Evaluation of SPN-812 (Viloxazine Extended-release Capsule) Low Dose in Children With ADHD

June 30, 2021 updated by: Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Evaluation of SPN-812 (Viloxazine Extended-release Capsule) 100 and 200 mg Efficacy and Safety in Children With ADHD - A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Pivotal Trial

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of low doses of SPN-812 in children 6-11 years of age diagnosed with ADHD.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-arm, parallel-group study, to assess the efficacy and safety of SPN-812 as monotherapy for the treatment of children 6-11 years old with ADHD.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
477

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Dothan, Alabama, United States, 36303
        • Harmonex Neuroscience Research
    • Florida
      • Hialeah, Florida, United States, 33012
        • Indago Research & Health Center, Inc.
    • Idaho
      • Meridian, Idaho, United States, 83642
        • Advanced Clinical Research
    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14618
        • Finger Lakes Clinical Research
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77098
        • Houston Clinical Trials
      • The Woodlands, Texas, United States, 77381
        • Family Psychiatry of The Woodlands
    • Utah
      • Orem, Utah, United States, 84058
        • Aspen Clinical Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 7 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Healthy male or female subjects, 6-11 years of age, inclusive.
  2. Diagnosis of ADHD according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (DSM-5), confirmed with the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents (MINI-KID).
  3. Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-5, Home Version: Child, Investigator Administered and Scored (ADHD-RS-5) score of at least 28.
  4. CGI-S score of at least 4 at screening.
  5. Weight of at least 20 kg.
  6. Free of medication for the treatment of ADHD for at least one week prior to randomization and agreement to remain so throughout the study.
  7. Considered medically healthy by the Investigator via assessment of physical examination, medical history, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, and electrocardiogram.
  8. Written informed consent obtained from the subject's parent or legal representative and informed assent from the subject, if applicable.

  9. Females of childbearing potential (FOCP) must be either sexually inactive (abstinent) or, if sexually active, must agree to use one of the following acceptable birth control methods beginning 30 days prior to the first dose, throughout the study:

    1. simultaneous use of male condom and intra-uterine contraceptive device placed at least four weeks prior to the first study drug administration
    2. surgically sterile male partner
    3. simultaneous use of male condom and diaphragm with spermicide
    4. established hormonal contraceptive

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Current diagnosis of major psychiatric disorders. Subjects with Major Depressive Disorder are allowed in the study if the subject is free of episodes both currently and for the last six months.
  2. Current diagnosis of major neurological disorders. Subjects with seizures or a history of seizure disorder within the immediate family (siblings, parents), or a history of seizure-like events are excluded from the study.
  3. Current diagnosis of significant systemic disease.
  4. Evidence of suicidality (defined as either active suicidal plan/intent or active suicidal thoughts, or more than one lifetime suicide attempt) within the six months before Screening or at Screening.
  5. BMI greater than 95th percentile for the appropriate age and gender.
  6. History of an allergic reaction to viloxazine or related drugs.
  7. Any food allergy, intolerance, restriction or special diet that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could contraindicate the subject's participation in this study.
  8. Subjects who received any investigational drug within the longer of 30 days or 5 half-lives prior to Day 1 dosing of SM.
  9. Any reason, which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would prevent the subject from participating in the study.
  10. Positive drug screen at the Screening Visit. A positive test for amphetamines is allowed for subjects receiving a stimulant ADHD medication at Screening; the subject will be required to discontinue the stimulant for the study, beginning at least one week prior to the Baseline Visit.
  11. Pregnancy or refusal to practice abstinence or acceptable birth control during the study (for female subjects of childbearing potential).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo, qd, oral capsule
Drug: Placebo
Placebo was administered once daily
Other Names:
  • PBO
Experimental: 100mg SPN-812
100mg SPN-812, qd, oral capsule
Drug: 100mg SPN-812
100mg SPN-812 was administered once daily and compared to placebo
Other Names:
  • SPN-812
Experimental: 200mg SPN-812
200mg SPN-812, qd, oral capsule
Drug: 200mg SPN-812
200mg SPN-812 was administered once daily and compared to placebo
Other Names:
  • SPN-812

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy of SPN-812 Assessed by Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 6 (End of Study)
The Primary Endpoint was the change from baseline in the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5) Total score at Week 6 (End of Study). The ADHD-RS-5 is an ADHD-specific rating scale designed and validated to assess current ADHD symptomatology. The scale consists of 18 items that directly correspond to the 18 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) symptoms of ADHD. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale from 0 (never or rarely) to 3 (very often). A Total score is calculated by adding the responses of all 18 items (range: 0-54; the higher the score, the more severe the ADHD symptoms). Lower change from baseline scores (<0) represent a better outcome.
Baseline and Week 6 (End of Study)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale
Time Frame: Week 6 (End of Study)
The first Key Secondary Endpoint was the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale score at Week 6 (End of Study). The CGI-I scale is a single item assessment of how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state prior to the beginning of treatment. The CGI-I is rated on a 7-point Likert scale from 1 to 7, where 1 = "very much improved" and 7 = "very much worse." Successful therapy is indicated by a lower overall score in subsequent testing.
Week 6 (End of Study)
Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Report (WFIRS-P)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 6 (End of Study)
The third Key Secondary Endpoint was the change from baseline in the Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Report (WFIRS-P) Total Average score at Week 6 (End of Study). The WFIRS instrument evaluates ADHD-related functional impairment. The WFIRS-P is completed by the child's parent/guardian and is comprised of 50 items grouped into six domains: Family (10 items), School (10 items, includes learning [4 items] and behavior [6 items]), Life Skills (10 items), Child's Self-Concept (3 items), Social Activities (7 items), and Risky Activities (10 items). The parent/guardian rates each item on a 4-point Likert scale (0-3; where 0=never or not at all to 3= very often or very much) based on their child's behavior past month. A Total Average score was computed by calculating mean rating of all 50 items (ranging from 0 to 3, where a higher value represents more severe functional impairment). Lower change from baseline Total Average scores (<0) represent a better outcome.
Baseline and Week 6 (End of Study)
Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by 50% Responder Rate Per the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5)
Time Frame: Week 6 (End of Study)
An additional secondary endpoint was the percentage of responders at Week 6 (End of Study). A responder was defined as a subject who had a 50% or greater reduction (improvement) in their change from baseline Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5) Total score at Week 6 (End of Study). Values range from 0 to 100%. A higher percentage represents a greater number of responders.
Week 6 (End of Study)
Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by the Hyperactivity/Impulsivity Subscale and the Inattention Subscale of the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 6 (End of Study)
An additional secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5) Hyperactivity/Impulsivity subscale score and Inattention subscale score at Week 6 (End of Study). The ADHD-RS-5 is an ADHD-specific rating scale designed and validated to assess current ADHD symptomatology. The scale consists of 18 items that directly correspond to the 18 DSM-5 symptoms of ADHD, including 9 items for the Hyperactivity/Impulsivity subscale and 9 items for the Inattention subscale. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale from 0 (never or rarely) to 3 (very often). Each subscale score is calculated by adding the responses of all respective 9 items (range: 0-27; the higher the subscale score, the more severe the Hyperactivity/Impulsivity or Inattention symptoms). Lower change from baseline subscale scores (<0) represent a better outcome.
Baseline and Week 6 (End of Study)
Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Categorical Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) [the Percentage of Subjects Who Were 'Improved"]
Time Frame: Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6
An additional secondary endpoint was the percentage of subjects who were "improved" by visit; "improved" was defined as a subject who had a Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) score of 1 = "Very Much Improved" or 2 = "Much Improved". Values range from 0 to 100%. A higher percentage represents a greater number of subjects who were "improved".
Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6
Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Conners 3 - Parent Short Form (C3PS)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 6 (End of Study)
The second Key Secondary Endpoint was the change from baseline in the Conners 3rd Edition - Parent Short Form (C3PS) Composite T-score at Week 6 (End of Study). The Conners 3rd Edition is a focused diagnostic tool for the assessment of ADHD and associated learning, behavior, and emotional problems in children 6 to 18 years of age. The C3PS is completed by a child's parent/guardian and is comprised of 45 items with subsets of items related to six content scales: inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity, executive functioning, learning problems, defiance/aggression and peer relations. The parent rates his/her child on the first 43 items of the C3PS using a 4-point Likert scale (0-3; where 0=not at all true [never, seldom] and 3=very much true [very often, very frequently]) based on past month; the last 2 items are fill-in-the-blank and do not contribute to the raw score(s). Raw scores are converted to T-scores. Lower change from baseline T-scores (<0) represent a better outcome.
Baseline and Week 6 (End of Study)
Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Parenting Stress Index, Fourth Edition, Short Form (PSI-4-SF)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 6 (End of Study)
An additional secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in Parenting Stress Index, Fourth Edition, Short Form (PSI-4-SF) Total score at Week 6 (End of Study). The PSI-4 questionnaire evaluates the magnitude of stress in the parent-child relationship based on the parent's perception of the child's characteristics, the personal characteristics of the parent, and the interaction between the parent and the child. The PSI-4-SF was developed for parents of children ages 1 month to 12 years. The PSI-4-SF consists of 36 items divided into three domains: parental distress, parent-child dysfunctional interaction, and difficult child. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale, where SD=Strongly Disagree, D=Disagree, NS=Not Sure, A=Agree, and SA=Strongly Agree. The total score ranges between 90 and 450; higher total scores indicate higher levels of stress. Lower change from baseline total scores (<0) represent better outcome.
Baseline and Week 6 (End of Study)
Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Conners 3 - Self Report Short Form (C3-SRS)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 6 (End of Study)
An additional secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in the Conners 3rd Edition - Self Report Short Form (C3-SRS) Composite T score at Week 6 (End of Study). The Conners 3rd Edition is a focused diagnostic tool for assessment of ADHD and associated learning, behavior, and emotional problems in children 6 to 18 years of age. The C3-SRS, which is only validated in children/adolescents 8-18 years of age, is comprised of 41 items with subsets of items related to five content scales: inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity, learning problems, aggression and family relations. The subject rates himself/herself on the first 39 items of C3-SRS using a 4-point Likert scale (0-3; where 0=not at all true [never, seldom] and 3=very much true [very often, very frequently] based on past month; the last 2 items are fill-in-the-blank and do not contribute to the raw score(s). Raw scores are converted to T-scores. Lower change from baseline T-scores (<0) represent a better outcome.
Baseline and Week 6 (End of Study)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Stefan Schwabe, MD, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 20, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 12, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 12, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 9, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 9, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 11, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 30, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 812P301

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ADHD

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings