Strategies for Patients With Osteoarthritis, by Using Assistive Technology and Exercises.
Comparison Between Care Strategies for Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Hands Based on the Use of Joint Protection, Assistive Technology and Exercises.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Participants
Were included 200 patients in the group of Bone Metabolic Diseases of the Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of São Paulo (FMUSP). Were included patients aged between 40 and 80 years, with involvement of osteoarthritis (OA) in the knees and of these, a sample of patients with involvement of the first carpometacarpal, metacarpophalangeal or interphalangeal joint of the thumb and the proximal or distal interphalangeal joint of fingers with from I to III degrees of classification of Kelgreen and Lawrence (KL).
For the calculation of the sample size, a pilot test was performed with 15 subjects and assumed: alpha of 5%, beta of 20% (power = 80%) and difference between the groups of 10% referring to the scores at each scale . With these data, a minimum of 200 individuals was calculated.
Intervention
Participants are patients in an OA treatment program in the Bone Metabolic Diseases group of the Orthopedics and Traumatology Institute of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of São Paulo (FMUSP).
These patients were evaluated for their ability to perform functional activities and anthropometric parameters of upper limbs. The Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), questionnaires were applied, as well as grip strength measured with Jamar® dynamometer, key pinch, three point pinch, and a pulp pinch measured with B & L Pinch-gauge® dynamometer.
The force was established after arithmetic average of 3 trials. The tests were performed bilaterally. The presence of deformities has also been reported.
The total sample was divided into two groups. Both received guidelines on joint protection and energy conservation, including theoretical and practical classes aimed at protecting all joints that may be affected by OA.
Theoretical classes were carried out through slide presentation with concepts of joint protection, conservation of energy, organization of time, organization of the home and work environment and organization of daily routine. Printed information material was also provided.
The practical classes were carried out in a simulated house, mounted in two rooms of infirmary, suggesting all the environments of a conventional house. Adaptations made by therapists and commercials and conventional objects used in daily living activities were used for the guidelines described above.
The groups were divided between 1 and 2, which was group 1 with patients who presented osteoarthritis in the knees, without specific complaints of hand, but with radiographic findings and group 2 was characterized by patients with radiographic signs and symptoms of hands that presented larger functional limitations in the daily routine or that were eligible for rehabilitation treatment using orthosis models such as resting hand volar splints, thumb stabilization splints or finger volar splints with nocturnal support, aiming at the relief of the pain, stabilization of the affected joints and the prevention of the appearance/aggravation of deformities. Exercise guidelines for maintenance of muscle strength for thumb and fingers were performed in patients who presented significant improvement of pain.
Patients returned for reevaluation at 12 and 24 months after the initial evaluation.
Study Design
Prospective, analytical, experimental, case control study with mixed data collection (prospective and retrospective).
Statistical Analysis
The following variables were considered as dependent variables: HAQ, DASH (general questions, symptons and functions in athletes, performing artists and workers) and dynamometry (manual grip, key pinch, three point pinch and pulp pinch strenght) for the right and left hands. The dependent variables were submitted to ANOVA with factor 2 (Intervention: ortesis, exercises and orientation; orientation) by 8 (group of orientation: 8 different groups of orientation) by 3 (Moment of evaluation: 1- first evaluation [initial], 2- second evaluation [after 1 year], 3- third evaluation [after 2 years]) with repeated measures in the last factor. In order to compare the pain scores in the evaluation moments, the Friedman test was used for the three questions of the DASH's pain module, in a separated moment. Post-hoc comparisons were carried out using Tukey-HSD test (p<0.05).
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Sao Paulo, Brazil, 03828-000
- Escola de Artes,Ciencias e Humanidades da Universidade d Sao Paulo
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Kellgreen and Lawrence (KL) classification for I to III or painful IV osteoarthritis (with the use of orthoses for analgesia, in this case).
- Capacity to understand and agree to the consent form and questionnaires and evaluations.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who had undergone previous non-medical therapeutic treatment for OA of the hands;
- Who had undergone some surgical procedure in the region or were involved in another clinical trial;
- Patients with rheumatoid arthritis or other rheumatologic disease, any neurological problems.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Orthosis Exercises Orientation
Patients used orthosis, made exercises and received orientation for home.
|
Use of orthosis, exercises and orientation for home.
|
|
Active Comparator: Orientation
Patients received orientation for home.
|
Orientation for home.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patients with orthosis, exercises and orientation will show better results in the evaluation scales regarding strength compared to the group with only orientation.
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Strength will be measured dynamometer and compared between groups.
|
2 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patients with orthosis, exercises and orientation will show better results in the evaluation scales regarding functionality compared to the group with only orientation.
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Functionality will be measured by scales and compared between groups.
|
2 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Carlos BM Monteiro, Ph.D., University of Sao Paulo
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 60884416.3.0000.0068
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis Hand
-
NCT07217405RecruitingOsteoarthritis Wrist | Osteoarthritis Hand
-
NCT07371572Recruiting
-
NCT07501507Not yet recruitingErosive Hand Osteoarthritis
-
NCT04527588WithdrawnHand Osteoarthritis | Wrist Injuries | Wrist Fracture | Hand Injury Wrist | Wrist Arthritis | Hand Fracture | Hand Sprain
-
NCT07112742Enrolling by invitationHand Osteoarthritis | Thumb Osteoarthritis
-
NCT04928170Active, not recruitingOsteoarthritis, Knee | Osteoarthritis Hand | Osteoarthritis Generalized
-
NCT06281184Enrolling by invitationHand Osteoarthritis | Erosive Osteoarthritis
-
NCT04579848Active, not recruitingHand Osteoarthritis | Erosive Osteoarthritis
-
NCT04601883CompletedOsteoarthritis Hand | Osteoarthritis Finger
-
NCT05041231CompletedOsteoarthritis | Osteoarthritis Hand | Osteoarthritis Finger | Osteoarthritis Both Hands
Clinical Trials on Orthosis Exercises Orientation
-
NCT03528499CompletedShoulder Pain | Musculoskeletal Disease | Joint Disease | Shoulder Injury
-
NCT06515665Not yet recruiting
-
NCT04314973Enrolling by invitationParkinson Disease
-
NCT04777526Completed
-
NCT02937480Completed
-
NCT03821298Unknown
-
NCT07036120Recruiting
-
NCT03097081RecruitingTraumatic Fracture | Spine Fracture | Orthosis | Posterior Fixation
-
NCT00715650CompletedVeterans' Disability Claims