Comparison of the Efficacy of Intra-articular Hybrid Hyaluronic Acid and Steroid in Patients With Rizoarthrosis

June 26, 2017 updated by: fioravanti antonella, University of Siena

Osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint (TMJ), also called rhizarthrosis is a common disease, mostly affecting post-menopausal women. Intra-articular therapy with hyaluronic acid (HA) was usually recommended as a second-line treatment after failure of non-pharmacological modalities, only in early stages of the disease .Aim of the present observational, retrospective, comparative study is the assessment of the efficacy and tolerability of i.a. injections of an hybrid HA formulation (Synovial H-L®) in comparison to triamcinolone in patients with TMJ Osteoarthritis (OA). We are analyzing the records collected in the departmental archives of outpatients affected by TMJ OA, according to the ACR criteria for the classification for hand OA and who were treated with i.a. Sinovial H-L or triamcinolone acetonide from December 1st, 2015 to December 1st 2016.The patient's assessment of spontaneous hand pain on a 0-100 mm VAS with 0 representing the absence of pain and the FIHOA score validated in Italian language were routinely recorded and documented in our centre prior to the injections (T0), at the time of the second i.a. administration (T1), after one month (T2) and after 3 (T3) and 6 months (T4) following the i.a. therapy.

The primary outcome criteria of our study is the change of VAS and FIHOA from baseline to the end of treatment. Furthermore, we chose as secondary outcomes the duration of morning stiffness, the Italian version of Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and the validated Italian version of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) routinary registered in our medical record before the i.a. therapy, at the end of the treatment and after 1, 3 and 6 months.

The chi square test, t test or Kruskal-Wallis test, as appropriated, will be used to evaluate differences between groups before i.a. treatment the clinical and demographical data.

Mixed-effects linear regression models will be used to evaluate temporal trends and differences in the two groups for specific outcomes: VAS pain, VAS stiffness, FIHOA and PCS and MCS from SF-36 questionnaires. In these types of statistical models, the effects of the covariates and their standard errors are correctly estimated taking into account the hierarchical structure of the data (i.e., patients and visits). For the compute of SF-36s Z score will be used mean and SD of U.S. general population. Data analysis will be performed using Stata vers 13.0 software. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize data as frequencies (categorical variables) or mean +/-SD (continuous variables) as appropriate. P values <0.05 is considered statistically significant.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Italy
      • Siena, Italy, 53100
        • Azienda Ospedaliera senese

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

41 years to 71 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

100 patients of both sex affected by TMJ OA

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • clinical symptoms in the treated thumb for at least 3 months prior to the beginning of i.a. treatment with at least 30 mm on a 0-100 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and a Functional Index for Hand OA (FIHOA) score of at least 6
  • radiographic evidence of TMJ OA within the previous 6 months with a radiological score of II-III (using the Kellgren method)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • any inflammatory joint disease
  • septic arthritis
  • major trauma
  • prior surgery of the hand, wrist, and elbow
  • coagulation disorders
  • severe comorbidity
  • past therapy with chondroitin sulfate, glucosamine, diacerein, steroids by any route of administration
  • i.a. injection of any joint with corticosteroids or HA during the previous 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Sinovial H-L Group
The patients treated have received one cycle of two injections (at baseline and 15 days apart) of 1 ml of Sinovial H-L® (3.2% - 16mg + 16mg, Ibsa).
Device: Sinovial H-L
Patients were treated with an hybrid form of hyaluronic acid (Sinovial H-L) obtained through thermo-chemical processes from the combination of high (1100-1400 kDa) and low (80-100 kDa) MW fractions.
Control Group
The patients have received two i.a. injections (at baseline and 15 days apart) of 0.5 ml of triamcinolone acetonide (Kenacort® 20 mg, Bristol-Myers Squibb Srl).
Drug: Triamcinolone Acetonide
The patients have received two i.a. injections (at baseline and 15 days apart) of 0.5 ml of triamcinolone acetonide (Kenacort® 20 mg, Bristol-Myers Squibb Srl)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of VAS
Time Frame: basal time; 2 weeks; 1 month; 3 months; 6 months
0-100 mm VAS with 0 representing the absence of pain.
basal time; 2 weeks; 1 month; 3 months; 6 months
Change of FIHOA
Time Frame: basal time; 2 weeks; 1 month; 3 months; 6 months
FIHOA validated in Italian language
basal time; 2 weeks; 1 month; 3 months; 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of duration of morning stiffness
Time Frame: basal time; 2 weeks;1 month; 3 months; 6 months
measured in minutes
basal time; 2 weeks;1 month; 3 months; 6 months
Change of Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)
Time Frame: basal time; 2 weeks; 1 month; 3 months; 6 months
Italian version of HAQ
basal time; 2 weeks; 1 month; 3 months; 6 months
Change of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36)
Time Frame: basal time; 2 weeks; 1 month; 3 months; 6 months
validated Italian version of SF-36
basal time; 2 weeks; 1 month; 3 months; 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Siena

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sara Tenti, MD, University of Siena

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 24, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 31, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 14, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 26, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 27, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 27, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 26, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • COMB-IAL-V-TRIAM 01

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis Thumb

Clinical Trials on Sinovial H-L

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings