Transporters for Organic Cations and Glycemic Control in Patients With Neuropathic Pain.

July 1, 2019 updated by: Natalia Valadares de Moraes

Gabapentin Kinetic Disposition and Renal Excretion: Role of Transporters for Organic Cations and the Effect of Glycemic Control in Patients With Neuropathic Pain.

This study aimed to investigate the influence of the glycemic control of type 2 diabetes (DM2) and of cetirizine (OCTs inhibitor) on gabapentin kinetics disposition and pharmacodynamics (PK-PD) in patients with neuropathic pain. Thus, non-diabetic patients (Control Group, n=10), patients with controlled diabetes (n=9) and patients with uncontrolled diabetes (n=10), all with neuropathic pain of intensity ≥ 4 in pain visual analog scale (0-10) were investigated.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Gabapentin (GBP), anticonvulsant used to neuropathic pain treatment, is mainly eliminated unchanged in urine. Renal active tubular secretion has been suggested to contribute on GBP excretion by renal excretion. Studies performed on rats with experimental diabetes suggest that hyperglycemia reduces the activity of organic cation transporters (Oct). Thus, the aim of the study was to investigate the role of OCTs on kinetic disposition and pharmacodynamics of GBP in patients with neuropathic pain and to verify the regulation of these transporters' activity by glycemic control in diabetes. A cross-over clinical study was performed in patients with neuropathic pain (n=10, Control) to evaluate the influence of CTZ on GBP kinetic disposition. To evaluate the effect of glycemic control, patients with controlled DM2 (DC, n=9) and uncontrolled DM2 (DNC, n=10) were investigated. All participants investigated had neuropathic pain of intensity ≥ 4 evaluated by analogue visual scale (EVA) and were treated with oral single-dose of 300 mg of GBP (Phase 1) or cetirizine (20 mg/day) for 5 days and single-dose of GBP on the last day (Phase 2). Only participants of Control group participated of Phase 2. Serial blood and urine samples were collected up to 36 hours after GBP administration. The intensity of pain was evaluated at the same time of blood sampling, using the visual analog scale. GBP concentration in plasma and urine was validated by JPLC-UV. All participants were genotyped for polymorphisms SLC22A2 808G>T and SLC22A4 1507C>T. The pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by non-compartmental analysis.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
29

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 59 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients, both gender
  • Patients with neuropathic pain with score ≥ 4 in visual analog scale
  • Patients with controlled type 2 diabetes (glycated hemoglobin ≤ 8.0%) and diabetic neuropathy with score ≥ 4 in visual analog scale
  • Patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (glycated hemoglobin ≥ 8.0%) and diabetic neuropathy with score ≥ 4 in visual analog scale
  • Patients that suspend the use of analgesics for 10 times half-life before starting the protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with acute or chronicle severe renal failure (creatinine clearance ≤ 30 mL/min)
  • Patients with gastrointestinal diseases
  • Patients with history of alcohol and drug abuse
  • Patients with acute myocardial insufficiency
  • Patients with another kind of chronicle pain as severe as neuropathic pain
  • Patients in chronicle use of drugs that interact with gabapentin (antacids and cimetidine)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Control Group
Adult patients (18 - 59 years old) with neuropathic pain of score ≥ 4 that do not use gabapentin were recruited. All patients received oral single dose of gabapentin (300 mg) as capsules after 12 hour-fasting (phase I). To investigate GBP pharmacokinetics, blood samples were collected in heparinized tubes up to 36 hours after GBP administration. The urine of the patients was collected up to 36 hours after GBP administration. The intensity of pain was evaluated in each time of blood sampling through the visual analog scale (0-10). In phase II, after 15 days (wash-out) from phase I, cetirizine hydrochloride (10 mg) was administered orally, twice a day, as pills, for five days. On the last day of cetirizine treatment, an oral single dose of gabapentin (300 mg), as capsule, was administered. Serial blood and urine samples were collected up to 36 hours after GBP administration. The intensity of pain was evaluated in each time of blood sampling.
Procedure: Serial Blood Samples
Serial blood samples were collected at times 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24 and 36 hours after gabapentin administration, for all patients.
Procedure: Serial Urine Samples
Serial urine samples were collected at intervals 0-8 hours, 8-16 hours, 16-24 hours and 24-36 hours after gabapentin administration, for all patients.
Drug: Gabapentin 300 mg
All patients were treated with oral single dose of gabapentin 300 mg.
Drug: Cetirizine Hydrochloride 10 mg
Patients of control group were treated with cetirizine hydrochloride, 10 mg, twice as day, orally, for five days.
Experimental: Controlled Diabetes Group
Adult patients (18 - 59 years old) with controlled type 2 diabetes (glycated hemoglobin ≤ 8.0%) and diabetic neuropathy of score ≥ 4 that do not use gabapentin were recruited. All patients received oral single dose of gabapentin (300 mg) as capsules after 12 hour-fasting. To investigate GBP pharmacokinetics, blood samples were collected in heparinized tubes up to 36 hours after GBP administration. The urine of the patients was collected up to 36 hours after GBP administration. The intensity of pain was evaluated in each time of blood sampling through the visual analog scale (0-10).
Procedure: Serial Blood Samples
Serial blood samples were collected at times 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24 and 36 hours after gabapentin administration, for all patients.
Procedure: Serial Urine Samples
Serial urine samples were collected at intervals 0-8 hours, 8-16 hours, 16-24 hours and 24-36 hours after gabapentin administration, for all patients.
Drug: Gabapentin 300 mg
All patients were treated with oral single dose of gabapentin 300 mg.
Experimental: Uncontrolled Diabetes Group
Adult patients (18 - 59 years old) with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (glycated hemoglobin ≥ 8.0%) and diabetic neuropathy of score ≥ 4 that do not use gabapentin were recruited. All patients received oral single dose of gabapentin (300 mg) as capsules after 12 hour-fasting. To investigate GBP pharmacokinetics, blood samples were collected in heparinized tubes up to 36 hours after GBP administration. The urine of the patients was collected up to 36 hours after GBP administration. The intensity of pain was evaluated in each time of blood sampling through the visual analog scale (0-10).
Procedure: Serial Blood Samples
Serial blood samples were collected at times 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24 and 36 hours after gabapentin administration, for all patients.
Procedure: Serial Urine Samples
Serial urine samples were collected at intervals 0-8 hours, 8-16 hours, 16-24 hours and 24-36 hours after gabapentin administration, for all patients.
Drug: Gabapentin 300 mg
All patients were treated with oral single dose of gabapentin 300 mg.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pharmacokinetic parameter (AUC)
Time Frame: Up to 36 hours after gabapentin (300 mg) administration
Area under the plasma concentration versus time (AUC)
Up to 36 hours after gabapentin (300 mg) administration

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pharmacokinetic parameter (Total clearance)
Time Frame: Up to 36 hours after gabapentin (300 mg) administration
Total clearance
Up to 36 hours after gabapentin (300 mg) administration
Pharmacokinetic parameter (Renal clearance)
Time Frame: Up to 36 hours after gabapentin (300 mg) administration
Renal clearance
Up to 36 hours after gabapentin (300 mg) administration
Pharmacokinetic parameter (Vd)
Time Frame: Up to 36 hours after gabapentin (300 mg) administration
Volume of distribution (Vd)
Up to 36 hours after gabapentin (300 mg) administration
Pharmacokinetic parameter (Elimination half-life)
Time Frame: Up to 36 hours after gabapentin (300 mg) administration
Elimination half-life
Up to 36 hours after gabapentin (300 mg) administration

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Natalia Valadares de Moraes

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Sao Paulo

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 2, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 7, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 8, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 5, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 1, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • GBPDIABETCET

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings