Concurrent Involved-field Radiotherapy and Intrathecal Chemotherapy for Leptomeningeal Metastases From Solid Tumors

July 30, 2019 updated by: Zhenyu Pan, The First Hospital of Jilin University

Involved-field Radiotherapy Combined With Concurrent Intrathecal-MTX Versus Intrathecal-Ara-C for Leptomeningeal Metastases From Solid Tumor: A Randomized Phase II Clinical Trial

It has been proved that concurrent radiotherapy (RT) and intrathecal methotrexate (MTX) for leptomeningeal metastases (LM) from solid tumors with adverse prognostic factors showed great effectiveness and safety. Cytarabine(Ara-C) is another agent which is commonly used for intrathecal chemotherapy. The purpose of the study is to observe the effectiveness and safety of concurrent RT and intrathecal chemotherapy for LM from solid tumors. In addition, the effectiveness of these two types of agents (MTX and Ara-C) in the concurrent chemo-radiotherapy will be compared in this study. This is a randomized controlled, parallel group, and phase II clinical trial. The object of this study is newly diagnosis patients with leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors, who will accept the treatment of involved-field RT combined with concurrent intrathecal-MTX or intrathecal-Ara-C, respectively. Major endpoint is clinical response rate. Secondary endpoints are time to progression,severe adverse events and overall survival.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The patients were randomly divided into two groups, who will accept the treatment of involved-field RT combined with concurrent intrathecal-MTX or intrathecal-Ara-C, respectively. Concomitant regimen consisted of intrathecal chemotherapy (via lumbar puncture, MTX 15 mg, plus dexamethasone 5 mg, or Ara-C 50mg, plus dexamethasone 5 mg, once per week, 4 weeks in total) and RT. RT consisted of fractionated, conformal radiation given at a daily dose of 2 Gy. The planning volume consisted of sites of symptomatic disease, bulky disease observed on MRI, including the whole brain and basis cranii received 40 Gy in 20 fractions and/or segment of spinal canal received 40-50 Gy. The RANO proposal for response criteria of LM disease was used to assess the clinical response in this study.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
53

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Jilin
      • Changchun, Jilin, China, 130021
        • The First Hospital of Jilin University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who have been definitely diagnosed as leptomeningeal metastasis according to cerebrospinal fluid cytology or neuroimaging, or patients who got the clinical diagnosis by combining with the history of cancer, clinical manifestation, cerebrospinal fluid examination, neuroimaging etc;
  2. Patients who have been diagnosed as malignant solid tumor with definite pathologic type, excluding hematological malignancies (e.g., leukemia and lymphoma) or primary brain tumors;
  3. No severe abnormal liver and kidney function; WBC≥2500/mm3, Plt≥60000/mm3;
  4. No other severe chronic diseases;
  5. No history of severe nervous system disease;
  6. No severe dyscrasia;
  7. Signed informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with leptomeningeal metastasis from unknown primary tumor;
  2. Patients who had received radiotherapy to the brain in the past 6 months;
  3. Patients who had accepted systemic chemotherapy within one month before the treatment, or molecular targeted therapy less than 3 months;
  4. Patients with poor compliance, or for other reasons, the researchers considered unsuitable to participate in this clinical study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Group 1: RT-Intra-MTX
Intrathecal chemotherapy: MTX 15 mg, plus dexamethasone 5 mg, via lumbar puncture,once per week, 4 weeks in total.
Drug: MTX
MTX 15 mg,via lumbar puncture,once per week, 4 weeks in total
Other Names:
  • Intrathecal chemotherapy
Radiation: Radiotherapy
The sites of symptomatic disease, bulky disease observed on MRI, including the whole brain and basis cranii, 40 Gy in 20 fractions;and/or segment of spinal canal received 40-50 Gy in 20-25 fractions.
Experimental: Group2: RT-Intra-Ara-C
Intrathecal chemotherapy:Ara-C 50 mg, plus dexamethasone 5 mg, via lumbar puncture, once per week, 4 weeks in total.
Radiation: Radiotherapy
The sites of symptomatic disease, bulky disease observed on MRI, including the whole brain and basis cranii, 40 Gy in 20 fractions;and/or segment of spinal canal received 40-50 Gy in 20-25 fractions.
Drug: Ara-C
Ara-C 50mg,via lumbar puncture,once per week, 4 weeks in total
Other Names:
  • Intrathecal chemotherapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Response Rate (CRR)
Time Frame: The evaluation was performed once per week from the beginning of LM-related therapy, till 4 weeks later after concomitant therapy.
The RANO proposal for response criteria of LM disease was used to assess the clinical response in this study.
The evaluation was performed once per week from the beginning of LM-related therapy, till 4 weeks later after concomitant therapy.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of severe adverse events (SAE)
Time Frame: At least 7 months after LM diagnosis or until death.
Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, version 4.03). Events of grade 3-5 was defined as moderate and severe adverse events.
At least 7 months after LM diagnosis or until death.
Overall survival(OS)
Time Frame: At least 7 months after LM diagnosis or until death.
Survival time was recorded since the date of patient enrollment. All patients were followed up until death or the end of the study.
At least 7 months after LM diagnosis or until death.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
The First Hospital of Jilin University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Zhenyu Pan, Professor, The First Hospital of Jilin University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 30, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 5, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 10, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 17, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 1, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 30, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MVARTICLM

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings