The Halland Osteoarthritis Cohort (HALLOA)

June 9, 2021 updated by: FoU Center Spenshult

The Halland Osteoarthritis (HALLOA) Cohort Study - a Five-year Observational Longitudinal Study With Focus on Metabolic Osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis is the most common musculoskeletal disease and is characterized by cartilage destruction, osteophyte formation, subchondral bone sclerosis and cysts. Modern treatment strategies, as well as preventive measures, include early detection and knowledge of the early course of the disease. This includes how stress patterns, physical activity, impaired function and metabolic changes and other comorbidities affect development and possible associations with osteoarthritis.

The overall objective was to study the early development of osteoarthritis of the knee and its association with hand- and general osteoarthritis, metabolic diseases, biomarkers, long-term pain, physical function and stress patterns

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Detailed Description

The overall objective was to study the early development of osteoarthritis of the knee and its association with hand- and general osteoarthritis, metabolic diseases, biomarkers, long-term pain, physical function and stress patterns.

The project includes 4 different research areas that are studied with the help of several smaller sub-studies:

Research area 1: Metabolic osteoarthritis - to study the connections between metabolic factors and osteoarthritis development in the knee and hand.

A. Relationship between knee osteoarthritis and metabolic factors B. Relationship between osteoarthritis of the hand and metabolic factors Research area 2: Biomarkers in knee and hand osteoarthritis - to study cartilage and bone markers that reflect different processes in osteoarthritis development, e.g. inflammation, matrix degradation both in the short and long term Research area 3: Pain and osteoarthritis - to study pain development and pain pressure thresholds in relation to lifestyle, depression and health-related quality of life in individuals with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis Research area 4: Physical function and osteoarthritis - to study physical function, physical activity and measured stress patterns, as well as changes in stress patterns and the relationship between these and the development of osteoarthritis over time.

Study design This is a longitudinal cohort study including 306 individuals with knee pain in the southwest of Sweden, the Halland osteoarthritis (HALLOA) cohort. The enrolments took place from 2017-2019. The participants were recruited: 1) by primary health care clinics when searching care for knee pain, or 2) by advertisements in local newspapers. The inclusion criterions were current knee pain, aged 30-65 years, with no former known radiographic knee osteoarthritis (RKOA). the exclusion criterions were no cruciate ligament rupture or rheumatologic disorder. A general practitioner examined all participants to confirm the exclusion criteria.

The cohort will be followed for five years with yearly follow-ups.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

312

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Halmstad, Sweden, SE-30274
        • Spenshult Research and Development center (FoU Spenshult)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

306 individuals with knee pain without cruciate ligament injury, age between 30 and 65 years

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Knee pain

Exclusion Criteria:

Cruciate ligament injury and rheumatic disease (RA, PsoA, As, Sponylarthritis etc)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
HALLOA
306 individuals with knee pain in the age between 30 and 65 years, without cruciate ligament injury

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
BMI (kg/m2)
Time Frame: At baseline
weight (kg) and height (m) are meassured and BMI will be calculated
At baseline
BMI (kg/m2)
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
weight (kg) and height (m) are meassured and BMI will be calculated
At 2 years follow-up
BMI (kg/m2)
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
weight (kg) and height (m) are meassured and BMI will be calculated
At 5 years follow-up
Abdominal circumference (cm)
Time Frame: At baseline
Abdominal circumference are meassured with measuring tape at navel height
At baseline
Abdominal circumference (cm)
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
Abdominal circumference are meassured with measuring tape at navel height
At 2 years follow-up
Abdominal circumference (cm)
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
Abdominal circumference are meassured with measuring tape at navel height
At 5 years follow-up
Body composition
Time Frame: At baseline
Body composition are assessed by Inbody 770, which gives data on proportion of muscle and body fat (separate meassures on visceral fat
At baseline
Body composition
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
Body composition are assessed by Inbody 770, which gives data on proportion of muscle and body fat (separate meassures on visceral fat
At 2 years follow-up
Body composition
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
Body composition are assessed by Inbody 770, which gives data on proportion of muscle and body fat (separate meassures on visceral fat
At 5 years follow-up
Glucos
Time Frame: At Baseline
Fasting glucos (mmol/L) meassured in serum
At Baseline
Glucos
Time Frame: At 1 year follow-up
Fasting glucos (mmol/L) meassured in serum
At 1 year follow-up
Glucos
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
Fasting glucos (mmol/L) meassured in serum
At 2 years follow-up
Glucos
Time Frame: At 3 years follow-up
Fasting glucos (mmol/L) meassured in serum
At 3 years follow-up
Glucos
Time Frame: At 4 years follow-up
Fasting glucos (mmol/L) meassured in serum
At 4 years follow-up
Glucos
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
Fasting glucos (mmol/L) meassured in serum
At 5 years follow-up
HbA1c
Time Frame: At baseline
HbA1c (mmol/mol) meassured in serum
At baseline
HbA1c
Time Frame: At 1 year follow-up
HbA1c (mmol/mol) meassured in serum
At 1 year follow-up
HbA1c
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
HbA1c (mmol/mol) meassured in serum
At 2 years follow-up
HbA1c
Time Frame: At 3 years follow-up
HbA1c (mmol/mol) meassured in serum
At 3 years follow-up
HbA1c
Time Frame: At 4 years follow-up
HbA1c (mmol/mol) meassured in serum
At 4 years follow-up
HbA1c
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
HbA1c (mmol/mol) meassured in serum
At 5 years follow-up
Total-cholesterol
Time Frame: At baseline
Total-cholesterol (mmol/L) meassured in serum
At baseline
Total-cholesterol
Time Frame: At 1 year follow-up
Total-cholesterol (mmol/L) meassured in serum
At 1 year follow-up
Total-cholesterol
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
Total-cholesterol (mmol/L) meassured in serum
At 2 years follow-up
Total-cholesterol
Time Frame: At 3 years follow-up
Total-cholesterol (mmol/L) meassured in serum
At 3 years follow-up
Total-cholesterol
Time Frame: At 4 years follow-up
Total-cholesterol (mmol/L) meassured in serum
At 4 years follow-up
Total-cholesterol
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
Total-cholesterol (mmol/L) meassured in serum
At 5 years follow-up
Triglycerides
Time Frame: At baseline
Triglycerides (mmol/L) meassured in serum
At baseline
Triglycerides
Time Frame: At 1 year follow-up
Triglycerides (mmol/L) meassured in serum
At 1 year follow-up
Triglycerides
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
Triglycerides (mmol/L) meassured in serum
At 2 years follow-up
Triglycerides
Time Frame: At 3 years follow-up
Triglycerides (mmol/L) meassured in serum
At 3 years follow-up
Triglycerides
Time Frame: At 4 years follow-up
Triglycerides (mmol/L) meassured in serum
At 4 years follow-up
Triglycerides
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
Triglycerides (mmol/L) meassured in serum
At 5 years follow-up
LDL-cholesterol
Time Frame: At baseline
LDL-cholesterol (mmol/L) meassured in serum
At baseline
LDL-cholesterol
Time Frame: At 1 year follow-up
LDL-cholesterol (mmol/L) meassured in serum
At 1 year follow-up
LDL-cholesterol
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
LDL-cholesterol (mmol/L) meassured in serum
At 2 years follow-up
LDL-cholesterol
Time Frame: At 3 years follow-up
LDL-cholesterol (mmol/L) meassured in serum
At 3 years follow-up
LDL-cholesterol
Time Frame: At 4 years follow-up
LDL-cholesterol (mmol/L) meassured in serum
At 4 years follow-up
LDL-cholesterol
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
LDL-cholesterol (mmol/L) meassured in serum
At 5 years follow-up
HDL-cholesterol
Time Frame: At baseline
HDL-cholesterol (mmol/L) meassured in serum
At baseline
HDL-cholesterol
Time Frame: At 1 year follow-up
HDL-cholesterol (mmol/L) meassured in serum
At 1 year follow-up
HDL-cholesterol
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
HDL-cholesterol (mmol/L) meassured in serum
At 2 years follow-up
HDL-cholesterol
Time Frame: At 3 years follow-up
HDL-cholesterol (mmol/L) meassured in serum
At 3 years follow-up
HDL-cholesterol
Time Frame: At 4 years follow-up
HDL-cholesterol (mmol/L) meassured in serum
At 4 years follow-up
HDL-cholesterol
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
HDL-cholesterol (mmol/L) meassured in serum
At 5 years follow-up
Sensitive C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Time Frame: At baseline
sensitive CRP (g/L) meassured in serum
At baseline
Sensitive C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Time Frame: At 1 year follow-up
sensitive CRP (g/L) meassured in serum
At 1 year follow-up
Sensitive C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
sensitive CRP (g/L) meassured in serum
At 2 years follow-up
Sensitive C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Time Frame: At 3 years follow-up
sensitive CRP (g/L) meassured in serum
At 3 years follow-up
Sensitive C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Time Frame: At 4 years follow-up
sensitive CRP (g/L) meassured in serum
At 4 years follow-up
Sensitive C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
sensitive CRP (g/L) meassured in serum
At 5 years follow-up
Interleukin-1 (IL-1)
Time Frame: At baseline
IL-1 (pg/mL) meassured in plasma with ELISA
At baseline
Interleukin-1 (IL-1)
Time Frame: At 1 year follow-up
IL-1 (pg/mL) meassured in plasma with ELISA
At 1 year follow-up
Interleukin-1 (IL-1)
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
IL-1 (pg/mL) meassured in plasma with ELISA
At 2 years follow-up
Interleukin-1 (IL-1)
Time Frame: At 3 years follow-up
IL-1 (pg/mL) meassured in plasma with ELISA
At 3 years follow-up
Interleukin-1 (IL-1)
Time Frame: At 4 years follow-up
IL-1 (pg/mL) meassured in plasma with ELISA
At 4 years follow-up
Interleukin-1 (IL-1)
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
IL-1 (pg/mL) meassured in plasma with ELISA
At 5 years follow-up
Interleukin-6 (IL-6)
Time Frame: At baseline
IL-6 (pg/mL) meassured in plasma with ELISA
At baseline
Interleukin-6 (IL-6)
Time Frame: At 1 year follow-up
IL-6 (pg/mL) meassured in plasma with ELISA
At 1 year follow-up
Interleukin-6 (IL-6)
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
IL-6 (pg/mL) meassured in plasma with ELISA
At 2 years follow-up
Interleukin-6 (IL-6)
Time Frame: At 3 years follow-up
IL-6 (pg/mL) meassured in plasma with ELISA
At 3 years follow-up
Interleukin-6 (IL-6)
Time Frame: At 4 years follow-up
IL-6 (pg/mL) meassured in plasma with ELISA
At 4 years follow-up
Interleukin-6 (IL-6)
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
IL-6 (pg/mL) meassured in plasma with ELISA
At 5 years follow-up
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alfa (TNF-alfa)
Time Frame: At baseline
TNF-alfa (pg/mL) meassured in plasma with ELISA
At baseline
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alfa (TNF-alfa)
Time Frame: At 1 year follow-up
TNF-alfa (pg/mL) meassured in plasma with ELISA
At 1 year follow-up
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alfa (TNF-alfa)
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
TNF-alfa (pg/mL) meassured in plasma with ELISA
At 2 years follow-up
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alfa (TNF-alfa)
Time Frame: At 3 years folllow-up
TNF-alfa (pg/mL) meassured in plasma with ELISA
At 3 years folllow-up
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alfa (TNF-alfa)
Time Frame: At 4 years follow-up
TNF-alfa (pg/mL) meassured in plasma with ELISA
At 4 years follow-up
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alfa (TNF-alfa)
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
TNF-alfa (pg/mL) meassured in plasma with ELISA
At 5 years follow-up
Leptin
Time Frame: At baseline
Leptin (ng/mL) meassured in serum with ELISA
At baseline
Leptin
Time Frame: At 1 year follow-up
Leptin (ng/mL) meassured in serum with ELISA
At 1 year follow-up
Leptin
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
Leptin (ng/mL) meassured in serum with ELISA
At 2 years follow-up
Leptin
Time Frame: At 3 years follow-up
Leptin (ng/mL) meassured in serum with ELISA
At 3 years follow-up
Leptin
Time Frame: At 4 years follow-up
Leptin (ng/mL) meassured in serum with ELISA
At 4 years follow-up
Leptin
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
Leptin (ng/mL) meassured in serum with ELISA
At 5 years follow-up
Galectin-1
Time Frame: At baseline
Galectin-1 (ng/mL) meassured in plasma with ELISA
At baseline
Galectin-1
Time Frame: At 1 year follow-up
Galectin-1 (ng/mL) meassured in plasma with ELISA
At 1 year follow-up
Galectin-1
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
Galectin-1 (ng/mL) meassured in plasma with ELISA
At 2 years follow-up
Galectin-1
Time Frame: At 3 years follow-up
Galectin-1 (ng/mL) meassured in plasma with ELISA
At 3 years follow-up
Galectin-1
Time Frame: At 4 years follow-up
Galectin-1 (ng/mL) meassured in plasma with ELISA
At 4 years follow-up
Galectin-1
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
Galectin-1 (ng/mL) meassured in plasma with ELISA
At 5 years follow-up
One-leg rise
Time Frame: At baseline
Knee strenght are assessed by one-leg rise
At baseline
One-leg rise
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
Knee strenght are assessed by one-leg rise
At 2 years follow-up
One-leg rise
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
Knee strenght are assessed by one-leg rise
At 5 years follow-up
30s-chair stand test
Time Frame: At baseline
Knee strenght are assessed by 30s-chair stand test
At baseline
30s-chair stand test
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
Knee strenght are assessed by 30s-chair stand test
At 2 years follow-up
30s-chair stand test
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
Knee strenght are assessed by 30s-chair stand test
At 5 years follow-up
Maximal voluntary isometric contraction of Quadriceps
Time Frame: At baseline
Maximal voluntary isometric contraction of Quadriceps assessed by dynamometer (N)
At baseline
Maximal voluntary isometric contraction of Quadriceps
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
Maximal voluntary isometric contraction of Quadriceps assessed by dynamometer (N)
At 2 years follow-up
Maximal voluntary isometric contraction of Quadriceps
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
Maximal voluntary isometric contraction of Quadriceps assessed by dynamometer (N)
At 5 years follow-up
Hand strenght
Time Frame: At baseline
Hand strenght are assessed by grippit (N)
At baseline
Hand strenght
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
Hand strenght are assessed by grippit (N)
At 2 years follow-up
Hand strenght
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
Hand strenght are assessed by grippit (N)
At 5 years follow-up
Fitness
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
Fitness are assessed by Åstrands test
At 2 years follow-up
Fitness
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
Fitness are assessed by Åstrands test
At 5 years follow-up
Pain thresholds
Time Frame: At baseline
pain threshold are assesed by computerized pressure algometry on eight predefined tender points out of the 18 points as part of the definition of fibromyalgia
At baseline
Pain thresholds
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
pain threshold are assesed by computerized pressure algometry on eight predefined tender points out of the 18 points as part of the definition of fibromyalgia
At 2 years follow-up
Pain thresholds
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
pain threshold are assesed by computerized pressure algometry on eight predefined tender points out of the 18 points as part of the definition of fibromyalgia
At 5 years follow-up
Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS)
Time Frame: At baseline
KOOS consists of 5 subscales, assessing self reported knee pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee related Quality of life (QOL).
At baseline
Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS)
Time Frame: At 1 year follow-up
KOOS consists of 5 subscales, assessing knee pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee related Quality of life (QOL).
At 1 year follow-up
Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS)
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
KOOS consists of 5 subscales, assessing knee pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee related Quality of life (QOL).
At 2 years follow-up
Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS)
Time Frame: At 3 years follow-up
KOOS consists of 5 subscales, assessing knee pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee related Quality of life (QOL).
At 3 years follow-up
Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS)
Time Frame: At 4 years follow-up
KOOS consists of 5 subscales, assessing knee pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee related Quality of life (QOL).
At 4 years follow-up
Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS)
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
KOOS consists of 5 subscales, assessing knee pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee related Quality of life (QOL).
At 5 years follow-up
Pain mannequin
Time Frame: At baseline
Patient reported pain distribution
At baseline
Pain mannequin
Time Frame: At 1 year follow-up
Patient reported pain distribution
At 1 year follow-up
Pain mannequin
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
Patient reported pain distribution
At 2 years follow-up
Pain mannequin
Time Frame: At 3 years follow-up
Patient reported pain distribution
At 3 years follow-up
Pain mannequin
Time Frame: At 4 years follow-up
Patient reported pain distribution
At 4 years follow-up
Pain mannequin
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
Patient reported pain distribution
At 5 years follow-up
Pain intensity
Time Frame: At baseline
Patient reported pain intensity by NRS scale 0-10 (best to worst)
At baseline
Pain intensity
Time Frame: At 1 year follow-up
Patient reported pain intensity by NRS scale 0-10 (best to worst)
At 1 year follow-up
Pain intensity
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
Patient reported pain intensity by NRS scale 0-10 (best to worst)
At 2 years follow-up
Pain intensity
Time Frame: At 3 years follow-up
Patient reported pain intensity by NRS scale 0-10 (best to worst)
At 3 years follow-up
Pain intensity
Time Frame: At 4 years follow-up
Patient reported pain intensity by NRS scale 0-10 (best to worst)
At 4 years follow-up
Patient intensity
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
Patient reported pain intensity by NRS scale 0-10 (best to worst)
At 5 years follow-up
Radiographic assessment of the knees
Time Frame: At baseline
radiographic assessment of tibiofemoral- and patellofemoral joint in the knee
At baseline
Radiographic assessment of the knees
Time Frame: At 1 year follow-up
radiographic assessment of tibiofemoral- and patellofemoral joint in the knee
At 1 year follow-up
Radiographic assessment of the knees
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
radiographic assessment of tibiofemoral- and patellofemoral joint in the knee
At 2 years follow-up
Radiographic assessment of the knees
Time Frame: At 3 years follow-up
radiographic assessment of tibiofemoral- and patellofemoral joint in the knee
At 3 years follow-up
Radiographic assessment of the knees
Time Frame: At 4 years follow-up
radiographic assessment of tibiofemoral- and patellofemoral joint in the knee
At 4 years follow-up
Radiographic assessment of the knees
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
radiographic assessment of tibiofemoral- and patellofemoral joint in the knee
At 5 years follow-up
Radiographic assessment of the hands
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
Radiographic assessment of the hands.
At 2 years follow-up
Radiographic assessment of the hands
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
Radiographic assessment of the hands.
At 5 years follow-up
Mechanical load
Time Frame: At inclusion
Movement behavior measured with a triaxle accelerometer at work and leisure over 7 days
At inclusion
Mechanical load
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
Movement behavior measured with a triaxle accelerometer at work and leisure over 7 days
At 2 years follow-up
Mechanical load
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
Movement behavior measured with a triaxle accelerometer at work and leisure over 7 days
At 5 years follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Blood samples for biobanking
Time Frame: At baseline
serum and plasma for biobanking in -70 degrees celcius
At baseline
Blood samples for biobanking
Time Frame: At 1 year follow-up
serum and plasma for biobanking in -70 degrees celcius
At 1 year follow-up
Blood samples for biobanking
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
serum and plasma for biobanking in -70 degrees celcius
At 2 years follow-up
Blood samples for biobanking
Time Frame: At 3 years follow-up
serum and plasma for biobanking in -70 degrees celcius
At 3 years follow-up
Blood samples for biobanking
Time Frame: At 4 years follow-up
serum and plasma for biobanking in -70 degrees celcius
At 4 years follow-up
Blood samples for biobanking
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
serum and plasma for biobanking in -70 degrees celcius
At 5 years follow-up
Patient reported physical activity
Time Frame: At baseline
Patient reported physical activity with questions duration and intensity according to WHO recommendations
At baseline
Patient reported physical activity
Time Frame: At 1 year follow-up
Patient reported physical activity with questions duration and intensity according to WHO recommendations
At 1 year follow-up
Patient reported physical activity
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
Patient reported physical activity with questions duration and intensity according to WHO recommendations
At 2 years follow-up
Patient reported physical activity
Time Frame: At 3 years follow-up
Patient reported physical activity with questions duration and intensity according to WHO recommendations
At 3 years follow-up
Patient reported physical activity
Time Frame: At 4 years follow-up
Patient reported physical activity with questions duration and intensity according to WHO recommendations
At 4 years follow-up
Patient reported physical activity
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
Patient reported physical activity with questions duration and intensity according to WHO recommendations
At 5 years follow-up
Patient reported smoking and snuff habits
Time Frame: At baseline
Patient reported smoking habits, year for smoke or snuff cessation, number of cigarettes or amount of snuff
At baseline
Patient reported smoking and snuff habits
Time Frame: At 1 years follow-up
Patient reported smoking habits, year for smoke or snuff cessation, number of cigarettes or amount of snuff
At 1 years follow-up
Patient reported smoking and snuff habits
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
Patient reported smoking habits, year for smoke or snuff cessation, number of cigarettes or amount of snuff
At 2 years follow-up
Patient reported smoking and snuff habits
Time Frame: At 3 years follow-up
Patient reported smoking habits, year for smoke or snuff cessation, number of cigarettes or amount of snuff
At 3 years follow-up
Patient reported smoking and snuff habits
Time Frame: At 4 years follow-up
Patient reported smoking habits, year for smoke or snuff cessation, number of cigarettes or amount of snuff
At 4 years follow-up
Patient reported smoking and snuff habits
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
Patient reported smoking habits, year for smoke or snuff cessation, number of cigarettes or amount of snuff
At 5 years follow-up
Patient reported diets
Time Frame: At baseline
Patient reported diets and intake of fruits and sweets
At baseline
Patient reported diets
Time Frame: At 1 year follow-up
Patient reported diets and intake of fruits and sweets
At 1 year follow-up
Patient reported diets
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
Patient reported diets and intake of fruits and sweets
At 2 years follow-up
Patient reported diets
Time Frame: At 3 years follow-up
Patient reported diets and intake of fruits and sweets
At 3 years follow-up
Patient reported diets
Time Frame: At 4 years follow-up
Patient reported diets and intake of fruits and sweets
At 4 years follow-up
Patient reported diets
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
Patient reported diets and intake of fruits and sweets
At 5 years follow-up
Patient reported alcohol habits
Time Frame: At baseline
Patient reported alcohol habis assessed by AUDIT C
At baseline
Patient reported alcohol habits
Time Frame: At 1 year follow-up
Patient reported alcohol habis assessed by AUDIT C
At 1 year follow-up
Patient reported alcohol habits
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
Patient reported alcohol habis assessed by AUDIT C
At 2 years follow-up
Patient reported alcohol habits
Time Frame: At 3 years follow-up
Patient reported alcohol habis assessed by AUDIT C
At 3 years follow-up
Patient reported alcohol habits
Time Frame: At 4 years follow-up
Patient reported alcohol habis assessed by AUDIT C
At 4 years follow-up
Patient reported alcohol habits
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
Patient reported alcohol habis assessed by AUDIT C
At 5 years follow-up
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: At baseline
HADS is a simple self-assessment form that shows a measure of the patient's mood.
At baseline
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: At 1 year follow-up
HADS is a simple self-assessment form that shows a measure of the patient's mood.
At 1 year follow-up
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
HADS is a simple self-assessment form that shows a measure of the patient's mood.
At 2 years follow-up
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: At 3 years follow-up
HADS is a simple self-assessment form that shows a measure of the patient's mood.
At 3 years follow-up
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: At 4 years follow-up
HADS is a simple self-assessment form that shows a measure of the patient's mood.
At 4 years follow-up
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
HADS is a simple self-assessment form that shows a measure of the patient's mood.
At 5 years follow-up
Health literacy
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
Health literacy assessed with the Swedish Functional Health Literacy scale
At 2 years follow-up
Health literacy
Time Frame: At 3 years follow-up
Health literacy assessed with the Swedish Functional Health Literacy scale
At 3 years follow-up
Health literacy
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
Health literacy assessed with the Swedish Functional Health Literacy scale
At 5 years follow-up
Clinical examination of the knees
Time Frame: At baseline
Clinical examination to assessing clinical knee OA
At baseline
Clinical examination of the knees
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
Clinical examination to assessing clinical knee OA
At 2 years follow-up
Clinical examination of the knees
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
Clinical examination to assessing clinical knee OA
At 5 years follow-up
Clinical examination of the hands
Time Frame: At baseline
Clinical examination of the hands assessing clinical hand OA
At baseline
Clinical examination of the hands
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
Clinical examination of the hands assessing clinical hand OA
At 2 years follow-up
Clinical examination of the hands
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
Clinical examination of the hands assessing clinical hand OA
At 5 years follow-up
Blood pressure
Time Frame: At baseline
Blood pressure assessed in sitting position after rest, mmHg
At baseline
Blood pressure
Time Frame: At 2 years follow-up
Blood pressure assessed in sitting position after rest, mmHg
At 2 years follow-up
Blood pressure
Time Frame: At 5 years follow-up
Blood pressure assessed in sitting position after rest, mmHg
At 5 years follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maria LE Andersson, ass.prof., FoU Spenshult

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 2, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 16, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 16, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HALLOA

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis, Knee

3
Subscribe