Comparing the Effect of Focused and Radial Extracorporeal Shock Waves on Post-stroke Hypertonia

April 25, 2017 updated by: Gwo-Chi Hu,PHD, Mackay Memorial Hospital
The main purpose of this study is to compare treatment efficacy of focused and radial extracorporeal shock waves on spasticity in chronic stroke patient

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study is a prospective and double-blinded randomized control trial. Thirty-two stroke patients with spastic equinus were randomly assigned to receive three sessions of either focused shockwave therapy or radial shockwave therapy at 1-week intervals. The intensities that were used during FSWT (0.1 mJ/mm2) and RSWT (2 bar) were comparable. Patients were evaluated at baseline and at 1, 4, 8 weeks after the final shockwave treatment. The primary outcome measure was modified Ashworth scale (MAS) score. Secondary outcome measures were Tardieu scale, ankle passive range of motion, plantar contact area during gait, and gait speed. A linear mixed model with repeated measures was used to compare each outcome measure between the two groups.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
32

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Taiwan
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 104
        • Mackay Memorial Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged greater than 18 years old;
  • at least 6 months since onset of last stroke;
  • triceps surae muscle tone graded at least 1+ on the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score;
  • ability to walk alone with/without orthosis.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria included fixed ankle joint contracture, previous treatment of the affected leg with neurolytic or surgical procedures, concomitant progressive central nervous system diseases, and skin breakdown, vascular disease in the affected leg

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: focused shock wave
Treatment was administered directly to the middle of muscle bellies of the spastic triceps surae muscle in three sessions, with one week interval. During each session, 3000 pulses (1500 shots in the gastrocnemius and 1500 shots in the soleus muscle) were delivered at 5 Hz. The intensities of FSWT were 0.10 mJ/mm2.
Device: Focused shock wave
The outcome evaluation include ankle range of motion (ROM), modified Ashworth scale (MAS),modified Tardieu scale (MTS), baropodometric measurement, and gait speed.
Experimental: radial shock wave
Treatment was administered directly to the middle of muscle bellies of the spastic triceps surae muscle in three sessions, with one week interval. During each session, 3000 pulses (1500 shots in the gastrocnemius and 1500 shots in the soleus muscle) were delivered at 5 Hz.The intensities of RSWT were 2.0 bar.
Device: Radial shock wave
The outcome evaluation include ankle range of motion (ROM), modified Ashworth scale (MAS),modified Tardieu scale (MTS), baropodometric measurement, and gait speed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline of spasticity on 1st, 4th, 8th weeks after treatment.
Time Frame: 1, 4, 8 week
Using the modyfied Ashworth Scale to measure the spasticity before treatment and multiple time frame after treatment.
1, 4, 8 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline of range of motion on 1st, 4th, 8th weeks after treatment.
Time Frame: 1, 4, 8 week
Using the digital goniometer to measure the passive range of motion before treatment and multiple time frame after treatment.
1, 4, 8 week
Change from baseline of modified Tardieu scale on 1st, 4th, 8th weeks after treatment.
Time Frame: 1, 4, 8 week
Using the modified Tardieu scale (MTS) to measure the spasticity before treatment and multiple time frame after treatment.
1, 4, 8 week
Change from baseline of foot contact area on 1st, 4th, 8th weeks after treatment.
Time Frame: 1, 4, 8 week
Using the baropodometric measurement to measure the foot contact area before treatment and multiple time frame after treatment.
1, 4, 8 week
Change from baseline of gait speed on 8th weeks after treatment.
Time Frame: 8 week
Using the 10 meters walking test to measure the gait speed before treatment and after treatment.
8 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Mackay Memorial Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 20, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 25, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 26, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 26, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 25, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 15MMHIS194e

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spasticity

Clinical Trials on Focused shock wave

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings