Predictive Role of New Biomarkers for Hypersensitive Patients to Radiation in Breast Cancer (BIORISE) (BIORISE)

April 1, 2025 updated by: Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle

Radiation-induced Late Side-effects: Predictive Role of New Biomarkers for Selecting Hypersensitive Patients to Ionizing Radiation in Breast Cancer (BIORISE)

To confirm the protein expression level in radiation-induced late effects patients and to determine the performance value, in particular the positive predictive value, of a blood test based on the dosage of a panel of five proteins, it is necessary to validate these preliminary results by a prospective study on a large cohort of patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Molecular mechanisms involved in radiation-induced responses are complex, and proteomic approaches can be used to better understand the overall reaction process of ionizing radiation and to identify potential radio-sensitive predictive markers. Until now, few publications have addressed the determination of radiosensitive patients.

Based on our previous results and in order to improve the positive predictive value of the radiation induced late effect assay, we developed a quantitative proteomic approach to identify predictive radiobiological markers in patients with severe toxicity. First, four patients were selected with a low RILA value from the prospective studies mentioned above. Two patients had no toxicity at least four years after the end of treatment whereas two others patients developed a severe toxicity greater than grade 2. T-lymphocytes have been isolated from whole blood and half of them have been irradiated in vitro. It will then performed a quantitative proteomics workflow using an 8-plex iTRAQ labeling and after several fractionations to optimize resolution of analysis (off gel fractionation followed by nanoliquid chromatography), proteins were identified by tandem mass spectrometry (4800 plus MALDI TOF/TOF). More than 1300 total proteins were identified with high confidence (95%, one unique peptide). At 0 Gy, 135 proteins were differentially expressed between patients with or without severe radio-induced toxicity. In irradiated T-lymphocytes (8 Gy), 107 proteins were differentially expressed between patients with or without severe radio-induced toxicity. Among them, five proteins (AK2, adenylate kinase 2; IDH2, isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (NADP+); ANX1, annexin 1; APEX1, DNA-(apurinic or apyrimidinic site) lyase, and HSC70, Heat shock cognate 71 kDa) with the highest protein expression ratio (>1.5) and that showed no difference expression ratio in 0 Gy controls, were selected for consecutive validation. These proteins are involved in several mechanisms including metabolism and energy production, apoptosis, calcium binding protein, and DNA damages repair. These five proteins are currently the subject of patent application.

Then,10 other patients will be recruited (5 patients with grade ≥ 2 breast fibrosis and 5 patients without toxicity) who presented a low RILA value to validate proteins expression by western-blotting. Results showed that all proteins were overexpressed in irradiated T-lymphocytes patients with severe toxicity comparatively to patients without toxicity.

However, to confirm the protein expression level in radiation-induced late effects patients and to determine the performance value, in particular the positive predictive value, of a blood test based on the dosage of a panel of five proteins, it is necessary to validate these preliminary results by a prospective study on a large cohort of patients

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
500

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Montpellier, France, 34298
        • Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients suitable for adjuvant radiotherapy for cancer of the breast (invasive or in situ) including breast patients receiving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients receiving chemotherapy should have completed their course of chemotherapy (anthracyclines) at least one month prior to radiotherapy commencing.
  • No other malignancy prior to treatment for the specified tumour types except basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin
  • No evidence of distant metastases
  • Patients able to provide a venous blood sample
  • Willingness and ability to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plans and available for follow up
  • Greater than 18 years of age; no upper age limit
  • The capacity to understand the patient information sheet and the ability to provide written informed consent
  • Patients must be affiliated to a Social Security System

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with metastatic disease
  • Prior irradiation at the same site
  • Planned use of protons
  • Breast patients receiving concomitant chemo-radiation
  • Male breast cancer patients
  • Mastectomy patients
  • Bilateral breast cancer
  • Mental disability or patient otherwise unable to give informed consent
  • Limited life expectancy due to co-morbidity
  • Pregnant patients
  • Partial breast irradiation
  • Patients with breast implants if not removed during surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: blood sample
Pre-treatment blood samples will be collected: 8 samples
Biological: Blood sample

Pre-treatment blood samples will be collected for downstream analyses:

  • Three 6 ml EDTA samples for proteomic and genomic work package
  • One 6 ml dry sample for auto-antibodies analysis in the immunology work package
  • Two 4 ml EDTA samples for DNA extraction in the immunology work package
  • Two 2.5 ml PAX Gene sample for RNA extraction in the immunology work package and the non-irradiated control in the genomic work package

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
blood sample to assess dosage of 5 proteins
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 years
Confirm the predictive value, of a blood test based on the dosage of a panel of five (5) proteins: AK2 - IDH2 - ANX1- APEX1 - HSC70 in radiation-induced late side effects after breast-conserving surgery and curative intent adjuvant radiotherapy.
through study completion, an average of 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: david azria, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 31, 2017

Study Completion

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 29, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 16, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 17, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 2, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 1, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ICM-URC-2014/22

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Blood sample

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings