Efficacy of Three Experimental Toothpastes to Remove Plaque

May 15, 2019 updated by: GlaxoSmithKline

Dose Response of Three Experimental Dentifrices in Plaque Removal in a Single Brushing Model

The Dose response of three experimental toothpastes (test product 1, test product 2 and test product 3) to remove plaque after a single brushing, compared to a positive control and negative control dentifrice will be evaluated.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This will be a single centre, controlled, examiner blind, five treatment, five period, crossover design study in healthy participants. This study will evaluate the dose response of three experimental toothpastes (test product 1, test product 2 and test product 3) to remove plaque after a single brushing, compared to a positive control and negative control dentifrice. Plaque removal efficacy will be measured by Turesky modification of Quigley Hein Plaque Index (TPI).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
75

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
    • Schleswig-Holstein
      • Schenefeld, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, 22869
        • GSK Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Demonstrates understanding of the study procedures, restrictions and willingness to participate as evidenced by voluntary written informed consent and has received a signed and dated copy of the informed consent form.
  • Aged between 18- 65 years
  • Good general health with (in the opinion of the investigator) no clinically significant and relevant abnormalities of medical history or oral/dental examination. Absence of any condition that would impact on the participant's safety or wellbeing or affect the individual's ability to understand and follow study procedures and requirements.
  • Good dental health based on medical history and oral soft tissue examination at screening, a minimum of 20 permanent gradable teeth (Gradable teeth are those where restorative materials cover less than 25% of the tooth surface to be graded), and mean Turesky plaque score of ≥ 2.00 at Visit 1 and Visit 2 (pre-brushing plaque assessment).
  • Understands and is willing, able and likely to comply with all study procedures and restrictions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who are known to be pregnant or who are intending to become pregnant over the duration of the study.
  • Women who are breast-feeding.
  • Known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to the study materials (or closely related compounds) or any of their stated ingredients.
  • Participation in another clinical study: cosmetic studies within 14 days of the screening visit or receipt of an investigational drug within 30 days of the screening visit and previous participation in this study.
  • Recent history (within the last year) of alcohol or other substance abuse.
  • An employee of the sponsor or the study site or members of their immediate family and an employee of any toothpaste manufacturer or their immediate family.
  • Antibiotic treatment within 14 days prior to Visit 2 or throughout the study, any other treatment that would interfere with the study outcomes, at the discretion of the examiner or investigator.
  • High levels of extrinsic stain or calculus deposits which might interfere with plaque assessments at the discretion of the investigator, dental conditions / disease requiring immediate treatment, pre-existing sensitivity to oral care products, severe gingivitis that may, in the opinion of the investigator, compromise the study or the oral health of the participants if they participate in the study, presence of orthodontic bands or appliances, extensive crowns, partial dentures, or fixed retainers on the maxillary or mandibular teeth, active carious lesions needing immediate care, oral lesions/manifestations that would impact on the outcome of the study, presence of oral or peri-oral ulceration including herpetic lesions at the time of screening, have current active caries or periodontitis that may, in the opinion of the investigator, compromise the study or the oral health of the participants if they participate in the study, restorations in a poor state of repair that may, in the opinion of the investigator, compromise the study or the oral health of the participants if they participate in the study, use of a chlorhexidine mouthwash within 14 days of Visit 2 or through the study and current use of Listerine, Corsodyl or any antimicrobial mouth rinse or throughout the study.
  • Participant unwilling to abstain from using chewing tobacco (with or without tobacco) and Participant unwilling to abstain from smoking tobacco or E-cigarettes for 4 hours prior to all visits and until all dental assessments are completed at each visit.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Test Product 1
Participants will be instructed to dose a toothbrush with full ribbon of dentifrice. Participants will brush their teeth once for one timed minute.
Drug: 20% w/w sodium bicarbonate
Dentifrice containing 20% w/w sodium bicarbonate.
Experimental: Test Product 2
Participants will be instructed to dose a toothbrush with full ribbon of dentifrice. Participants will brush their teeth once for one timed minute.
Drug: 35% w/w sodium bicarbonate
Dentifrice containing 35% w/w sodium bicarbonate.
Experimental: Test Product 3
Participants will be instructed to dose a toothbrush with full ribbon of dentifrice. Participants will brush their teeth once for one timed minute.
Drug: 50% w/w sodium bicarbonate
Dentifrice containing 20% w/w sodium bicarbonate.
Active Comparator: Positive Control
Participants will be instructed to dose a toothbrush with full ribbon of dentifrice. Participants will brush their teeth once for one timed minute.
Drug: 67% w/w sodium bicarbonate
Dentifrice containing 67% w/w sodium bicarbonate.
Other: Negative Control
Participants will be instructed to dose a toothbrush with full ribbon of dentifrice. Participants will brush their teeth once for one timed minute.
Drug: 0% w/w sodium bicarbonate
Dentifrice containing 0% sodium bicarbonate and 1450 parts per million (ppm) fluoride.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline (Pre-brushing) After a Single Brushing Treatment (Post-brushing) Turesky Modification of Quigley Hein Plaque Index (TPI), Positive Control Versus [vs.] Negative Control
Time Frame: Up to 5 weeks
The dental examiner used Turesky Modification of the Quigley Hein Index to assess plaque on all gradable teeth.Overall plaque scores were calculated taking average over all tooth sites for participant.Plaque was first disclosed using dye solution followed by disclosing solution.They expectorated and rinsed with 10 milliliters (mL) water for 10 seconds (sec),expectorated again. Plaque was assessed with each tooth being divided into 6 areas including mesiofacial,facial,distofacial,mesiolingual,lingual,distolingual surfaces.Disclosed plaque was scored for each tooth surface separately as:0 No plaque;1 Slight flecks of plaque at cervical margin of the tooth;2 A thin continuous band of plaque(1 mm or smaller) at cervical margin of tooth;3 A band of plaque wider than 1 mm but covering less than 1/3 of the crown of tooth;4 Plaque covering at least 1/3 but less than 2/3 of crown of tooth;5 Plaque covering 2/3 or more of crown of tooth. Score range 0-5.Lower scores indicate less plaque area.
Up to 5 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline (Pre-brushing) After a Single Brushing Treatment (Post-brushing) Turesky Modification of Quigley Hein Plaque Index (Test Product 1, 2 and 3 vs Negative Control)
Time Frame: Up to 5 weeks
The dental examiner used Turesky Modification of the Quigley Hein Index to assess plaque on all gradable teeth.Overall plaque scores were calculated taking average over all tooth sites for participant.Plaque was first disclosed using dye solution followed by disclosing solution.They expectorated and rinsed with 10 mL of water for 10 sec,expectorated again. Plaque was assessed with each tooth being divided into 6 areas including mesiofacial,facial,distofacial,mesiolingual,lingual,distolingual surfaces.Disclosed plaque was scored for each tooth surface separately as:0 No plaque;1 Slight flecks of plaque at cervical margin of the tooth;2 A thin continuous band of plaque(1 mm or smaller) at cervical margin of tooth;3 A band of plaque wider than 1 mm but covering less than 1/3 of the crown of tooth;4 Plaque covering at least 1/3 but less than 2/3 of crown of tooth;5 Plaque covering 2/3 or more of crown of tooth. Score range 0-5.Lower scores indicate less plaque area.
Up to 5 weeks
Change From Baseline (Pre-brushing) After a Single Brushing Treatment (Post-brushing) Turesky Modification of Quigley Hein Plaque Index (Test Product 1, 2 and 3 vs Positive Control)
Time Frame: Up to 5 weeks
The dental examiner used Turesky Modification of the Quigley Hein Index to assess plaque on all gradable teeth.Overall plaque scores were calculated taking average over all tooth sites for participant.Plaque was first disclosed using dye solution followed by disclosing solution.They expectorated and rinsed with 10 mL of water for 10 sec,expectorated again. Plaque was assessed with each tooth being divided into 6 areas including mesiofacial,facial,distofacial,mesiolingual,lingual,distolingual surfaces.Disclosed plaque was scored for each tooth surface separately as:0 No plaque;1 Slight flecks of plaque at cervical margin of the tooth;2 A thin continuous band of plaque(1 mm or smaller) at cervical margin of tooth;3 A band of plaque wider than 1 mm but covering less than 1/3 of the crown of tooth;4 Plaque covering at least 1/3 but less than 2/3 of crown of tooth;5 Plaque covering 2/3 or more of crown of tooth.Score range 0-5.Lower scores indicate less plaque area.
Up to 5 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
GlaxoSmithKline

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 19, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 2, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 2, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 11, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 11, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 14, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 29, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 15, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 206886

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings