Effects of Ecological Rythmic-acoustic Stimulation (E-RAS) on Motor Skills in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease

July 21, 2017 updated by: Massimiliano Pau, University of Cagliari

Effects of Ecological Rythmic-acoustic Stimulation (E-RAS) on Motor Skills in Individuals

The use of rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS) has been proven useful in the management of gait disturbances induced by Parkinson's disease (PD). Typically, the stimuli used to provide RAS consist of metronome or music-based sounds, which are not related with the auditory experience of walking. Based on previous laboratory research, it is hypothesized that the use of ecological sounds deriving from biological motion (i.e., footstep sounds) could have a greater impact compared to artificial sounds (i.e., metronome sounds), within a rehabilitation program. In a double-blind experiment, it was investigated the effects of 5 weeks of supervised rehabilitation integrated with RAS. Thirty-two individuals affected by PD (age 68.2 ± 10.5, Hoehn and Yahr 1,5-3) were randomly assigned to one of the two conditions (artificial vs. ecological sounds). Spatio-temporal parameters of gait and clinical variables were assessed before the rehabilitation period, at its end, and after a 3-month follow-up. The results revealed that the rehabilitation program integrated with RAS had positive effects on the majority of objective and subjective measures, independently of the type of sound. However, when the two groups were examined separately, the patients assigned to the ecological RAS condition were the only who improved both in terms of cadence and gait speed. Overall, the hypothesized greater effect of the ecological sounds compared to artificial sounds was only partially supported by data.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cagliari, Italy, 09100
        • General Hospital "G. Brotzu"

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 90 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosis of PD according to the UK Brain Bank criteria;
  • ability to walk independently;
  • absence of relevant hearing impairments which could prevent the correct perception of the auditory cues;
  • absence of significant cognitive impairment (i.e., Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) > 24; Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) > 13);
  • absence of psychiatric or severe systemic illnesses;
  • mild-to-moderate disability assessed by means of the modified Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) staging scale (1,5 ≤ H&Y ≤ 3);
  • no engagement in any rehabilitative program in the 3 months before the beginning of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Artificial Sounds

Participants were provided headphones and a portable MP3 device which played a metronome tick at specified rhythm calculated as follows: a) if a patient's cadence was below the normality, the BPM of the stimulus was set at a value of 10% higher than one's own cadence; b) if a patient's cadence was below, but close to normality (less than 10% difference), the BPM of the stimulus was set at normality values; c) if a patient's cadence was above the normality, the BPM of the stimulus was set at a value equal to one's own cadence.

Participants performed daily 30 minutes of walking assisted by the rhythmic acoustic stimuli.

The intervention consist in 5 weeks, 20 min/day gait training assisted by rhythmic acoustic stimuli administered using a portable MP3 player
EXPERIMENTAL: Ecological Sounds

Participants were provided headphones and a portable MP3 device which played an ecological rhythmic sound obtained by actual footsteps of human at specified rhythm calculated as follows: a) if a patient's cadence was below the normality, the BPM of the stimulus was set at a value of 10% higher than one's own cadence; b) if a patient's cadence was below, but close to normality (less than 10% difference), the BPM of the stimulus was set at normality values; c) if a patient's cadence was above the normality, the BPM of the stimulus was set at a value equal to one's own cadence.

Participants performed daily 30 minutes of walking assisted by the rhythmic acoustic stimuli.

The intervention consist in 5 weeks, 20 min/day gait training assisted by rhythmic acoustic stimuli administered using a portable MP3 player

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Walking speed
Time Frame: 5 weeks
Walking speed calculated on a 10 m path using motion-capture system
5 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hip Flexion-extension
Time Frame: 5 weeks
Angle of flexion-extension of hip joint during a gait cycle
5 weeks
Knee Flexion-extension
Time Frame: 5 weeks
Angle of flexion-extension of knee joint during a gait cycle
5 weeks
Ankle Dorsi- Plantar-flexion
Time Frame: 5 weeks
Angle of dorsi- plantar-flexion of ankle joint during a gait cycle
5 weeks
GPS
Time Frame: 5 weeks
Gait Profile Score (synthetic index of deviation from a physiologic gait pattern)
5 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 31, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 21, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

July 25, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 25, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PG/2014/17870

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on Administration of rhytmic acoustic stimuli for gait training

Search Similar Trials