Neoadjuvant Chemo-endocrine Therapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone in ER-positive, HER2-negative Breast Cancer

November 8, 2017 updated by: Zhimin Shao, Fudan University

A Randomized Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Endocrine Therapy Plus Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone as the Neoadjuvant Therapy in the Treatment of ER-positive, HER2-negative Breast Cancer (IIa-IIIc)

This was an open-label, randomized controlled trial that aims to compare the efficacy and safety of the concurrent neoadjuvant chemotherapy with endocrine therapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Data showed that concurrent neoadjuvant chemotherapy with endocrine therapy was a effective option for ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer patients. However this is still a controversial issue. The present study is an open-label randomized controlled clinical trial that aims to investigate the efficacy of concurrent NCT with endocrine therapy (AI with or without GnRH-a) in patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative breast carcinoma.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
249

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200032
        • Cancer Hospital/ Institute, Fudan University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer patients, with histological stage of IIa-IIIc.
  2. Without previous chemotherapy or endocrine therapy.
  3. ECOG scores of 0-2 points
  4. With measurable and evaluable breast tumor pathologically confirmed as invasive ductal carcinoma
  5. Age: 18-70 years
  6. Lateral breast cancer
  7. Normal or acceptable kidney, liver, cardiovascular, and bone marrow functions

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant women or nursing mothers
  2. With distant metastasis
  3. With a history of malignant tumor or complicated with other malignant tumors in addition to breast cancer, except for non-melanoma skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer or other cured malignant tumor without the basis of recurrence for at least five years
  4. With mental illness or other conditions affecting the patient compliance

  5. With other serious diseases or medical conditions:

    1. Congestive heart failure or unstable angina pectoris, myocardial infarction within 6 months before the enrollment, uncontrolled hypertension and uncontrolled high-risk arrhythmia considered by the investigator
    2. Obvious neurological or psychiatric disorders, including psychosis, epileptic dementia and other diseases may affect the understanding and sign of the informed consent for
    3. Uncontrolled acute infection
  6. Concurrent use of other investigational drugs; or participating in other clinical trials involving investigational drugs within 30 days before this study
  7. With allergic constitution and any known or suspected drug allergy
  8. Not suitable for the trial considered by the investigator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: neoadjuvant chemo-endocrine therapy
In the experimental arm, patients received concurrent chemotherapy (fluorouracil 500mg/m2 IV, epirubicin 90mg/m2 IV and cyclophosphamide 500mg/m2 IV on day 1 at 3-weekly intervals for 3 cycles followed by docetaxel 100mg/m2 IV on day 1 at 3-weekly intervals for 3 cycles; or epirubicin 90mg/m2 IV and cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2 IV on day 1 at 2-weekly intervals for 4 cycles, followed by docetaxel 100mg/m2 IV on day 1 at 2-weekly intervals for 4 cycles) with endocrine therapy (letrozole with or without leuprorelin) as a neoadjuvant treatment
Drug: letrozole, leuprorelin, fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, docetaxel
Postmenopausal patients were treated with letrozole 2.5mg/day p.o until complement of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery, while premenopausal ones received letrozole 2.5mg/day p.o and a subcutaneous injection of the GnRH-a, leuprorelin, as concomitant treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (fluorouracil 600mg/m2 IV, epirubicin 90mg/m2 IV and cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2 IV on day 1 at 3-weekly intervals for 3 cycles followed by docetaxel 100mg/m2 IV on day 1 at 3-weekly intervals for 3 cycles; or epirubicin 90mg/m2 IV and cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2 IV on day 1 at 2-weekly intervals for 4 cycles, followed by docetaxel 80mg/m2 IV on day 1 at 2-weekly intervals for 4 cycles), letrozole was delivered after 1 week of first dose of leuprorelin injection.
Other Names:
  • GnRH-a, ENANTONE
Active Comparator: neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone
In the control group, patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (fluorouracil 500mg/m2 IV, epirubicin 90mg/m2 IV and cyclophosphamide 500mg/m2 IV on day 1 at 3-weekly intervals for 3 cycles followed by docetaxel 100mg/m2 IV on day 1 at 3-weekly intervals for 3 cycles; or epirubicin 90mg/m2 IV and cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2 IV on day 1 at 2-weekly intervals for 4 cycles, followed by docetaxel 100mg/m2 IV on day 1 at 2-weekly intervals for 4 cycles)
Drug: fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, docetaxel
Patients received fluorouracil 500mg/m2 IV, epirubicin 90mg/m2 IV and cyclophosphamide 500mg/m2 IV on day 1 at 3-weekly intervals for 3 cycles followed by docetaxel 100mg/m2 IV on day 1 at 3-weekly intervals for 3 cycles; or epirubicin 90mg/m2 IV and cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2 IV on day 1 at 2-weekly intervals for 4 cycles, followed by docetaxel 100mg/m2 IV on day 1 at 2-weekly intervals for 4 cycles.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
objective response rate (ORR)
Time Frame: 4 years
the proportion of patients achieving clinical complete response and partial response in the breast based on magnetic resonance imaging
4 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ki67 proliferation marker changes
Time Frame: 4 years
Absolute Ki67 change as well as geometric mean percentage change in Ki67 positivity
4 years
pathologic complete response (pCR)
Time Frame: 4 years
Disappearance of residual invasive disease (residual ductal carcinoma in situ allowed) in breast and the absence of positive lymph nodes
4 years
pathological response rate
Time Frame: 4 years
The proportion of patients achieving pathological response based on Miller-Payne grading system
4 years
Progression-free survival (DFS)
Time Frame: 6 years
The interval between the date of randomization to disease progression during treatment, any recurrence, contralateral breast cancer, the appearance of a second primary cancer, or death not due to cancer, whichever occurred first.
6 years
Incidence of Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events(grade 3 or 4)
Time Frame: 4 years
Assessed according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0.
4 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Fudan University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Zhi-Min Shao, MD, Cancer Hospital/ Institute, Fudan University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 26, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 30, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 2, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 13, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 8, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NCET-trial

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings