Improvement of Immunologic and Molecular Techniques for the Diagnosis and Follow-up of Patients With Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura

Improvement of Immunologic and Molecular Techniques for the Diagnosis and Follow-up of Patients With Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura: a Collaborative Study Proposal of the Spanish Apheresis Group (GEA) in Collaboration With the Spanish Foundation of Hematology and Hemotherapy (FEHH)

The lack of ADAMTS13 is the only biological marker that is specific for aTTP diagnosis8 and the assessment of ADAMTS13 is of clinical importance because it is essential for the rapid differential diagnosis between aTTP and other TMA. Furthermore, monitoring of ADAMTS13 activity is useful to ensure biological remission (ADAMTS13 levels > 10%) as well as predicting relapses.

Due to the high mortality rate of aTTP, treatment should be started as soon as the disease is suspected, sometimes even before confirmation with the ADAMTS13 test results. This situation may lead to misdiagnose some patients and leave them without the appropriate treatment. In conclusion, ADAMTS13 activity assay is crucial for an early diagnosis and optimal management of acute aTTP and any delay in ADAMTS13 results will have a negative impact on the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of the patient.

There are currently 2 techniques available for the ADAMTS13 activity determination, the fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) and the Technozym chromogenic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Both are considered reference methods but they require considerable skill because they are highly manual and this increases the risk of error. Furthermore, these methods are time-consuming, not widely available and, in case of the ELISA method, it requires a new calibration at each run. The inter-laboratory variability is also a challenge and therefore a validation and/or interpretation method could be needed.

Recently, a new and first fully automated HemosIL AcuStar ADAMTS13 Activity assay (Instrumentation Laboratory, Bedford, Massachusetts, United States) has been developed. HemosIL AcuStar ADAMTS13 Activity assay is a two steps chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) with an analytical time of 33 minutes for the quantitative measurement of ADAMTS13 activity in human-citrated plasma on the ACL AcuStar analyser. The immunoassay uses the GST-VWF73 substrate in combination with magnetic particles for rapid separation and chemiluminescence technology detection. The ADAMTS13 present in the plasma sample cleavages the GST-VWF73 substrate and the detection of the generated fragments is based upon an isoluminol-labelled monoclonal antibody that specifically reacts with the cleaved peptide. The emitted light is proportional to the ADAMTS13 activity in the sample.

This new ADAMTS13 assay method has been compared with the other two available techniques in two different studies. First, Favresse et al. published the results of the comparison between Technozym activity ELISA assay and the new HemosIL AcuStar chemiluminescent assay. On the other hand, Valsecchi et al. have recently published the results of validation of this new technique in comparison with ELISA and FRETS in 176 samples. Both studies conclude that the new chemiluminescent ADAMTS13 activity assay showed a good correlation and excellent clinical performance for the diagnosis of severe ADAMTS13 deficiency with the FRETS-VWF73 assay and a commercial ELISA when considering only ADAMTS13 activity values below 10% (the internationally accepted cut-off for a diagnosis of severe ADAMTS13 deficiency typical of aTTP). Finally, Stratmann et al. have just published another study comparing the HemosIL AcuStar chemiluminescent assay with two commercially available ADAMTS13 assay kits using 24 paired test samples derived from 10 consecutively recruited patients13 and their results corroborate the previously published data suggesting that the AcuStar assay could be a valuable and accurate tool for ADAMTS13 activity testing and aTTP diagnostic.

In this context, a unique opportunity to validate this new technique is generated, both retrospectively with our already available data from frozen samples and also in the context of a large prospective study. This will be the first study worldwide testing HemosIL AcuStar method in real clinical practice aTTP population (Spanish and Portuguese aTTP populations) with the aim to standardize the diagnosis and follow-up methodology for the disease.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Coimbra, Portugal, 3004-561
        • Recruiting
        • Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra
        • Contact:
          • Teresa Fidalgo, MD
      • A Coruña, Spain, 15006
        • Recruiting
        • Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña
        • Contact:
          • Marta Fernandez Docampo, MD
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona
        • Contact:
          • Maribel Diaz Ricart
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Gregorio Marañon
        • Contact:
          • Cristina Pascual
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Clinico San Carlos
        • Contact:
          • Jorge Martinez
      • Valencia, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital La Fe de Valencia
        • Contact:
          • Ines Gomez Segui

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 second to 99 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population will be all consecutive patients who meet the following inclusion criteria and none of the following exclusion criteria until reaching the number of patients determined for the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with confirmed thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) based on citrated blood samples meeting both of the following criteria:

    • Thrombocytopenia [drop in platelet count ≥50% or platelet count < 100x109/L and
    • Microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia (elevation of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) >2- fold or by presence or increase of schistocytes in peripheral blood smear)
  • Patients that voluntarily sign informed consent. For subjects unable to provide consent, a fully recognized medical proxy may be used according to local laws.
  • Patients between 0 to 99 years old at the time of screening.

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation of a new diagnostic test and standard test
Time Frame: At diagnosis of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
Correlation of a new diagnostic test, HemosIL AcuStar chemiluminescent assay, in comparison with ELISA and/or FRETS in the measurement of activity and antibody of ADAMTS13 in IU/mL
At diagnosis of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
Correlation of a new diagnostic test and standard test
Time Frame: At follow up (10 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
Correlation of a new diagnostic test, HemosIL AcuStar chemiluminescent assay, in comparison with ELISA and/or FRETS in the measurement of activity and antibody of ADAMTS13 in IU/mL
At follow up (10 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
Correlation of a new diagnostic test and standard test
Time Frame: At follow up (30 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
Correlation of a new diagnostic test, HemosIL AcuStar chemiluminescent assay, in comparison with ELISA and/or FRETS in the measurement of activity and antibody of ADAMTS13 in IU/mL
At follow up (30 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
Correlation of a new diagnostic test and standard test
Time Frame: At follow up (60 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
Correlation of a new diagnostic test, HemosIL AcuStar chemiluminescent assay, in comparison with ELISA and/or FRETS in the measurement of activity and antibody of ADAMTS13 in IU/mL
At follow up (60 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
Correlation of a new diagnostic test and standard test
Time Frame: At follow up (90 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
Correlation of a new diagnostic test, HemosIL AcuStar chemiluminescent assay, in comparison with ELISA and/or FRETS in the measurement of activity and antibody of ADAMTS13 in IU/mL
At follow up (90 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
Correlation of a new diagnostic test and standard test
Time Frame: At follow up (180 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
Correlation of a new diagnostic test, HemosIL AcuStar chemiluminescent assay, in comparison with ELISA and/or FRETS in the measurement of activity and antibody of ADAMTS13 in IU/mL
At follow up (180 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
Correlation of a new diagnostic test and standard test
Time Frame: At follow up (365 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
Correlation of a new diagnostic test, HemosIL AcuStar chemiluminescent assay, in comparison with ELISA and/or FRETS in the measurement of activity and antibody of ADAMTS13 in IU/mL
At follow up (365 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Concordance of classification of aTTP
Time Frame: At diagnosis of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
To evaluate the concordance of classification of aTTP patients at diagnosis based on HemosIL AcuStar chemiluminescent assay, in comparison with ELISA and/or FRETS.
At diagnosis of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
Concordance of classification of aTTP
Time Frame: At follow up (10 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
To evaluate the concordance of classification of aTTP patients based on HemosIL AcuStar chemiluminescent assay, in comparison with ELISA and/or FRETS.
At follow up (10 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
Concordance of classification of aTTP
Time Frame: At follow up (30 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
To evaluate the concordance of classification of aTTP patients based on HemosIL AcuStar chemiluminescent assay, in comparison with ELISA and/or FRETS.
At follow up (30 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
Concordance of classification of aTTP
Time Frame: At follow up (60 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
To evaluate the concordance of classification of aTTP patients based on HemosIL AcuStar chemiluminescent assay, in comparison with ELISA and/or FRETS.
At follow up (60 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
Concordance of classification of aTTP
Time Frame: At follow up (90 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
To evaluate the concordance of classification of aTTP patients based on HemosIL AcuStar chemiluminescent assay, in comparison with ELISA and/or FRETS.
At follow up (90 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
Concordance of classification of aTTP
Time Frame: At follow up (180 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
To evaluate the concordance of classification of aTTP patients based on HemosIL AcuStar chemiluminescent assay, in comparison with ELISA and/or FRETS.
At follow up (180 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
Concordance of classification of aTTP
Time Frame: At follow up (365 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
To evaluate the concordance of classification of aTTP patients based on HemosIL AcuStar chemiluminescent assay, in comparison with ELISA and/or FRETS.
At follow up (365 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
Sensitivity and specificity of classification of aTTP
Time Frame: At diagnosis of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of classification of aTTP patients visits based on HemosIL AcuStar chemiluminescent assay, in comparison with ELISA and/or FRETS.
At diagnosis of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
Sensitivity and specificity of classification of aTTP
Time Frame: At follow up (10 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of classification of aTTP patients visits based on HemosIL AcuStar chemiluminescent assay, in comparison with ELISA and/or FRETS.
At follow up (10 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
Sensitivity and specificity of classification of aTTP
Time Frame: At follow up (30 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of classification of aTTP patients visits based on HemosIL AcuStar chemiluminescent assay, in comparison with ELISA and/or FRETS.
At follow up (30 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
Sensitivity and specificity of classification of aTTP
Time Frame: At follow up (60 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of classification of aTTP patients visits based on HemosIL AcuStar chemiluminescent assay, in comparison with ELISA and/or FRETS.
At follow up (60 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
Sensitivity and specificity of classification of aTTP
Time Frame: At follow up (90 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of classification of aTTP patients visits based on HemosIL AcuStar chemiluminescent assay, in comparison with ELISA and/or FRETS.
At follow up (90 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
Sensitivity and specificity of classification of aTTP
Time Frame: At follow up (180 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of classification of aTTP patients visits based on HemosIL AcuStar chemiluminescent assay, in comparison with ELISA and/or FRETS.
At follow up (180 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
Sensitivity and specificity of classification of aTTP
Time Frame: At follow up (365 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of classification of aTTP patients visits based on HemosIL AcuStar chemiluminescent assay, in comparison with ELISA and/or FRETS.
At follow up (365 days) of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
Clinical characteristics
Time Frame: At diagnosis of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
Describe clinical characteristics of patients with TMA at the diagnosis and those with aTTP at the diagnosis and follow up based on ADAMTS13 cut-off < 10%.
At diagnosis of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP).
Clinical characteristics
Time Frame: At follow up (10 days)
Describe clinical characteristics of patients with TMA at the diagnosis and those with aTTP at the diagnosis and follow up based on ADAMTS13 cut-off < 10%.
At follow up (10 days)
Clinical characteristics
Time Frame: At follow up (30 days)
Describe clinical characteristics of patients with TMA at the diagnosis and those with aTTP at the diagnosis and follow up based on ADAMTS13 cut-off < 10%.
At follow up (30 days)
Clinical characteristics
Time Frame: At follow up (60 days)
Describe clinical characteristics of patients with TMA at the diagnosis and those with aTTP at the diagnosis and follow up based on ADAMTS13 cut-off < 10%.
At follow up (60 days)
Clinical characteristics
Time Frame: At follow up (90 days)
Describe clinical characteristics of patients with TMA at the diagnosis and those with aTTP at the diagnosis and follow up based on ADAMTS13 cut-off < 10%.
At follow up (90 days)
Clinical characteristics
Time Frame: At follow up (180 days)
Describe clinical characteristics of patients with TMA at the diagnosis and those with aTTP at the diagnosis and follow up based on ADAMTS13 cut-off < 10%.
At follow up (180 days)
Clinical characteristics
Time Frame: At follow up (365 days)
Describe clinical characteristics of patients with TMA at the diagnosis and those with aTTP at the diagnosis and follow up based on ADAMTS13 cut-off < 10%.
At follow up (365 days)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 13, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

September 16, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 20, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acquired Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura

Clinical Trials on ADAMTS13 Activity Assays

3
Subscribe