Peptide GAM Immunoadsorption Therapy in Autoimmune Membranous Nephropathy (PRISM)

June 7, 2021 updated by: Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust

Phase II Trial Investigating the Safety and Feasibility of Peptide GAM Immunoadsorption in Anti-PLA2R Positive Autoimmune Membranous Nephropathy

Autoimmune Membranous Nephropathy is now understood to be a condition caused by the immune system although the exact mechanism is not completely known. This study aims to remove the offending part of the immune system using immunoadsorption to not only treat the disease but also use the opportunity to better understand the mechanism of disease. This will allow more targeted treatment in the future with less complications and side effects.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is among the most common causes of nephrotic syndrome in adults worldwide. The majority of patients will remain stable with either complete remission or partial remission but approximately 20% will progress slowly to end stage renal disease necessitating the need for renal replacement therapy (RRT).

Current standard therapy for primary (or autoimmune) membranous nephropathy is a regime of rotating high dose steroids and immunosuppression was first described in the mid-nineties and has been the mainstay of treatment since but comes with a high side effect burden.

Idiopathic membranous nephropathy is now understood to be an autoimmune disease characterised by the presence of IgG autoantibodies to M-Type Phospholipase A2 Receptor (anti-PLA2R). Immunoadsorption is a method of removing specific circulating immunoglobulins and has been shown to remove over 80% of circulating IgG with a single session immunoadsorption of 2.5 plasma volumes, with albumin and antithrombin III almost unaffected. With multiple sessions this can rise to over 98%.

Immunoadsorption therapy has been in use for a number of years and this study will use Peptide GAM Immunoadsorption therapy developed by Fresenius Healthcare. This uses two systems, the Art Universal and ADAsorb. The Art Universal became commercially available in 2005 and the ADAsorb in 2002.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
12

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
    • Greater Manchester
      • Manchester, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom, M13 9WL
        • Central Manchester University Hospital Foundation Trust
    • Lancashire
      • Preston, Lancashire, United Kingdom, PR2 9HT
        • Royal Preston Hospital
      • Salford, Lancashire, United Kingdom, M6 8HD
        • Salford Royal Infirmary

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Biopsy confirmed Primary Membranous Nephropathy within the last 3 years
  • Active disease despite 6 months of supportive care including ACEi or ARB (Active disease defined as uPCR > 300mg/mmol or 24 hour urinary protein >3.5g/1.73m2)
  • Disease severity that in the physicians view warrants treatment prior to completion of 6 months supportive care
  • Anti-PLA2R titre > 170 u/ml
  • Haemophilus and Pneumococcal vaccinations up to date
  • Above the age of 18
  • Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Evidence of causes of secondary membranous nephropathy
  • eGFR < 20ml/min
  • Treatment with steroids or immunosuppression (including but not limited to cyclophosphamide, MMF or azathioprine) and Biologics (including but limited to Rituximab or belimumab) within 6 months of screening
  • Therapeutic Plasma Exchange within 28 days of screening
  • Previous renal transplantation
  • Co-morbidity, which in physicians' view, would preclude patient from treatment with immunoadsorption.
  • Pregnant at time of screening

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Immunoadsorption therapy
Peptide GAM immunoadsorption therapy
Device: Immunoadsorption
Fresenius Globaffin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Serum anti-PLA2R titres
Time Frame: 14 days
Reduction in serum anti-PLA2R titres to normal range
14 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The incidence of treatment related adverse events as defined by CTCAE v4.0
Time Frame: Day 14, 28, 56, 84, 168 and 365
To assess the safety and tolerability of Immunoadosorption therapy
Day 14, 28, 56, 84, 168 and 365
To determine the effect on disease activity (efficacy)
Time Frame: Day 14, 28, 56, 84, 168 and 365
Assessment of reduction in proteinuria level and change in eGFR from baseline
Day 14, 28, 56, 84, 168 and 365
Serum anti-PLA2R titres
Time Frame: Day 14, 28, 56, 84, 168 and 365
Kinetic modelling of serum anti-PLA2R levels
Day 14, 28, 56, 84, 168 and 365
To determine the effect on Quality of life measures (EQ5D)
Time Frame: Day 14, 28, 56, 84, 168 and 365
To determine the effect on Quality of life measures (EQ5D)
Day 14, 28, 56, 84, 168 and 365
Cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: Day 14, 28, 56, 84, 168 and 365
Cost-effectiveness of treatment (Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio)
Day 14, 28, 56, 84, 168 and 365

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Fresenius AG

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sandip Mitra, Central Manchester University Hospital Foundation Trust

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 30, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 3, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 3, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 11, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 16, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 21, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 7, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • R04240

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Autoimmune Membranous Nephropathy

Clinical Trials on Immunoadsorption

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings