BBOT: Bacterial Burden in Ortho Trauma Procedures

April 16, 2020 updated by: Robert O'Toole, University of Maryland, Baltimore

Prospective Evaluation of Bacterial Burden in Orthopaedic Trauma Procedures Using Highly Sensitive Assays

The purpose of this research project is to improve understanding of the potential role of highly sensitive bacterial tests in diagnosing infected non-healing fractures compared to the current standard of care, microbiologic culture (growing bacteria from tissue specimens in the laboratory).

In order to understand the validity of the highly sensitive tests, parameters of the test in different groups of patients must be established. This study is examining how two highly sensitive tests compare to each other and to the standard of care (microbiologic culture) in three groups of patients.

Group 1 is clean broken bone surgery undergoing plate and screw fixation, intramedullary nailing fixation where the fracture site is accessible, or staged treatment of a broken bones initially treated by joint spanning external fixation device. Group 2 will include patients having a plate and screws removed without clinical evidence of infection. Group 3 will be patients undergoing an initial procedure for fracture nonunion.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Infected, broken bones that do not heal are a difficult clinical problem that significantly affect patient quality of life. Current methodology for detecting bacteria (growth in laboratory cultures) is inadequate to detect infections caused by bacteria existing in a biofilm, which is the layer of "slime" found in the presence of foreign bodies (eg, implanted metal devices to fix broken bones). Advances in molecular biology have allowed development of highly sensitive tests to detect bacteria in the biofilm state. However, the limited prior research has not included control groups or compared the performance of different highly sensitive tests. To address these limitations and further define the role of highly sensitive bacterial tests in clinical practice, the investigators hypothesize that there will be increasing bacterial burden when comparing clean broken bone surgery (1st surgery) to implanted metal device removal (2nd surgery, bone healed) to index nonunion surgery (subsequent surgery, bone not healed) as measured by percentage of cases being positive for bacteria using highly sensitive bacterial tests. Further, the highly sensitive bacterial tests (Illumina MiSeq system and Ibis T5000 biosensor) will have similar ability to quantify the number of bacteria and differentiate bacterial species. Eligible patients will consist of three groups. Group 1 is clean broken bone surgery undergoing plate and screw fixation, intramedullary nailing fixation where the fracture site is accessible, or staged treatment of a broken bones initially treated by joint spanning external fixation device. Group 2 will include patients having a plate and screws removed without clinical evidence of infection. Group 3 will be patients undergoing an initial procedure for fracture nonunion. Tissue obtained at the time of surgery will be sent to the research laboratory for culture and performance of the two highly sensitive tests. The tissue samples taken will be tissue normally removed and discarded in the course of these particular procedures. The rates of positivity for culture and the highly sensitive tests will be compared amongst the three groups. Investigators will also compare bacterial count and the distribution of bacterial species found using the two highly sensitive tests. These data will then undergo statistical analysis against clinical data gathered from review of the patients' charts. The overall project goal is to establish the clinical relevance of highly sensitive bacterial tests in diagnosing infected nonunions. The ability to more accurately identify patients with infection may lead to a change in clinical decision making with respect to surgical procedure or antibiotic treatment. This project will develop an improved understanding of the potential role of highly sensitive bacterial tests in diagnosing infected nonunions compared to the current standard of care, which is growing bacteria in the laboratory under artificial conditions.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
142

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
        • University of Maryland, Shock Trauma Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Closed fracture undergoing open reduction internal fixation, intramedullary nailing (IMN) where the fracture site is accessible, or staged treatment of a pilon or plateau that was initially treated by joint spanning external fixation.
  • Plate and screw removal without clinical evidence of infection
  • Index procedure for fracture nonunion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Index fracture surgery for an open fracture or intramedullary nailing with fracture site not accessible
  • Hardware removal if fracture not already healed
  • Index nonunion surgery being bone grafting of a 'critical' defect
  • Pregnant females

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
OTHER: Group 1: Closed Index Fractures
Group 1 is clean, closed fractures undergoing index open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), intramedullary nailing (IMN) where the fracture site is accessible, or staged treatment of a pilon or plateau that was initially treated by joint spanning external fixation. Tissue obtained at the time of surgery will be sent to the research laboratory for culture and performance of the two highly sensitive assays.
Diagnostic test: Highly Sensitive Assays
Tissue will be collected at the time of surgery from patients in each arm of the study. In addition to tissue stored in RNAlater and sent to a research laboratory, cultures will also be sent to Quest Diagnostics for independent culture results.
Other Names:
  • Ibis T5000 biosensor
  • Illumina MiSeq system
OTHER: Group 2: Hardware Removal from Healed Fractures
Group 2 will include patients having a plate removed from a healed fracture without clinical evidence of infection and excluding history of open fracture. Tissue obtained at the time of surgery will be sent to the research laboratory for culture and performance of the two highly sensitive assays.
Diagnostic test: Highly Sensitive Assays
Tissue will be collected at the time of surgery from patients in each arm of the study. In addition to tissue stored in RNAlater and sent to a research laboratory, cultures will also be sent to Quest Diagnostics for independent culture results.
Other Names:
  • Ibis T5000 biosensor
  • Illumina MiSeq system
OTHER: Group 3: Index Treatment of Fracture Nonunions
Group 3 will be patients that are undergoing an index procedure for fracture nonunion at a site where prior surgery has been undertaken for the fracture. Exclusions include bone grafting of 'critical' defects, active clinical infection, or < 3 months from index fracture fixation. Tissue obtained at the time of surgery will be sent to the research laboratory for culture and performance of the two highly sensitive assays.
Diagnostic test: Highly Sensitive Assays
Tissue will be collected at the time of surgery from patients in each arm of the study. In addition to tissue stored in RNAlater and sent to a research laboratory, cultures will also be sent to Quest Diagnostics for independent culture results.
Other Names:
  • Ibis T5000 biosensor
  • Illumina MiSeq system

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Tissue Samples Identified With Bacterial DNA According to Highly Sensitive Bacterial Assays
Time Frame: Study surgery to 6-month clinical follow-up
The objective of this research is to see if highly sensitive bacterial assays are useful for determining whether fracture nonunions are infected
Study surgery to 6-month clinical follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Maryland, Baltimore

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 21, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 31, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 15, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 18, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 18, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 24, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 28, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 16, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HP-00066769

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Orthopaedic Trauma Infections

Clinical Trials on Highly Sensitive Assays

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings