Effectiveness of Two Corticotomy Techniques in Retracting the Upper Anterior Teeth by Using Miniscrews
An Evaluation of the Efficacy of Conventional Corticotomy Versus Flapless Corticotomy in the En-Masse Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth : A Randomized Controlled Trial
This study aims to evaluate and compare the skeletal, dental and soft tissue changes, the levels of pain and discomfort and the effect on periodontal health and teeth vitality associated to traditional corticotomy and flapless corticotomy in the retraction of upper anterior teeth.
40 patients requiring extraction of maxillary first premolars and maximum anchorage to retract the upper anterior teeth will participate in the study. They will be divided randomly into two groups : flapless corticotomy (20 patients) and traditional corticotomy (20 patients). Pre-retraction, corticotomy will be performed in the maxillary anterior segment. The skeletal, dental and soft tissue changes will be performed using lateral cephalometric radiographs which will be obtained pretreatment, pre and post en-masse retraction of the anterior teeth and we will also use the dental casts to evaluate the dental changes.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
A corticotomy is cutting of the bone involves cortical bone only, leaving intact the medullary vessels and periosteum It offers an advantage to adult patients in reduction the orthodontic treatment time. The definition of traditional corticotomy is: elevating full-thickness periodontal flaps from a coronal approach, and vertical corticotomies are made between the teeth extending from 2-3 mm apical of the alveolar crest to 2 mm beyond the tooth apices and connected by a horizontal corticotomy; this process is done on both the labial and palatal aspects.
The definition of flapless corticotomy is: a minimally invasive version of corticotomy, using a piezotome in order to inflict bone injury. This technique entails labial and palatal interproximal piezoelectric microincisions into the cortical bone, without reflecting periodontal flaps.
Prior to enrollment of each subject into the study, they will be examined completely to determine the orthodontic treatment plan. The operator will inform them about the aim of the study and ask them to provide a written informed consent.
Self-drilling titanium mini-implants (1.6mm diameter and 8mm length) will be used. they will be inserted between the maxillary second premolar and first molar at approximately 8-10mm above the archwires at the mucogingival junction and will be checked for primary stability (mechanical retention). Then the maxillary first premolar will be extracted. The maxillary arch will be levelled and aligned. The rectangular stainless steel archwires (0.019" × 0.025") with anterior 8mm height soldered hooks distal to the lateral incisors will be inserted.
The surgery will be carried out under local anesthesia. The traditional corticotomy will be handled by the same maxillofacial surgeon and the flapless corticotomy will be handled by the same orthodontist.
For traditional corticotomy, sulcular incisions the mesial aspect of one second premolar to the mesial surface of the contralateral second premolar will be placed, and full thickness flap will be elevated, 3 mm above the apical region of the tooth. piezoelectric under copious irrigation will be used for making vertical and horizontal cuts (only cortical surface). The vertical cuts will be between the dental roots in the interdental cortical surfaces ,stopping 2 mm short of the alveolar crest, occlusally. Horizontal cut will connect the vertical cuts 2 mm beyond root apex. These cuts will be performed from the mesial aspect of one second premolar to the mesial surface of the contralateral second premolar involving the anteriors. Similarly, a palatal flap incision will be raised immediately for doing the same vertical and horizontal cuts in the superficial surface of the palatal bone.
For the flapless corticotomy, The depth of gingival tissue will be determined through bone sounding using a periodontal probe. A scalpel will be used to make the incisions through the gingiva, 4mm below the interdental papilla to preserve the coronal attached gingiva. These vertical incisions will be placed from the mesial aspect of one second premolar to the mesial surface of the contralateral second premolar on the labial and palatal aspects of the maxilla through the gingiva and the underlying bone. A piezosurgery knife will be used to create the cortical alveolar incisions to a depth of 1 mm within the cortical bone.
Postoperatively, all patients will be advised to rinse with chlorhexidine mouthwash twice a day for one week. All patients will be contacted the day after the procedure to ensure no complications with surgery and will be followed up one month post-surgery to assess for signs of infection and ensure normal healing. We will assess patients' acceptance and the levels of pain and discomfort of traditional corticotomy and flapless corticotomy by asking all patients to fill out 4 questionnaires during the first month after the surgical procedure using a VAS.
The surgical procedure will be performed and (250-300) g force will be applied on each side (3-4 days) after corticotomy using two NiTi springs attached between the mini-implants and the soldered hooks in a direction approximately parallel to the occlusal plane for conducting an en-masse retraction. The force level will be measured every 2 weeks after the corticotomy . Retraction will be stopped when a class I canine relationship will be achieved and a good incisor relationship will be obtained.
Periodontal health will be assessed at the beginning of orthodontic treatment, before and after corticotomy by evaluating the following parameters: plaque index, gingival index, bleeding index, and gingival recession.
Dental casts will be used for the quantification of the anteroposterior movement of the anterior teeth and the first molars every 30 days until class I canine relationship will be achieved and a good incisor relationship will be obtained.
To evaluate the movement of the anterior teeth: we will project the canine cusp on the median line and measure the distance from this point to the projected position of a distinct medial ruga point.
To evaluate the movement of the first molars: we will project the mesial contact point of the first molar on the median line and measure the distance from this point to the projected position of a distinct medial ruga point. These measurements will be made with sliding calipers.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic, DM20AM18
- Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients with permanent occlusion at age 18-30 years.
- Comprehensive medical and dental history ruling out any systemic disease
- Not under any systemic medication.
- No previous orthodontic treatment
- Patients with satisfactory periodontal health and Good oral hygiene
- Need to orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances
- No congenitally missing teeth except third molars in the maxillary arch
- Mild or no anterior crowding in maxillary arch.
- Maximum anchorage, with 75% to 100% of space closure of retraction of anterior segment in maxillary arch.
- Therapeutic extraction of maxillary first premolars required.
- Patients with class Ⅱ division 1 (ANB angle ≤7 degrees) with severe overjet (5-10 mm)
- Maximum retraction of the anterior teeth was desired.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with previous orthodontic treatment.
- Patients with severe skeletal dysplasia in all three dimensions.
- Patients suffer from systemic diseases or syndromes
- Patients on medication for systemic disorders, pregnancy or steroid therapy.
- Patients showing any signs of active periodontal disease
- Patients with severe crowding (≥ 3.5 mm) in maxillary arch
- Patients with missing or extracted teeth in maxillary arch except third molar.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Flapless corticotomy
Flapless corticotomy will be conducted in this group of patients.
|
Piezocision will be used to perform the procedure
|
|
Active Comparator: Traditional corticotomy
Traditional corticotomy will be performed in this group.
|
Here the surgery involves elevation of flaps and then conducting the surgical intervention using piezo-surgery cutting saws.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of retraction
Time Frame: The calculation of the rate of retraction will be done once the retraction procedures has finished. Completion of this procedure is expected to occur within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.
|
Assessment will be performed on study models.
The amount of distance being retracted in millimeters will be divided by the duration of retraction in weeks to give an estimation of the retraction rate.
|
The calculation of the rate of retraction will be done once the retraction procedures has finished. Completion of this procedure is expected to occur within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.
|
|
Change in Incisors' positions
Time Frame: T0: 1 day before the beginning of retraction. T1: after 1 month (m) of retraction. T2: after 2 m of retraction. T3: after 3 m. T4: after 4 m. T5: at the end of retraction (expected to be within 6 m in the exp. group and 8 m in the control group)
|
Amount of distance being traveled by the retracted anterior teeth is going to be measured on study models taken at monthly intervals until the end of the retraction phase.
|
T0: 1 day before the beginning of retraction. T1: after 1 month (m) of retraction. T2: after 2 m of retraction. T3: after 3 m. T4: after 4 m. T5: at the end of retraction (expected to be within 6 m in the exp. group and 8 m in the control group)
|
|
Change in Molars' positions
Time Frame: T0: 1 day before the beginning of retraction. T1: after 1 month (m) of retraction. T2: after 2 m of retraction. T3: after 3 m. T4: after 4 m. T5: at the end of retraction (expected to be within 6 m in the exp. group and 8 m in the control group)
|
Amount of distance being traveled by the first molars and is going to be measured on study models taken at monthly intervals until the end of the retraction phase.
|
T0: 1 day before the beginning of retraction. T1: after 1 month (m) of retraction. T2: after 2 m of retraction. T3: after 3 m. T4: after 4 m. T5: at the end of retraction (expected to be within 6 m in the exp. group and 8 m in the control group)
|
|
Duration of en-masse retraction of anterior teeth
Time Frame: The months required to compete the retraction procedure will be recorded. Completion of this procedure is expected to be occur within six months in the experimental group and eight months in the control group.
|
Assessment will be performed by calculating the months required to achieve complete retraction of the upper anterior teeth (six teeth) through clinical examination.
|
The months required to compete the retraction procedure will be recorded. Completion of this procedure is expected to be occur within six months in the experimental group and eight months in the control group.
|
|
Change in the SNA angle
Time Frame: The cephalogram will be taken twice, 1 week before the commencement of the retraction and at the completion of retraction. Completion of this procedure is expected to be done within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.
|
This angle the represents the position of the upper jaw in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction.
Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this angle is going to be measured in degrees.
|
The cephalogram will be taken twice, 1 week before the commencement of the retraction and at the completion of retraction. Completion of this procedure is expected to be done within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.
|
|
Change in the SNB angle
Time Frame: The cephalogram will be taken twice, 1 week before the commencement of the retraction and at the completion of retraction. Completion of this procedure is expected to be done within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.
|
This angle the represents the position of the lower jaw in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction.
Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this angle is going to be measured in degrees.
|
The cephalogram will be taken twice, 1 week before the commencement of the retraction and at the completion of retraction. Completion of this procedure is expected to be done within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.
|
|
Change in the ANB angle
Time Frame: The cephalogram will be taken twice, 1 week before the commencement of the retraction and at the completion of retraction. Completion of this procedure is expected to be done within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.
|
This angle the represents the spatial relationship between the upper and lower jaws in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction.
Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this angle is going to be measured in degrees.
|
The cephalogram will be taken twice, 1 week before the commencement of the retraction and at the completion of retraction. Completion of this procedure is expected to be done within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.
|
|
Change in the SN.GoMe angle
Time Frame: The cephalogram will be taken twice, 1 week before the commencement of the retraction and at the completion of retraction. Completion of this procedure is expected to be done within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.
|
This angle the represents the amount of backward rotation of the lower jaw in the cephalometric analysis.
Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this angle is going to be measured in degrees.
|
The cephalogram will be taken twice, 1 week before the commencement of the retraction and at the completion of retraction. Completion of this procedure is expected to be done within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.
|
|
Change in the MM angle
Time Frame: The cephalogram will be taken twice, 1 week before the commencement of the retraction and at the completion of retraction. Completion of this procedure is expected to be done within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.
|
This angle the represents the amount of vertical divergence between the upper and lower jaws in the cephalometric analysis.
Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this angle is going to be measured in degrees.
|
The cephalogram will be taken twice, 1 week before the commencement of the retraction and at the completion of retraction. Completion of this procedure is expected to be done within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in the levels of pain and discomfort
Time Frame: Levels of pain will be assessed at : 24 hours following the surgical intervention (T1), one week (T2) , two weeks (T3) and four weeks (T4) following the surgical intervention
|
Assessment will be performed using questionnaires via visual analog scales (VAS)
|
Levels of pain will be assessed at : 24 hours following the surgical intervention (T1), one week (T2) , two weeks (T3) and four weeks (T4) following the surgical intervention
|
|
Change in the Plaque index
Time Frame: This will be measured: one day before the commencement of the retraction phase and at the end of the retraction phase which is expected to occur within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.
|
The plaque index will be used to assess the status of the oral hygiene in these patients.
|
This will be measured: one day before the commencement of the retraction phase and at the end of the retraction phase which is expected to occur within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.
|
|
Change in the Gingival index
Time Frame: This will be measured: one day before the commencement of the retraction phase and at the end of the retraction phase which is expected to occur within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.
|
The Gingival index will be used to assess the status of the gingival tissues around the teeth.
|
This will be measured: one day before the commencement of the retraction phase and at the end of the retraction phase which is expected to occur within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.
|
|
Change in the Bleeding index
Time Frame: This will be measured: one day before the commencement of the retraction phase and at the end of the retraction phase which is expected to occur within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.
|
The plaque index will be used to assess the status of periodontal tissues and the amount of congestion in the gingival margins around the anterior teeth.
|
This will be measured: one day before the commencement of the retraction phase and at the end of the retraction phase which is expected to occur within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.
|
|
Gingival Recession
Time Frame: Two measurements are required for this calculation: one day before the commencement of the retraction phase and at the end of the retraction phase which is expected to occur within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.
|
This will be measured in millimeters from the cement-enamel junction to the level of the gingival margin around the six anterior teeth.
|
Two measurements are required for this calculation: one day before the commencement of the retraction phase and at the end of the retraction phase which is expected to occur within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.
|
|
Change in Tooth Vitality
Time Frame: This will be measured: one day before the commencement of the retraction phase and at the end of the retraction phase which is expected to occur within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.
|
Tooth vitality will be evaluated for each tooth of the six anterior teeth using Ethyl Chloride applied by a cotton roll.
|
This will be measured: one day before the commencement of the retraction phase and at the end of the retraction phase which is expected to occur within 6 months in the experimental group and 8 months in the control group.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Hanin Nizar Khlef, DDS, MSc student, Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Syria
- Study Director: Mohammad Y Hajeer, DDS MSc Phd, Associate Professor of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Syria
- Study Director: Omar Hashmeh, DDS MSc PhD, Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Damascus Dental School, Syria
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Al-Sibaie S, Hajeer MY. Assessment of changes following en-masse retraction with mini-implants anchorage compared to two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2014 Jun;36(3):275-83. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjt046. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
- Jee JH, Ahn HW, Seo KW, Kim SH, Kook YA, Chung KR, Nelson G. En-masse retraction with a preformed nickel-titanium and stainless steel archwire assembly and temporary skeletal anchorage devices without posterior bonding. Korean J Orthod. 2014 Sep;44(5):236-45. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2014.44.5.236. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
- Lee J, Miyazawa K, Tabuchi M, Sato T, Kawaguchi M, Goto S. Effectiveness of en-masse retraction using midpalatal miniscrews and a modified transpalatal arch: Treatment duration and dentoskeletal changes. Korean J Orthod. 2014 Mar;44(2):88-95. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2014.44.2.88. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
- Seo KW, Kwon SY, Kim KA, Park KH, Kim SH, Ahn HW, Nelson G. Displacement pattern of the anterior segment using antero-posterior lingual retractor combined with a palatal plate. Korean J Orthod. 2015 Nov;45(6):289-98. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2015.45.6.289. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
- Krishnan P, Shetty S, Husain A. An adjunctive minor surgical procedure for increased rate of retraction. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2013 Jun;5(Suppl 1):S39-42. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.113293.
- Sakthi SV, Vikraman B, Shobana VR, Iyer SK, Krishnaswamy NR. Corticotomy-assisted retraction: an outcome assessment. Indian J Dent Res. 2014 Nov-Dec;25(6):748-54. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.152191.
- Bhattacharya P, Bhattacharya H, Anjum A, Bhandari R, Agarwal DK, Gupta A, Ansar J. Assessment of Corticotomy Facilitated Tooth Movement and Changes in Alveolar Bone Thickness - A CT Scan Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Oct;8(10):ZC26-30. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/9448.4954. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
- Chung KR, Mitsugi M, Lee BS, Kanno T, Lee W, Kim SH. Speedy surgical orthodontic treatment with skeletal anchorage in adults--sagittal correction and open bite correction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Oct;67(10):2130-48. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.002.
- Khlef HN, Hajeer MY, Ajaj MA, Heshmeh O, Youssef N, Mahaini L. The effectiveness of traditional corticotomy vs flapless corticotomy in miniscrew-supported en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion: A single-centered, randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 Dec;158(6):e111-e120. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.08.008. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- UDDS-Ortho-04-2017
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Class II Div 1 Malocclusion
-
NCT07162753RecruitingClass II Div 1 Malocclusion | Class III Malocclusion | Class II Division 2 Malocclusion | Class I Malocclusion
-
NCT05639725RecruitingClass II Div 1 Malocclusion
-
NCT04202016Completed
-
NCT07404696Not yet recruitingClass II Malocclusion | Class II Malocclusion, Division 1 | Overjet
-
NCT07405905Recruiting
-
NCT07243509CompletedCLASS II DIVISION 1 MALOCCLUSION
-
NCT04743700UnknownAngle Class II, Division 1 Malocclusion
-
NCT07466641RecruitingBimaxillary Protrusion | Malocclusion, Angle Class II, Division 1 | Class I Malocclusion
-
NCT06609733CompletedCLASS II DIVISION 1 MALOCCLUSION
-
NCT06631131CompletedClass II Malocclusion | Class II Malocclusion, Division 1
Clinical Trials on Flapless corticotomy surgical intervention will be conducted
-
NCT06351618RecruitingFemale | Sport Injury | Female Athlete Triad | Sports Accident | Ice-Skates Accident
-
NCT05321004Completed
-
NCT07480122Not yet recruitingStroke | Quality of Life | Neglect, Hemispatial | Upper Extremity Function | Motor ımargery | Daily Life Activity
-
NCT07294378CompletedImpaction of Tooth
-
NCT07431996Not yet recruiting
-
NCT04320732Recruiting
-
NCT00914030UnknownSchizophrenia | Autism Spectrum Disorders
-
NCT07040033RecruitingDisease Management | Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD) | NURSİNG | LIFE SATISFACTION
-
NCT06632821Not yet recruiting