Barriers and Facilitators of Key Stakeholders to Implement Remote Monitoring Technologies: a Mixed-methods Analysis

April 8, 2024 updated by: Imperial College London

Barriers and Facilitators of Key Stakeholders in Implementing Remote Monitoring Technologies: a Mixed-methods Analysis

Advancements in digital technologies alongside the global pandemic of COVID-19 have accelerated the adoption of novel healthcare pathways worldwide, with healthcare delivery transitioning beyond the traditional face-to-face model. Telemedicine has gained long over- due exposure during a complicated crisis; as the number of cases continue to grow with second waves predicted, digital modalities have become critical in moderating exposure risk to healthcare staff, reducing community spread, and delivering quality healthcare remotely for exposed or infected individuals.

Remote monitoring solutions are being established internationally to allow individuals to continue living at home rather than in expensive hospital facilities using non-invasive digital technologies (such as wearable sensors) to collect health data, support health provider assessment and clinical decision making.

With the advances in technology miniaturisation, sensors have become increasingly portable, unobtrusive, lightweight, and waterproof, offering an emerging solution to continuous remote monitoring of vital signs. It is predicated that continuous monitoring allows for early recognition of clinical deterioration, and through digital alerting, offers an opportunity for earlier clinical intervention, improving patient care and patient outcomes.

Within the United Kingdom (UK), widespread digital transformations are facilitated by NHS digital, a non-departmental public body created by statute, delivering large health informatics programmes. As such, this study aims to investigate key stakeholder perspectives on an organisational level of implementing remote monitoring solutions, given the pandemic, in the National Health Service (NHS), identifying factors that could affect successful execution and adoption.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Previous experience in implementing remote monitoring solutions

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A mixed methods approach will be implemented: semi-structured interviews will be conducted with high level stake holders from industry, academia, and healthcare providers who have played an instrumental role with prior experience of implementing digital solutions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not able to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Validated TAM (technology acceptance model) questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 year
Liberty scale questionnaire responses
1 year
Thematic analysis
Time Frame: 1 year
Semi structured interviews using a predetermined topic guide on questions relating to barriers and facilitators
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Imperial College London

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 29, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20IC6331

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COVID-19

Clinical Trials on Semi-structured interviews will be conducted - there will be no intervention.

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Kenya

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe