The Role of Trans-spinal Direct Current Stimulation (tsDCS) in Treating Patients With Hand Spasticity After Stroke

March 8, 2021 updated by: Bruce Volpe, Northwell Health

The Effect of Treatment With the PathMaker Myoregulator Neuromodulation System Incorporating Trans-spinal Direct Current Stimulation (tsDCS) in Patients With Severe Hand Spasticity After Stroke

The purpose of this study is to evaluate if 5 consecutive sessions of PathMaker anodal DoubleStim treatment, which combines non-invasive stimulation of the spinal cord (tsDCS- trans-spinal direct current stimulation) and of the median nerve at the peripheral wrist (pDCS-- peripheral direct current stimulation), can significantly reduce spasticity of the wrist and hand after stroke.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
26

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • Manhasset, New York, United States, 11030
        • Feinstein Institute for Medical Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. First single focal unilateral hemisphere lesion with diagnosis verified by brain imaging (MRI or CT scans) that occurred at least 6 months prior
  2. Cognitive function sufficient to understand the experiments and follow instructions
  3. A Modified Ashworth Scale score between 1-3 points for wrist flexor and extensor muscles
  4. A minimum of 15 degrees wrist passive range of motion (ROM) for wrist flexion and extension from wrist neutral position

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Focal brainstem or thalamic infarcts
  2. Prior surgical treatments for spasticity of the upper limb
  3. Ongoing use of central nervous system (CNS)-active medications
  4. Ongoing use of psychoactive medications, such as stimulants, antidepressants, and anti-psychotic medications
  5. Botox or phenol alcohol treatment within 12 weeks of enrollment
  6. Pregnancy in women, as determined by self-report
  7. History of spinal cord injury or weakness
  8. Chronic pain
  9. Peripheral neuropathy including insulin dependent diabetes as determined by case history

  10. Presence of additional potential tsDCS risk factors:

    • Damaged skin at the site of stimulation (i.e., skin with ingrown hairs, acne, razor nicks, wounds that have not healed recent scar tissue, broken skin, etc.)
    • Presence of an electrically, magnetically or mechanically activated implant (including cardiac pacemaker), an intracerebral vascular clip, or any other electrically sensitive support system
    • Highly conductive metal in any part of the body, including metal injury to the eye (jewelry must be removed during stimulation)
    • Past history of seizures or unexplained spells of loss of consciousness during the previous 36 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Sham Doublestim
Participants first received 5 daily, consecutive 20 min sessions of sham Doublestim (trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation). After a washout period of 1 week, they then received 5 daily, consecutive 20 min sessions of anodal Doublestim (trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation). For all participants, the sham condition preceded the anodal Doublestim condition.
Device: sham Doublestim
PathMaker MyoRegulator device
Other Names:
  • sham trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation (tsDCS + pDCS)
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Anodal Doublestim
Participants first received 5 daily, consecutive 20 min sessions of sham Doublestim (trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation). After a washout period of 1 week, they then received 5 daily, consecutive 20 min sessions of anodal Doublestim (trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation). For all participants, the sham condition preceded the anodal Doublestim condition.
Device: anodal Doublestim
PathMaker MyoRegulator device
Other Names:
  • anodal trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation (tsDCS + pDCS)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Area Under the Curve for Objectively Measured Spastic Catch Response of the Wrist Flexors at Fast Speed
Time Frame: baseline, final session at day 5, 1 week FU
Subjects' wrists were passively extended at fast speed by a stepper motor to induce a spastic catch response, and its resistance torque was calculated in Newton meters (Nm). Mean percent change from baseline in the area under the curve for the resistance torque were compared across two timepoints (final session at day 5 and 1 week follow-up) in two conditions (sham vs. anodal Doublestim)
baseline, final session at day 5, 1 week FU

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS) Score
Time Frame: baseline, final session at day 5, 1 week FU
The Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS) quantifies muscle spasticity for each joint at slow and fast velocities on a 0-5 point scale. MTS scores at fast velocity were summed across 11 joints of the upper extremity (for a total of 0-55 points), with lower scores indicating improved spasticity. Mean summed MTS scores (out of 55 total points) were compared across two timepoints (final session at day 5 and 1 week FU) in two conditions (sham vs. anodal Doublestim).
baseline, final session at day 5, 1 week FU

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Northwell Health

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
PathMaker Neurosystems Inc.
Dr. Zaghloul Ahmed

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 6, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 9, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 15, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 5, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 8, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 15-110

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings