A Comparative Study of Two Dry Needling Interventions for Plantar Heel Pain

January 23, 2021 updated by: ZAID AL BOLOUSHI, Universidad de Zaragoza

A Comparative Study of Two Dry Needling Interventions for Plantar Heel Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

This is a clinical trial that will be done in the state of Kuwait, at the physical rehabilitation medicine hospital. the participants will be recruited from all over Kuwait, there is a clinical registry upon the ethical committee in Kuwait assigned by the ministry of health.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Physical therapy approaches continue evolving. During the last years, minimally invasive techniques such as percutaneous needle electrolysis (PNE) was being developed, obtaining promising results for tendon pathology. PNE technique is a minimally invasive treatment that consists of an application of a galvanic electrolytic current that causes a controlled local inflammatory process in the target tissue. This allows for phagocytosis and the subsequent regeneration of the affected tissue. Nowadays, PNE is being used in clinical practice to manage MTrP, but there are no studies supporting that they have an additional beneficial effect over DN.

From a biological point of view, it seems reasonable to ascertain that a patient will obtain benefits thanks to the mechanical effects provided by the needle and that patients may benefit more if the electrolysis effect is added to the mechanical stimuli provided by the needle. Therefore, the aim of this randomized controlled study is to compare the effectiveness of DN versus PNE for the level of pain in patients suffering from PHP.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

102

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kuwait, Kuwait
        • Physical Medicine and rehabilitation Kuwait

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of PHP in accordance with the Clinical Guidelines linked to the International Classification of Function, Disability, and Health from the Orthopedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association
  • Age greater than 21 years according to the Kuwaiti law.
  • History of plantar heel pain for greater than one month.
  • Walking 50 meters without any support
  • Having MTPs on initial physical examination on plantar and calf muscles
  • Accepting to be treated by a male physiotherapist.
  • Capacity to understand the study and the informed consent, as well as having signed the document.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - Needle phobia
  • Allergy from needles or hypersensitivity to metals
  • Presence of coagulopathy or use of anticoagulants
  • Presence of peripheral arterial vascular disease
  • Pregnancy
  • Dermatological disease with the dry needling area
  • The presence of a chronic medical condition that might preclude participation in the study such as malignancy, systemic inflammatory disorders (e.g. psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, septic arthritis), neurological diseases, polyneuropathy, mononeuropathy.
  • Treatment of plantar heel pain with needling or acupuncture during last 4 weeks.
  • A history of injection therapy in the heel in the previous three months.
  • Previous history of foot surgery or fracture.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dry needling (DN) arm
Once the clinician locates the MTrP, he will insert the needle over it and he will do a quick entry of the needle. The chosen technique to manipulate the needle will be Hong technique, which consist of quick entry and exit of the needle (fast in/fast out) to get local twitch response (LTR), it will be repeated 5 times with a rhythmic movement of 1Hz/sec. LTRs will be counted and registered.
The electrotherapy equipment used (Enruf) produces a continuous galvanic current through the cathode (modified electrosurgical scalpel with the needle) while the patient holds the anode (handheld electrode) (42). Once the needle have reach the relevant treatment area, a continuous current of 3 pulses at an intensity of 3 1.5 mA for 5 seconds conveyed to the muscle will be applied.
Other Names:
  • Percutaneous needle electrolysis
Active Comparator: Percutaneous needle electrolysis (PNE) arm
The electrotherapy equipment used (Enraf) produces a continuous galvanic current through the cathode (modified electrosurgical scalpel with the needle) while the patient holds the anode (handheld electrode). Once the needle have reach the relevant treatment area, a continuous current of 3 pulses at an intensity of 3, 1.5 mA for 5 seconds conveyed to the muscle will be applied. It will be done exactly the same way as in the DN group with the only difference that the needle will be transmitting the electrical current.
The electrotherapy equipment used (Enruf) produces a continuous galvanic current through the cathode (modified electrosurgical scalpel with the needle) while the patient holds the anode (handheld electrode) (42). Once the needle have reach the relevant treatment area, a continuous current of 3 pulses at an intensity of 3 1.5 mA for 5 seconds conveyed to the muscle will be applied.
Other Names:
  • Percutaneous needle electrolysis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Foot Health Status Questioner (FHSQ) PAIN
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks, 52 weeks
Participants will complete the FHSQ at baseline and at 4, 8, 12, 26, and 52 weeks post-treatment. The FHSQ consists of 13 questions reflecting fourfoot health-related domains: pain (4 questions), function (4 questions), footwear (3 questions), and general foot health (2 questions). Individual item scores will then be re-coded, tabulated, and finally transformed to a scale ranging from 0 to 100 for each of the four domains. Greater scores reflect better foot health and quality of life. The FHSQ has been validated and has been used in similar trials that have evaluated the effectiveness of different interventions for plantar heel pain
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks, 52 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VAS Maximum
Time Frame: 1st session (baseline), 2nd session (week 2), 3rd session (week 3), 4th session (week 4)
Participants will complete the visual analogue scale (VAS) before each treatment session, considering the level of pain they have just before start the treatment session and the highest level of pain they have had during the last 48 hours. The exact words of the questions will be: 1) what is the level of pain, as average, you have feel during last 48 hours?; and 2) what is the maximum level of pain you have feel during last 48 hours? Participants will be explained that a score of 0 indicates the absence of pain whereas a score of 10 represents the maximum tolerable pain. The VAS is widely used and is valid and reliable
1st session (baseline), 2nd session (week 2), 3rd session (week 3), 4th session (week 4)
The Quality of Life (QoL) Will be Assessed With the EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks, 52 weeks"
The EQ-5D-5L self-report questionnaire is a descriptive system with five questions, each representing one dimension of health-related QoL, that is, mobility, self-care, daily activities, pain/discomfort and depression/anxiety. Each dimension can be rated on five levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. Scoring is based on a 0 to 100% scale, where 100% represent the best QoL.
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks, 52 weeks"

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 14, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 10, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 2, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 26, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ALBOLOUSHI

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

ACCORDING TO THE LAW AND REGULATIONS FROM THE ETHICAL COMMITTEE IN KUWAIT. I CAN'T SHARE THE NAME OF THE PATIENTS, THEIR CONTACT OR ID. OTHER DATA WHICH ARE RELATED TO THE STUDY I CAN SHARE.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Plantar Fascitis

Clinical Trials on dry needling

Search Similar Trials