Cancer Patients' Performance Status Assessed Using Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing and Wearable Data Generation

February 21, 2019 updated by: UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Assessing Performance Status in Cancer Patients Using Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing and Wearable Data Generation: A Prospective Observational Study

The primary objective of this study is to establish the feasibility and value of physical fitness assessment within patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy. If successful, this project will establish the groundwork for physical function assessment in larger cancer clinical trials to assist patient selection and evaluation of toxicity and/or response among trial participants.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Physical fitness, whether measured by performance capacity or daily activity, can predict risk of toxicity while helping to evaluate toxicity itself in the course of cancer chemotherapy. Cytotoxic chemotherapy causes premature aging and frailty in many cancer patients, so measuring and improving physical function may also limit late morbidity and mortality. Clinician-rated performance status (cPS; e.g., ECOG or Karnofsky PS) with or without concomitant organ function testing is the usual gold standard for risk prognostication and patient selection in most cancer settings, but cPS is subjective, unreliable, and relatively sensitive only for patients with significant functional compromise. Objective evaluations of physical function have the potential to augment or even replace cPS in the cancer treatment setting.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
67

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27514
        • Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

60 patients with cancer undergoing a cycle of cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy with at least a 3 week cycle (either adjuvant/curative or palliative)
  • Age ≥ 18, prioritizing patients ≥ 60 years
  • At least 6 weeks out from surgical resection
  • Presence of working email address
  • Access to internet at home and either access to wireless internet or cellular data reception
  • Ability to read and understand English
  • Ability to understand and comply with study procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dementia, altered mental status, or psychiatric condition that would prohibit the understanding or rendering of informed consent
  • Contraindication to CPET per standard American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Adjuvant and Curative Chemotherapy
30 participants. Primarily older (60+ years in age) cancer patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy with adjuvant or curative intent. Will undergo both the Physical Performance Testing and Biometric Devices interventions.
Device: Biometric Devices
Patients will wear two devices: HealthPatch Sensor and Phillips Actiwatch. Health data (e.g. average steps per day, resting heart rate) will be collected and monitored over the course of a cycle of cytotoxic chemotherapy.
Other: Physical Performance Testing
Patients will complete a CPET and 6 minute walk test within one week of starting an upcoming chemotherapy cycle and they will undergo a second CPET upon completion of said chemotherapy cycle.
Palliative Chemoteraphy
30 participants. Primarily older (60+ years in age) cancer patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy with palliative intent. Will undergo both the Physical Performance Testing and Biometric Devices interventions.
Device: Biometric Devices
Patients will wear two devices: HealthPatch Sensor and Phillips Actiwatch. Health data (e.g. average steps per day, resting heart rate) will be collected and monitored over the course of a cycle of cytotoxic chemotherapy.
Other: Physical Performance Testing
Patients will complete a CPET and 6 minute walk test within one week of starting an upcoming chemotherapy cycle and they will undergo a second CPET upon completion of said chemotherapy cycle.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients being approached that agree to participate in the study
Time Frame: 12 months
Measure 1 for study feasibility
12 months
Proportion of patients who complete both baseline and follow up CPET tests without significant testing-related adverse events
Time Frame: 12 months
Measure 2 for study feasibility
12 months
Proportion of patients who wear HealthPatch and have data captured successfully for at least 75% of the time
Time Frame: 12 months
Measure 3 for study feasibility
12 months
Patients who wear Philips Actiwatch and have data captured successfully for at least 75% of the time
Time Frame: 12 months
Measure 4 for study feasibility
12 months
Proportion of patients for whom all data is successfully recorded within the database
Time Frame: 12 months
Measure 5 for study feasibility
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VO2max measured both pre- and post-chemotherapy
Time Frame: 12 months
Measured via cycle egometry
12 months
6 Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Patient-reported sympotomatic toxicity and quality of life
Time Frame: 12 months
Measured using PROMIS, PRO-CTCAE, Godin Leisure Time Exercise questionnaires and Geriatric Assessment
12 months
Patient activity/steps per day
Time Frame: 12 months
Measured using Philips Actiwatch
12 months
Heart rate
Time Frame: 12 months
Continuous heart rate data, resting heart rate, and heart rate variability will be measured using HealthPatch
12 months
Clinician-rated performance status
Time Frame: 12 months
Clinician-rated ECOG and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS)
12 months
Incidence and number of falls
Time Frame: 12 months
Measured by HealthPatch
12 months
Sleep duration
Time Frame: 12 months
Measured by Philips Actiwatch
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Genentech, Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Natalie Grover, MD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
  • Principal Investigator: William A Wood, MD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 21, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 21, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 26, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 22, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 21, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • LCCC 1605

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings