Application of speCtraL Computed tomogrAphy to impRove specIficity of Cardiac compuTed tomographY (CLARITY)

October 15, 2018 updated by: Tim Leiner, UMC Utrecht

Diagnostic Accuracy of Spectral Computed Tomography for Detection of Flow Limiting Coronary Stenosis Using Fractional Flow Reserve as the Standard of Reference

Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and, if indicated, invasively measured fractional flow reserve (FFR) is currently used for ruling out significant coronary artery disease. FFRCT is a novel non-invasive technique in which FFR is derived from CT images, however this method is currently, just like CCTA, lacking specificity. Spectral Detector CT (SDCT) is a novel technique whereby a spectrum of monoenergetic images at different kiloelectron Volt (keV) values (40 to 200 keV) can be reconstructed. By using these monoenergetic images, a decrease in blooming and beam-hardening artifacts could be achieved. In addition, SDCT offers the opportunity to assess myocardial iodine distribution and quantification. When combining these factors, we hypothesize more accurate information will be available about the coronary anatomy, degree of stenosis and FFRCT and thereby contribute to a more accurate way for the detection of hemodynamic significant stenosis. Therefore, the aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of SDCT as a non-invasive way for the detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis.

Objective: The overall objective of this project is to assess the accuracy of SDCT for the detection of flow limiting stenosis in the coronary arteries using invasive FFR as the standard of reference. Whereby different sub-aims (e.g. improvement of FFRCT) are made to answer the overall objective. The secondary objective is to determine the decrease of calcium blooming of calcifications and beam-hardening artifacts and the improvement of myocardial blood volume quantification on SDCT in comparison with conventional CT.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
75

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Netherlands
      • Utrecht, Netherlands, 3508GA
        • Recruiting
        • University Medical Center UtrechtU
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Tim Leiner, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Robbert van Hamersvelt, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants ≥18 years of age with suspected or known stable angina with pre-test likelihood of 50-85% for obstructive coronary disease (Eur Heart J 2013 guidelines on stable CAD) and who are referred for clinical invasive FFR.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥18 years old;
  • Suspected or known stable angina with pre-test likelihood of 50-85% for obstructive coronary disease, using the method recommended by the European Society of Cardiology 2013 Guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease (Eur Heart J 2013);
  • Referred for invasive testing with fractional flow reserve;
  • Willing and able to give informed consent. The consent procedures, as set by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) will be followed.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with suspected or known stable angina with pre-test likelihood of 0-50% using the method recommended by the European Society of Cardiology 2013 Guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease (Eur Heart J 2013 [24]);
  • Subjects who because of age, general medical or psychiatric condition, or physiologic status cannot give valid informed consent or tolerate the coronary CTA examination;
  • Subjects with (severe) renal insufficiency, indicated as glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <60 ml/min;
  • Subjects with unknown GFR or obtained >3 months before the planned scan;
  • Contraindication or allergy to intravenous contrast agent(s);
  • Subjects who participate in an other study with radiation which is estimated to be in risk category III (ICRP 62);
  • Subjects who are pregnant;
  • Subjects with contraindications to cardiac CT and/or S&S protocol, intravenous contrast, intravenous adenosine, betablockers or nitroglycerine.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Flow limiting stenosis in the coronary arteries defined by invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR)
Time Frame: within 30 days
An invasive FFR <0.8 indicates a flow limiting stenosis
within 30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
UMC Utrecht

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Tim Leiner, MD, PhD, UMC Utrecht

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 29, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 29, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 1, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 2, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 3, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 17, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 15, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NL55917.041.16

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myocardial Ischemia

Clinical Trials on Dual-layer spectral detector CT

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings