or other local conservative treatment on lesion target.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patients.
  • Prior malignancy within the last five years (except adequately treated basal cell carcinoma of the skin or in situ carcinoma of the skin or in situ carcinoma of the cervix, surgically cured, or localized prostate cancer without evidence of biochemical progression).
  • Previous inclusion in this study.
  • Underlying liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh grade B or C).
  • Ascites and/or relevant intra-hepatic biliary tract dilatation.
  • Mental conditions rendering the patient incapable to understand the nature, scope, and consequences of the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Stereotactic body radiation therapy
Patients are treated with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy, a methodology for delivering a conformal high dose of radiation to the tumor and a minimal dose to surrounding critical tissues, with a hypofractionation schedule.
Radiation: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
Stereotactic body radiation is a therapy for delivering a conformal high dose of radiation to the tumor and a minimal dose to surrounding critical tissues, with a hypofractionation schedule
Active Comparator: Microwave Ablation
Patients are treated with Microwave Ablation,a newer technology that utilizes high-frequency electromagnetic radiation to create thermal damage and coagulation necrosis.
Procedure: Microwave Ablation
Microwave ablation (MWA) is a newer technology that utilizes high-frequency electromagnetic radiation to create thermal damage and coagulation necrosis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Control of local disease
Time Frame: 18 months
Evaluation of proportion of patients free from progression from starting radiotherapy
18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression free-survival of treated patients
Time Frame: 18 months
Evaluation of proportion of patients alive and free from progression
18 months
Overall survival of treated patients
Time Frame: 18 months
Evaluation of proportion of patients alive
18 months
Incidence of acute and late complications
Time Frame: 18 months
Evaluation of early and late post treatment complications
18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Istituto Clinico Humanitas

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Marta Scorsetti, MD, Humanitas Cancer Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 24, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 28, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 30, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 16, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 14, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1559

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings