Computerized Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Assisted Life Management for Pain in Sickle Cell Disease (CALM-SCD)

October 6, 2020 updated by: Charles Jonassaint, University of Pittsburgh

A Three-arm Feasibility Study of Web- and Smartphone-delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy as an Adjunct to Opioid Pain Treatment Among Adults With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)

The primary aim of this study is to test the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a multimedia computerized cognitive behavioral therapy (cCBT) program for reducing SCD pain symptoms in a single-arm pilot pragmatic clinical trial. The investigators will recruit 40 SCD patients with chronic pain and/or on chronic opioid pain treatment and randomize them 3:1 to two groups (cCBT and e-Education respectively), randomizing unevenly in order to best gather feasibility data for the cCBT. Both groups will use a mobile app to track daily pain/mood. The cCBT group will receive sessions of the CALM-SCD program to complete via mobile device and will have weekly follow-up with a care coach. The Education group will receive online education modules to complete via mobile device and will also have weekly follow-up with a care coach. The primary outcomes of the trial include feasibility (recruitment, retention, provider and patient feedback) and acceptability (sessions completed) of the CALM-SCD program.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The objective of this study is to provide the experiences and data that will support a later, larger, and adequately powered effectiveness trial of the CALM-SCD, computerized cognitive behavioral therapy (cCBT) program. The investigators hypothesize that CALM-SCD is acceptable, i.e., patients will use it (90% of users will complete the first lesson within 3 months; 70% will complete³4 sessions; 50% of users will complete all 8 sessions), and feasible, i.e., the investigators can recruit >80% of patients approached, and >90% of enrolled participants will complete their 6-month follow-up assessment. The investigators will also have preliminary data on effectiveness and hypothesize that 70% of cCBT users will achieve a >50% decline in daily pain ratings.

The investigators will enroll 40 SCD patients at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) with chronic pain to either CALM-SCD or pain education (eEducation) and follow them for 12 months. Implementation of routine stress/pain screening in the UPMC Adult Sickle Cell Clinic allows investigators to identify patients with SCD who have chronic pain as indicated by self-report "I have had pain nearly every day for at least 3 months" or have been prescribed long-acting opioids for pain.

Following confirmation of protocol-eligibility and informed consent, investigators will provide all patients with a large-screen smartphone (unless the patient owns their own compatible large-screen smartphone) with a symptoms diary app, and GPS tracking features pre-installed; this will allow investigators to track pain and mood as well as any opioid or non-opioid pain treatments used by patients, and steps traveled.

Patients enrolled in the CALM-SCD group will complete at least 4 1-hour cCBT sessions over 3 months using their personal or study-provided smartphone. Because cCBT programs are less effective without a human support component, participants will also be introduced to a care coach (master's level student tech who will receive training in CBT) who will contact them on a weekly basis by phone/text for up to 3 months. The care coach will reinforce CBT materials and encourage engagement. Participants will have continued access to the program after first 3 months, but care coach support will only be available on an as-needed basis.

Patients enrolled in the eEducation group will receive pain education through online modules that they will be asked to complete using their study-provided smartphone. Each module includes learning tasks, a reading assignment, and a short quiz based on material. The education group will receive care coach contact on the same schedule as the cCBT group. The care coach will provide supportive therapy and encouragement to complete modules and apply the lessons to their daily life.

Patients who are not eligible or who are not randomized into one of the intervention arms of this study will serve as a comparison group to ensure we are treating a representative sample of patients. Further, patients who were eligible but were not randomized into one of the intervention arms will serve as a usual care control group.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
74

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15237
        • University of Pittsburgh

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • To be eligible for the study, patients must be 18 years of age or older, have a documented diagnosis of SCD (HgbSS, HgbSC, SB+Thal, or SBoThal), receive routine care at the UPMC Sickle Cell Clinic, and self-report chronic pain or have been prescribed long-acting opioids for pain.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to provide informed consent due to low literacy or cognitive difficulties

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Computerized CBT
Computerized cognitive behavioral therapy (cCBT) for pain via an integrated smartphone and web-based skills training program: The training plan will help users learn how to recognize negative thoughts and emotions, use cognitive skills and problem-solving, and apply coping behaviors such as distraction, activity scheduling, and relaxation. The cCBT arm emphasizes skills acquisition and learning through practice; thus, the program involves regular homework assignments, and follow-up with the care coach and social network about issues faced and what skills were or could be used. This intervention is consistent with the tailored behavioral services patients would receive individually or as a group when working with a psychologist or behavioral pain specialist.
Behavioral: cognitive behavioral therapy
CBT teaches users how to recognize negative thoughts and emotions, use cognitive skills and problem-solving, and apply coping behaviors such as distraction, activity scheduling, and relaxation.
Active Comparator: e-Education
Participants will receive pain education through online modules that they will be asked to complete using their personal or study-provided smartphone. Each module includes learning tasks, a reading assignment, and a short quiz based on material. The education group will receive care coach contact on the same schedule as the cCBT group. The care coach will provide supportive therapy and encouragement to complete modules and apply the lessons to their daily life.
Behavioral: eEducation
Pain and sickle cell disease education delivered through a mobile electronic device
No Intervention: Usual Care
Participants who are not eligible or who are not randomized into one of the intervention arms of this study will serve as a comparison group to ensure we are treating a representative sample of patients. Further, patients who were eligible but were not randomized into one of the intervention arms will serve as a usual care control group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability of cognitive behavioral therapy trial for participants
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of cCBT sessions completed
6 months
Feasibility of recruitment and enrollment into cognitive behavioral therapy trial
Time Frame: 3-6 months of open enrollment
Number of patients enrolled / number of patients screened and approached
3-6 months of open enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Average change in 0-10 VAS pain intensity over course of study
1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Pain interference
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
PROMIS Pain Interference
1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Depressive symptoms
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
PHQ-9 depression measure
1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Anxiety symptoms
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
GAD-7 anxiety scale
1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Pain Catastrophizing
1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Sickle Cell Self-efficacy Scale
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Self-efficacy
1, 3, 6, and 12 months
ASCQ-Me
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Quality of life measures
1, 3, 6, and 12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Activity space
Time Frame: 6 months
GPS activity tracking on the smartphone
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Pittsburgh

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Duke University
University of Washington
Vanderbilt University
University of Toronto

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Charles Jonassaint, PhD, University of Pittsburgh

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 28, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 20, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 20, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 24, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 8, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 6, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PRO17010378
  • K23HL135396 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

A public-use data set (PUD) will be available through our study website. The PUD will be a cleaned, de-identified copy that includes all enrolled participants. Sensitive, identifying, unreliable, or invalid data will be excluded.

Researchers may request a copy of the PUD electronically from the Clinical Research Services at the University of Pittsburgh, conditional upon receiving IRB approval for a research proposal from their home institution.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on cognitive behavioral therapy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings