Treatment of Children's Forearm Shaft Fractures With Biodegradable Intramedullary Nailing, Compared With Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing

June 14, 2023 updated by: Jaakko Sinikumpu, Oulu University Hospital

BIODEGRADATION OF POLYLACTIDE-CO-GLYCOLIDE INTRAMEDULLARY NAILS USED IN TREATMENT OF CHILDREN'S FOREARM SHAFT FRACTURES AND CLINICAL RECOVERY OF THE PATIENTS IN THE LONG-TERM.

The study purpose is to investigate long-term biodegradation process of the polylactide-co-glycolide (PLGA) intramedullary nails, used in treating the forearm shaft fractures in children. The primary objective of the study is to determine the stage of biodegradation of the polylactide-co-glycolide intramedullary nails, compared with the time since operation.

Biodegradation is to be evaluated by using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Potential adverse events, being related to the biodegradation process of the implant, will be recognized: fluid accumulation, sinus formation, osteolysis, swelling, cyst formation and other soft-tissue reactions in the surroundings of the former fracture will be evaluated.

Radiographic recovery at least 4 years after the implant operation is secondary aims of the study. Radiographic investigation (plain radiographs in lateral and anterior-posterior views) are taken to evaluate the signs of bone healing after the long-bone diaphysis fracture, including the resolution of the previous callus formation, tubularization of the long-bones around the previous fracture area and remodeling of the angular and rotational alignment.

Clinical recovery in the long-term (at least 4 years) is another secondary aim of the study.

Prospective observational study will be performed. The study population comprises all the cases who were participating in the previous RCT ("BIOABSORBABLE INTRAMEDULLARY NAIL FIXATION OF FOREARM FRACTURES IN CHILDREN") and were therefore treated by means of biodegradable intramedullary nailing in years 2010 to 2015 (N=16).

All these patients will be invited and at least 4-year follow-up visit is performed at out-hospital clinics in the study institutions and radiographs and MRI will be taken. Flynn's criteria, MAYO elbow performance score and mini-DASH will be used. Health-related quality of life is to be analysed by using Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL). Visual analogue scale will be used for determining residual pain. A comprehensive analysis concerning the radiographic bone healing, according to Lane-Sandhu -scoring is determined and biodegradation of the implants, including the tricalciumphosphate tip will be evaluated by using MRI.

Number of Patients: N=15

Diagnosis and Main Criteria for Inclusion and Exclusion:

The study cases of the previous original research, described above, will be used to comprise the study population of the current project. The subject and/or guardian are invited to the study by a postal letter and by a call in case of no show. A signed and dated informed consent is required upon the participation.

Costs: The patients are to be investigated for long-term recovery according to the normal treatment protocol and no extra costs are caused for the patients or the institutes. The reason for further long-term follow-up and further imaging at four years' mark is that the implants were still visible in the patients at their last follow-up visit in two years' mark, in the previous research that has been terminated.

Safety and ethical consideration:

There are no health-related issues in clinical investigation and MRI of the patients. The plain radiographs of the upper extremities predispose the participants to radiation, with equivalence to 1-2 days of background radiation (www.stuk.fi, radiation doses). However, radiographs are not taken of gravidae females.

The study causes burden for the participants due to follow-up visit. In case of children and adolescents, the parents' presence is appreciated. However, long-term follow-up is justified because of the history of several injury and invasive surgical treatment performed and in order to certain the final degradation of the used implant.

Statistical Methods:

The radiographic and clinical findings will be reported in descriptive means. The mean, range and standard deviation (SD) will be reported for the continous variables. The issues in the short-term recovery and the potential association between the short-term findings and long-term results are analysed by using the SND test for independent variables. Further, the association of the clinical findings and subjective symptoms with the degradation stage of the implants will be investigated. Other appropriate statistical methods may also be used. All P-values are two-tailed and the level of significance is set as <0.05.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

This is a prospective observational clinical study in two centers in Finland. The study cannot be executed in a blinded fashion, because all patients treated by the study method will be invited.

The study purpose is to investigate long-term biodegradation process of the polylactide-co-glycolide intramedullary nails, used in treating the forearm shaft fractures in children. It is aimed to determine the stage of biodegradation of the polylactide-co-glycolide intramedullary nails, compared with the time since operation and the potential complications and/or radiographic and clinical recovery at least 4 years after the implant implementation.

Close clinical recovery is another objective of the study.

Potential adverse events, being related to the biodegradation process of the implant, are to be evaluated: fluid accumulation, sinus formation, osteolysis, swelling, cyst formation. Further, the soft-tissue reaction in the surroundings of the former fracture will be evaluated.

Radiographic recovery will be be evaluated in means of plain radiograph investigation (plain radiographs in lateral and anterior-posterior views). The signs of bone healing after the long-bone diaphysis fracture, including the resolution of the previous callus formation, tubularization of the long-bones around the previous fracture area, remodeling of the angular and rotational alignment will be analyzed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Oulu, Finland, 90140
        • Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

4 years and older (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • • Patients who have participated in the previous study, concerning the surgical treatment of forearm shaft fracture and have been treated by biodegradable intramedullary nailing (BIN), using the polylactide-co-glycolide nails (ActivaNail).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • The cases that have primarily been enrolled but interrupted the first study because of new fracture and been therefore surgically fixed with traditional (metallic) implants will be excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing
BIN (biodegradable intramedullary nailing) method will be compared with the ESIN (elastic stable intramedullary nailing)
Unstable forearm shaft fractures are treated by the study method (BIN) or the control method (ESIN).
Other Names:
  • Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing (ESIN)
Experimental: Biodegradable intramedullary nailing
BIN method will be compared with the ESIN.
Unstable forearm shaft fractures are treated by the study method (BIN) or the control method (ESIN).
Other Names:
  • Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing (ESIN)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Biodegradation of the implants and remodeling. Visibility of the implant in imaging (MRI, magnetic resonance imaging)
Time Frame: at least 4 years.
Implant biodegradation and the remodeling of the fractured bone are to be evaluated by using different imaging modalities to view the residual implant. The biodegradation and remodeling will be described qualitatively, by the radiologist.
at least 4 years.
Biodegradation of the implants and remodeling. Visibility of the implant in imaging (radiographs)
Time Frame: at least 4 years
Implant biodegradation and the remodeling of the fractured bone are to be evaluated by using different imaging modalities to view the residual implant. The biodegradation and remodeling will be described qualitatively, by the radiologist.
at least 4 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical recovery (forearm rotation motions)
Time Frame: at least 4 years postinjury
Forearm rotation motion in pronation and supination (in left and right, by using a goniometer)
at least 4 years postinjury
Clinical recovery (elbow motion)
Time Frame: at least 4 years postinjury
Elbow motion by measuring a goniometer in left and right sides
at least 4 years postinjury
Clinical recovery (carrying angle)
Time Frame: at least 4 years postinjury
Ulno-humeral angle in degrees in left and right upper extremities
at least 4 years postinjury
Clinical recovery (grip strength)
Time Frame: at least 4 years postinjury
Grip strength by measured with using a hydraulic dynamometer in left and right sides
at least 4 years postinjury

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 5, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 4, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 13, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • University of Oulu

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Not applicable: there is a commercial sponsor who provided the implants and the study data is available only by request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fractures, Bone

Clinical Trials on Biodegradable Intramedullary Nailing (BIN)

3
Subscribe