V-Y Flap Versus Occlusive Dressing in Treating Fingertip Injuries With Exposed Bone

May 10, 2020 updated by: Mohammed Abdelnasser Abdelfatah Farghay, Assiut University
Fingertip is a complex structure that is responsible for the fine function of the fingers and the whole hand. A fingertip injury is any soft tissue, nail or bony injury distal to the insertions of the long flexor and extensor tendons of a finger .Fingertip injury is a serious condition that if untreated properly could lead to significant functional disability and disuse of the injured finger. Up to date, defining the best treatment option for this injury remains controversial. Hand surgeons are divided between proponents of flap coverage and conservative treatment, driven by beliefs, training programs and financial aspects. After recently reviewing the literature for the current best evidence and fundamentals of conservative treatment, Krauss and Lalandei in their recent review of the literature, pointed out to the necessity for implementing controlled trials to compare both ways of treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and the results of occlusive dressing in treating fingertip injuries in comparison to flaps with much concern to certain factors that are closely related to our locality including patient compliance for regular follow up , functional outcome , time to return to work and its socioeconomical impact and cosmetic results .

Surgical group will undergo surgical coverage of the fingertip defect by V-Y flap using the skin on the volar aspect of the same finger designed as V shaped then mobilized dorsally to cover the defect and stitches to be Y shaped. Stitches are removed after 2 weeks.

Conservative group will undergo minimal trimming of the bone end and an occlusive dressing that is changed on a weekly basis till complete healing of the defect that occurs after 6 weeks

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Assiut, Egypt
        • Faculty of Medicine Assiut University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 60 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • a. Inclusion criteria:

    1. Age Adults 12 - 60 years
    2. Diagnosis of fingertip injury with exposed bone (Allen type 2, 3 or 4) in any finger.
    3. Informed consent obtained by the patient.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • · Old or complicated fingertip injuries.

    • Non-exposed bone fingertip injury (Allen type1).
    • Patients with severe debilitating disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Flaps Coverage
Surgical group will undergo surgical coverage of the fingertip defect by V-Y flap using the skin on the volar aspect of the same finger designed as V shaped then mobilized dorsally to cover the defect and stitches to be Y shaped. Stitches are removed after 2 weeks.
Surgical group will undergo surgical coverage of the fingertip defect by V-Y flap using the skin on the volar aspect of the same finger designed as V shaped then mobilized dorsally to cover the defect and stitches to be Y shaped. Stitches are removed after 2 weeks.
Experimental: Occlusive Dressing
Conservative group will undergo minimal trimming of the bone end and an occlusive dressing that is changed on a weekly basis till complete healing of the defect that occurs after 6 weeks.
Conservative group will undergo minimal trimming of the bone end and an occlusive dressing that is changed on a weekly basis till complete healing of the defect that occurs after 6 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
quick DASH score
Time Frame: 6 months
A questionnaire consisting of eleven items that test the functional recovery following upper limb injury
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The presence of nail deformity.
Time Frame: 6 months
any nail deformity will be reported the most common is hook nail deformity and then the deformity wiil be classified according to the severity to mild moderate and severe
6 months
Pulp volume compared to the contralateral finger: on lateral X-ray
Time Frame: 6 months
either no decrease in the pulp volume or decreased to less than the half compared to the contralateral finger or more than the half compared to the contralateral finger
6 months
presence of painful neuroma
Time Frame: 6 months
absent or present if present either affect patient function or not
6 months
Sensory related outcome in the form of Two point discrimination test (Weber index)
Time Frame: 6 months
measurement and classification of Two point discrimination can be done by Touch-Test 2-Point Discriminator which consists of two sturdy, rotating, plastic disks that are joined together.Rounded tips are spaced at standard testing intervals from 1 to 15 mm apart. A 20 and 25 mm spacing also are given. One disk setting tests from 1 to 8mm, and the other setting tests from 9 to 15 mm. To change settings, just rotate the top disk until it clicks in place
6 months
Finger length: expressed as a shortage in mm. compared to contralateral finger.
Time Frame: 6 months
the shortage is classified to three items a) no shortage b) less half compared to contralateral finger and c) more than compared to contralateral finger
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 26, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 19, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

June 21, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AssiutUMAAFDD

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

whole study data and results will be available

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Injury Arm

Clinical Trials on Flaps Coverage

Search Similar Trials