The Role of Trans-spinal Direct Current Stimulation (tsDCS) in Treating Patients With Hand Spasticity After Stroke

March 8, 2021 updated by: Bruce Volpe, Northwell Health

The Effect of Treatment With the PathMaker Myoregulator Neuromodulation System Incorporating Trans-spinal Direct Current Stimulation (tsDCS) in Patients With Severe Hand Spasticity After Stroke

The purpose of this study is to evaluate if 5 consecutive sessions of PathMaker anodal DoubleStim treatment, which combines non-invasive stimulation of the spinal cord (tsDCS- trans-spinal direct current stimulation) and of the median nerve at the peripheral wrist (pDCS-- peripheral direct current stimulation), can significantly reduce spasticity of the wrist and hand after stroke.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Manhasset, New York, United States, 11030
        • Feinstein Institute for Medical Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. First single focal unilateral hemisphere lesion with diagnosis verified by brain imaging (MRI or CT scans) that occurred at least 6 months prior
  2. Cognitive function sufficient to understand the experiments and follow instructions
  3. A Modified Ashworth Scale score between 1-3 points for wrist flexor and extensor muscles
  4. A minimum of 15 degrees wrist passive range of motion (ROM) for wrist flexion and extension from wrist neutral position

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Focal brainstem or thalamic infarcts
  2. Prior surgical treatments for spasticity of the upper limb
  3. Ongoing use of central nervous system (CNS)-active medications
  4. Ongoing use of psychoactive medications, such as stimulants, antidepressants, and anti-psychotic medications
  5. Botox or phenol alcohol treatment within 12 weeks of enrollment
  6. Pregnancy in women, as determined by self-report
  7. History of spinal cord injury or weakness
  8. Chronic pain
  9. Peripheral neuropathy including insulin dependent diabetes as determined by case history
  10. Presence of additional potential tsDCS risk factors:

    • Damaged skin at the site of stimulation (i.e., skin with ingrown hairs, acne, razor nicks, wounds that have not healed recent scar tissue, broken skin, etc.)
    • Presence of an electrically, magnetically or mechanically activated implant (including cardiac pacemaker), an intracerebral vascular clip, or any other electrically sensitive support system
    • Highly conductive metal in any part of the body, including metal injury to the eye (jewelry must be removed during stimulation)
    • Past history of seizures or unexplained spells of loss of consciousness during the previous 36 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Sham Doublestim
Participants first received 5 daily, consecutive 20 min sessions of sham Doublestim (trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation). After a washout period of 1 week, they then received 5 daily, consecutive 20 min sessions of anodal Doublestim (trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation). For all participants, the sham condition preceded the anodal Doublestim condition.
PathMaker MyoRegulator device
Other Names:
  • sham trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation (tsDCS + pDCS)
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Anodal Doublestim
Participants first received 5 daily, consecutive 20 min sessions of sham Doublestim (trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation). After a washout period of 1 week, they then received 5 daily, consecutive 20 min sessions of anodal Doublestim (trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation). For all participants, the sham condition preceded the anodal Doublestim condition.
PathMaker MyoRegulator device
Other Names:
  • anodal trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation (tsDCS + pDCS)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Area Under the Curve for Objectively Measured Spastic Catch Response of the Wrist Flexors at Fast Speed
Time Frame: baseline, final session at day 5, 1 week FU
Subjects' wrists were passively extended at fast speed by a stepper motor to induce a spastic catch response, and its resistance torque was calculated in Newton meters (Nm). Mean percent change from baseline in the area under the curve for the resistance torque were compared across two timepoints (final session at day 5 and 1 week follow-up) in two conditions (sham vs. anodal Doublestim)
baseline, final session at day 5, 1 week FU

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS) Score
Time Frame: baseline, final session at day 5, 1 week FU
The Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS) quantifies muscle spasticity for each joint at slow and fast velocities on a 0-5 point scale. MTS scores at fast velocity were summed across 11 joints of the upper extremity (for a total of 0-55 points), with lower scores indicating improved spasticity. Mean summed MTS scores (out of 55 total points) were compared across two timepoints (final session at day 5 and 1 week FU) in two conditions (sham vs. anodal Doublestim).
baseline, final session at day 5, 1 week FU

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 15, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 5, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on sham Doublestim

Subscribe