Comparison of Different Doses of Dexmedetomidine Effect in the Duration of Spinal Anesthesia

May 7, 2017 updated by: Hassan Mohamed Ali, Cairo University
Small doses of dexmedetomidine1.5,3, 5µg used in combination with bupivacaine, in humans for spinal anesthesia has been shown to produce a more rapid onset of motor block, and a longer duration of motor and sensory block with preserved hemodynamic stability and lack of sedation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Spinal anesthesia has many advantages such as reducing the metabolic stress response to surgery, reduction in blood loss, decrease in the incidence of venous thromboembolism, reduction in pulmonary compromise (particularly in patients with advanced pulmonary disease),return of bowel function rapidly, allow hospital discharge early and the ability to monitor the patient's mental status, but the limited duration of action is one of its disadvantages. Intrathecal α2-agonists prolong the duration of action of local anesthetics and reduce the total required dose.(1, 2) Dexmedetomidine is a centrally acting highly specific α2 -agonist and its α2/α1 selectivity are 8 times higher than that of clonidine.(3) It is commonly used as a sedative, preemptive analgesic,(4) to decrease the incidence of postoperative nausea, vomiting (PONV)(5) and to maintain stable hemodynamics(6). It also has been used as an additive to local anesthetics in peripheral nerve blocks, brachial plexus block7, subarachnoid anesthesia and caudal anesthesia (8).

Local anesthetics have been widely used in medical practice to produce anesthesia, analgesia and for pain management. Nowadays, minor surgical operations have been done under local anesthesia outside the operating theaters, in this area monitoring and resuscitation facilities of the case are suboptimal compared to operating rooms. The complications of local anesthesia are different from localized reactions such as urticaria, edema, and dermatitis to systemic absorption leading to severe cardiovascular collapse and neurological toxicity. The incidence of local anesthetics to produce systemic toxicity decreased in the past 30 years, from 0.2 to 0.01 %.( 9) Recently, patient safety changes a clinician's perspective on understanding the pharmacology of drug interactions and complications of local anesthetics. The safety of local anesthetic usage has improved owing to the introduction of newer agents (eg; Ropivacaine and Levobupivacaine). (10) Levobupivacaine is a long-acting local anesthetic similar to that of Bupivacaine in a pharmacological structure. Bupivacaine, a widely used local anesthetic in regional anesthesia presents in a commercial preparation as a racemic mixture (50:50) of its two enantiomers, Levobupivacaine, S (-) isomer and destroy- bupivacaine, R (+) isomer.

Levobupivacaine has been shown to have a safer pharmacological profile (11) with less cardiac and neurotoxic adverse effects. (12) Small doses of dexmedetomidine 5µg used in combination with Levobupivacaine, in humans for spinal anesthesia has been shown to produce a more rapid onset of motor block, and a longer duration of motor and sensory block with preserved hemodynamic stability and lack of sedation2.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
    • Giza
      • Cairo, Giza, Egypt, 1234
        • Recruiting
        • Cairo University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients' physical status by the American Association of Anesthesiology (ASA): ASA I, II, III, undergoing Lower abdominal surgeries of maximum duration 2hrs

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients who refuse regional anesthesia or patient with bleeding tendency, taking α2- adrenergic agonist, labile hypertension, uncontrolled cardiac disease, heart block/dysrhythmia, difficulty in communication e.g. mental retardation or deafness, body weight more than 120kg or height less than 150cm, allergic to any of the drugs used in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: control group
intrathecal Dexmedetomidine received 3mL (15mg) of 0.5% levobupivacaine +0.5mL normal saline .
Drug: intrathecal Dexmedetomidine
injection of different doses of Dexmedetomidine intrathecally received 3mL (15mg) of 0.5% levobupivacaine +0.5mL normal saline.
Other Names:
  • saline intrathecally
Experimental: 1.5 DEX
Dexmedetomidine 1.5 micrograms received 3mL (15mg) of 0.5% levobupivacaine +0.5ml (1.5μg) dexmedetomidine
Drug: Dexmedetomidine 1.5 micrograms
injection of different doses of Dexmedetomidine intrathecally in the form of 3mL (15mg) of 0.5% levobupivacaine +0.5mLof 1.5 micrograms of Dexmedetomidine.
Other Names:
  • Dexmedetomidine 1.5 micrograms intrathecally
Experimental: 3 DEX
Dexmedetomidine 3 micrograms received 3mL (15mg) of 0.5% levobupivacaine +0.5ml (3μg) dexmedetomidine
Drug: Dexmedetomidine 3 micrograms
injection of different doses of Dexmedetomidine intrathecally in the form of 3mL (15mg) of 0.5% levobupivacaine +0.5mLof 3 micrograms of Dexmedetomidine.
Other Names:
  • Dexmedetomidine 3 micrograms intrathecally
Experimental: 5 DEX
Dexmedetomidine 5 micrograms received 3mL (15mg) of 0.5% levobupivacaine +0.5ml (5μg) dexmedetomidine
Drug: Dexmedetomidine 5 micrograms
injection of different doses of Dexmedetomidine intrathecally in the form of 3mL (15mg) of 0.5% levobupivacaine +0.5mLof 5 micrograms of Dexmedetomidine.
Other Names:
  • Dexmedetomidine 5 micrograms intrathecally

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
duration of sensory block
Time Frame: 6 hours
time from onset of spinal to full recovery
6 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Cairo University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 7, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 30, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 4, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 4, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 8, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 9, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 7, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Dexmedetomidine12

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Anesthesia Duration

Clinical Trials on intrathecal Dexmedetomidine

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings