A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of JZP-258 in Subjects With Narcolepsy With Cataplexy

November 10, 2020 updated by: Jazz Pharmaceuticals

A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized-Withdrawal, Multicenter Study of the Efficacy and Safety of JZP-258 in Subjects With Narcolepsy With Cataplexy

This is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized-withdrawal, multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of JZP-258.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Subjects will be transitioned to JZP-258 based on their treatment status at study entry. All subjects will begin JZP-258 treatment at the beginning of this period and continue through Week 12. They will be treated with JZP-258 alone for the final two weeks of this 12-week period. Once the JZP-258 dose has been optimized per the Investigator's judgment, these subjects may enter the 2-week Stable-Dose Period with that dose. Subjects are eligible to enter the Double-Blind Randomized-Withdrawal Period if the dose of JZP-258 remains unchanged during the Stable-Dose Period and, in the judgment of the Investigator, no clinically significant worsening in narcolepsy symptoms or clinically significant adverse events due to JZP-258 treatment have occurred. Subjects will return for a Safety Follow-up visit 2 weeks after the Double-Blind Randomized-Withdrawal Period. Subjects who complete the double-blind treatment period during the Main Study are eligible to enter a 24-week Open-Label Extension. During this period subjects will receive open label JZP-258. Subjects will return for a Safety Follow-up visit 2 weeks after the Open-Label Extension Period.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
201

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Belgium
      • Edegem, Belgium, 2650
        • UZ Antwerpen
      • Gent, Belgium, 9000
        • Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
        • UZ Leuven
  • Czechia
      • Ostrava-Poruba, Czechia, 70800
        • Fakultni nemocnice Ostrava
      • Praha 2, Czechia, 128 21
        • Vseobecna fakultni nemocnice v Praze
  • Finland
      • Helsinki, Finland, 00380
        • Helsingin Uniklinikka, Vitalmed Oy
  • France
      • Lille, France, 59037
        • Hopital Roger Salengro - CHU Lille
    • Herault
      • Montpellier, Herault, France, 34295
        • Hôpital Gui de Chauliac
  • Spain
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08035
        • Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08036
        • Hospital Clinic i Provincial de Barcelona
      • Castelló, Spain, 12004
        • Hospital General de Castellón
      • Madrid, Spain, 28036
        • Instituto de Investigaciones del Sueño
      • Madrid, Spain, 28043
        • Hospital Vithas Nuestra Senora de America
  • United States
    • California
      • Orange, California, United States, 92858
        • SDS Clinical Trials, Inc.
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford Health Services
    • Colorado
      • Boulder, Colorado, United States, 80301
        • Colorado Sleep Institute
    • Florida
      • Kissimmee, Florida, United States, 34741
        • Pulmonary Disease Specialists
    • Indiana
      • Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States, 46804
        • Fort Wayne Neurological Center
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40218
        • Kentucky Research Group
    • Maryland
      • Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States, 20815
        • Center for Sleep & Wake Disorders
    • New York
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10467
        • Montefiore/ Sleep-Wake Disorders Center
    • North Carolina
      • Gastonia, North Carolina, United States, 94305
        • Gastonia Medical Specialty Clinic
      • Huntersville, North Carolina, United States, 28078
        • Research Carolina
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45245
        • Intrepid Research
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic, Sleep Disorder Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female subjects between 18 and 70 years of age, inclusive.
  2. Have a primary diagnosis of narcolepsy with cataplexy that meets ICSD-3 criteria or DSM-5 criteria, and currently untreated or treated with or without anticataplectics.
  3. If applicable, treated with a stimulant or alerting agent at unchanged doses for at least 2 months prior to dosing or not treated with a stimulant or alerting agent.
  4. Willing and able to comply with the study design schedule and other requirements.
  5. Willing and able to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Narcolepsy secondary to another medical condition (e.g., CNS injury or lesion)
  2. History or presence of any unstable or clinically significant medical condition, behavioral or psychiatric disorder (including active suicidal ideation), or history or presence of another neurological disorder or surgical history that might affect the subject's safety and/or interfere with the conduct of the study in the opinion of the Investigator.
  3. Treatment with any central nervous system sedating agents, including but not limited to benzodiazepines, nonbenzodiazepine anxiolytics/ hypnotics/sedatives, neuroleptics, opioids, barbiturates, phenytoin, ethosuximide, or MCT inhibitors, e.g. diclofenac, valproate, ibuprofen, within 2 weeks prior to enrollment (discontinuation for the purpose of study enrollment is permitted only if considered safe by the Investigator and approved by the Medical Monitor).
  4. Treatment with an antidepressant for cataplexy, if the withdrawal of the antidepressant during cross-titration with JZP-258 might be unsafe due to prior history of depression.
  5. Unsafe for the subject to receive placebo treatment for 2 weeks, in the opinion of the Investigator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Other: Placebo
Matching placebo solution (aqueous solution containing sodium citrate, malic acid, and sucralose; all ingredients were compendial [United States Pharmacopeia/ National Formulary])
Experimental: JZP-258
Drug: JZP-258
JZP-258 oral solution 0.5 g/mL, which is equivalent to 0.413 g/mL of oxybate
Other Names:
  • Xyrem®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Weekly Number of Cataplexy Attacks
Time Frame: Change from baseline (2 weeks of the Stable Dose Period) to the 2 weeks of the Double Blind Randomized Withdrawal Period (DB RWP)
Participants completed a daily Cataplexy Frequency Diary each night prior to bedtime. Participants were to record the number of cataplexy attacks that they had each day.
Change from baseline (2 weeks of the Stable Dose Period) to the 2 weeks of the Double Blind Randomized Withdrawal Period (DB RWP)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Score
Time Frame: From the end of the Stable Dose Period to the end of the Double Blind Randomized Withdrawal Period
This is the key secondary endpoint. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) was a self-administered questionnaire with 8 questions. Participants were asked to rate, on a 4-point scale (0-3), their usual chances of dozing off or falling asleep while engaged in eight different activities. Most participants engaged in those activities at least occasionally, although not necessarily every day. The ESS score (the sum of 8 item scores, 0-3) can range from 0 to 24. The higher the ESS score, the higher that participants average sleep propensity in daily life (ASP), or their 'daytime sleepiness'.
From the end of the Stable Dose Period to the end of the Double Blind Randomized Withdrawal Period
Number of Participants With Worsening Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIc) for Narcolepsy Overall
Time Frame: At the end of the Double Blind Randomized Withdrawal Period
At the end of the Double Blind Randomized Withdrawal Period (DB RWP), participants rated the change in their condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 = "very much improved" to 7 = "very much worse" since the last visit. This endpoint measures the percentage of participants with worsening PGIc scores for narcolepsy overall (defined as scores of Much Worse or Very Much Worse).
At the end of the Double Blind Randomized Withdrawal Period
Number of Participants With Worsening Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIc) for Narcolepsy Overall
Time Frame: At the end of the Double Blind Randomized Withdrawal Period
At the end of the Double Blind Randomized Withdrawal Period, Investigators rated their impression of any change in the severity of the participant's narcolepsy overall condition since the start of the Double Blind Randomized Withdrawal Period on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 = "very much improved" to 7 = "very much worse". This endpoint measures the percentage of participants with worsening CGIc scores for narcolepsy overall, defined as scores of Much Worse or Very Much Worse.
At the end of the Double Blind Randomized Withdrawal Period
Change in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Scores
Time Frame: At the End of the Stable Dose Period to the End of the Double Blind Randomized Withdrawal Period
The SF-36v2 is a multi-purpose, short-form health survey with 36 questions/ items. It yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores as well as a psychometrically-based physical and mental overall component summary measures. Two summary scores were derived using the SF-36v2. Physical Component Summary measures dimensions of functional health that are meaningful to respondents, including the impact of health and health-related changes on physical function, pain, and the ability to carry out daily roles. The Mental Component Summary component scale measures the impact of health and health-related changes on well-being, including vitality, social function, and emotional well-being. Participants self-report on items in a summary that have between 2-6 choices per item (e.g. none of the time, some of the time, etc.). Summations of item scores were transformed into a range from 0 to 100; zero= worst HRQL, 100=best HRQL. Higher scores indicate better health status.
At the End of the Stable Dose Period to the End of the Double Blind Randomized Withdrawal Period
Change in 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) Crosswalk Index Score and Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: At the End of the Stable Dose Period to the End of the Double Blind Randomized Withdrawal Period
The EQ-5D-5L is a measure of health outcome that includes a descriptive system consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/ discomfort, and anxiety/ depression). The EQ-5D-5L includes 5 levels of severity for each of the 5 dimensions of the descriptive system (1= no problems, 2= slight problems, 3= moderate problems, 4= severe problems, and 5= extreme problems) that reflect increasing levels of difficulty. The 5 digit health states for each dimension are converted into a single value per country (0= equivalent to death, 1= equivalent to best imaginable health and values below 0= health states rated worse than death capped at -1), using the EQ-5D-5L crosswalk index value calculator as recommended by EuroQol group. A visual analogue scale (VAS) used within this scale recorded the participants self-rated health on a VAS and the endpoints resulted in a numeric value set ranging from 0 (= worst imaginable health state) up to 100 (= best imaginable health state).
At the End of the Stable Dose Period to the End of the Double Blind Randomized Withdrawal Period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Jazz Pharmaceuticals

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Director Clinical Trial Disclosure & Transparency, Jazz Pharmaceuticals

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 14, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 24, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 10, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 23, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 24, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 25, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 12, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 10, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 15-006
  • 2016-000426-20 (EudraCT Number)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Narcolepsy With Cataplexy

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings