GaitBetter: Motor and Cognitive Training for Gait Rehabilitation and Falls Prevention in Stroke Survivors.

August 4, 2022 updated by: Paolo Bonato, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
In this research study, the investigators aim to test the usability and efficacy of the GaitBetter system for gait rehabilitation after stroke.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study consists of 3 distinct aims:

In Aim 1, the investigators will evaluate clinical acceptance of the GaitBetter solution by subjects and therapists. To do so, the investigators will run a pilot study to gather feedback from stakeholders (not reported here).

In Aim 2, the investigators will evaluate the efficacy of using the GaitBetter solution to improve motor-cognitive function of chronic stroke survivors. To do so, the investigators will run a single-arm, non-randomized study to test the hypothesis that the GaitBetter training is effective in improving gait and cognition in individuals with chronic stroke.

In Aim 3, the investigators will explore the efficacy of using the GaitBetter solution for improving rehabilitation outcomes in sub-acute stroke survivors. To do so, the investigators will run a randomized, controlled study to evaluate the effects of using the GaitBetter system in patients with subacute stroke on recovery trajectory.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

76

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02129
        • Recruiting
        • Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital Boston
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Paolo Bonato, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and females of age between 18 to 85 year of age
  • History of one-sided ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke

    • Chronic: more than 6 months post-stroke (Aim 1 and Aim 2)
    • Subacute: within 8 weeks post-stroke (Aim 1 and Aim 3)
  • Residual functional impairment of a lower extremity as a result of the stroke
  • Ability to walk at least 15 meters with or without assistive devices (FIM walk subsection, levels 6 and 7)
  • Ability to walk 3 consecutive minutes (5 minutes for Aim 2) on a treadmill at a speed equal to or greater than 0.22 m/s (0.8 km/h or 0.5 mph) with or without hand support.
  • Medical clearance received from treating physician to participate in the gait training program proposed in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe aphasia limiting the ability to express needs or discomfort verbally or non-verbally
  • Cognitive impairment limiting the ability to understand and follow instructions (as assessed by a score <23 on the Mini Mental State Examination)
  • Previous diagnosis of neurological diseases other than stroke
  • Recent history of lower extremity fractures (<12 months ago), unhealed wounds
  • Current indication for isolation precautions (e.g. MRSA, VRE, C. difficile, and others)
  • Severe visual impairments (as assessed by the NIH Stroke Scale Visual Field subscale. score >0)
  • Hemispatial neglect (as assessed by the Line Bisection Test)
  • Subjects diagnosed with a medical condition that would interfere with their participation in regular sustained exercise (such as a severe pulmonary and/or cardiovascular condition)
  • For Aim 2: currently participating in a gait training intervention (PT or research)
  • Adults with impaired decision-making capacity
  • Women who are pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Aim 2: Efficacy of the GaitBetter to improve motor-cognitive function of chronic stroke survivors
The investigators propose a single-arm, non-randomized study to test the hypothesis that the GaitBetter training is effective in improving gait and cognition in individuals with chronic stroke. This design was chosen given the expected stability of functional recovery in this population.
Participants will receive gait training with the GaitBetter solution for a total of 15 sessions (3 days a week for 5 weeks) each lasting approximately 45 minutes.
Experimental: Aim 3: Efficacy of the GaitBetter to improve rehabilitation outcomes in sub-acute stroke survivors
The investigators propose a randomized, controlled study to evaluate the effects of using the GaitBetter system in patients with subacute stroke on recovery trajectory.
Participants will receive gait training with the GaitBetter solution for a total of 15 sessions (3 days a week for 5 weeks) each lasting approximately 45 minutes. In addition, the investigators will record the number and duration of therapy sessions followed by the participant during standard of care.
Participants will follow their standard of care. The investigators will record the number and duration of therapy sessions followed during standard of care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
10 meter walk test (in chronic stroke survivors, Aim 2)
Time Frame: Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Evaluation of gait speed of chronic stroke survivors, in meters per second
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
10 meter walk test (in subacute stroke survivors, Aim 3)
Time Frame: Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Evaluation of gait speed of subacute stroke survivors, in meters per second
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Trail making test (in chronic stroke survivors, Aim 2)
Time Frame: Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Evaluation of cognition status, in chronic stroke survivors. The test record the time to accomplish the task (higher values indicate slower performance)
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Trail making test (in subacute stroke survivors, Aim 3)
Time Frame: Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Evaluation of cognition status, in subacute stroke survivors. The test record the time to accomplish the task (higher values indicate slower performance)
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Balance Evaluation Systems Test (mini-BESTest, in chronic stroke survivors, Aim 2)
Time Frame: Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Comprehensive evaluation of balance and falls risks in chronic stroke survivors. Score from 0 to 108. Higher scores are reflecting better balance
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Aim 3: Balance Evaluation Systems Test (mini-BESTest, in subacute stroke survivors, Aim 3)
Time Frame: Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Comprehensive evaluation of balance and falls risks in subacute stroke survivors. Score from 0 to108. Higher scores are reflecting better balance
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Step length (in chronic stroke survivors, Aim 2)
Time Frame: Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Evaluation of gait step length in chronic stroke survivors with an 3D motion capture system (in meters)
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Step length (in subacute stroke survivors, Aim 3)
Time Frame: Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Evaluation of gait step length in subacute stroke survivors with an 3D motion capture system (in meters)
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Step width (in chronic stroke survivors, Aim 2)
Time Frame: Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Evaluation of gait step width in chronic stroke survivors with an 3D motion capture system (in meters)
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Step width (in subacute stroke survivors, Aim 3)
Time Frame: Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Evaluation of gait step width in subacute stroke survivors with an 3D motion capture system (in meters)
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Step symmetry (in chronic stroke survivors, Aim 2)
Time Frame: Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Evaluation of gait step symmetry in chronic stroke survivors with an 3D motion capture system (ratio between paretic and non-paretic leg)
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Step symmetry (in subacute stroke survivors, Aim 3)
Time Frame: Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Evaluation of gait step symmetry in subacute stroke survivors with an 3D motion capture system (ratio between paretic and non-paretic leg)
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Stance time (in chronic stroke survivors, Aim 2)
Time Frame: Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Evaluation of gait stance time in chronic stroke survivors with an 3D motion capture system (in seconds)
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Stance time (in subacute stroke survivors, Aim 3)
Time Frame: Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Evaluation of gait stance time in subacute stroke survivors with an 3D motion capture system (in seconds)
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Swing time (in chronic stroke survivors, Aim 2)
Time Frame: Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Evaluation of gait swing time in chronic stroke survivors with an 3D motion capture system (in seconds)
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Swing time (in subacute stroke survivors, Aim 3)
Time Frame: Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Evaluation of gait swing time in subacute stroke survivors with an 3D motion capture system (in seconds)
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (in chronic stroke survivors, Aim 2)
Time Frame: Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Measure of the cognitive status in chronic stroke survivors
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (in subacute stroke survivors, Aim 3)
Time Frame: Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Measure of the cognitive status in subacute stroke survivors
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Symbol-Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) (in subacute stroke survivors, Aim 2)
Time Frame: Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Measure of the cognitive status in chronic stroke survivors
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Symbol-Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) (in subacute stroke survivors, Aim 3)
Time Frame: Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Measure of the cognitive status in subacute stroke survivors
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (Revised) (in chronic stroke survivors, Aim 2)
Time Frame: Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Measure of the cognitive status in chronic stroke survivors
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (Revised) (in subacute stroke survivors, Aim 3)
Time Frame: Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Measure of the cognitive status in subacute stroke survivors
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
2-minutes walk test (2mwt) (in chronic stroke survivors, Aim 2)
Time Frame: Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Measure of the gait endurance in chronic stroke survivors
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
2-minutes walk test (2mwt) (in subacute stroke survivors, Aim 3)
Time Frame: Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Measure of the gait endurance in subacute stroke survivors
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) (in chronic stroke survivors, Aim 2)
Time Frame: Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Measure of the gait mobility, balance and falls risks in chronic stroke survivors
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) (in subacute stroke survivors, Aim 3)
Time Frame: Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Measure of the gait mobility, balance and falls risks in subacute stroke survivors
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) (in chronic stroke survivors, Aim 2)
Time Frame: Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Self-reported measure of quality of life
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) (in subacute stroke survivors, Aim 3)
Time Frame: Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)
Self-reported measure of quality of life
Change from baseline scores at post-intervention (after 5 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Paolo Bonato, PhD, Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 23, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 27, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 12, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 5, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Treadmill gait training with GaitBetter

3
Subscribe