Comparison Between Neuro 1 and Neuro 2 Cochlear Implant Speech Processors

March 22, 2023 updated by: Oticon Medical

Comparison of Patient Satisfaction and Audiological Performance Between Neuro 1 and Neuro 2 Speech Processors

The present study aims to evaluate patient satisfaction and audiological performance with their current cochlear implant speech processor, the Neuro 1, and to compare it with the satisfaction and performance obtained with the new speech processor, the Neuro 2.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Nowadays, cochlear implants (CI) are successfully used to rehabilitate severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss. Oticon Medical recently developed a new cochlear implant system, including a new implantable internal part (Neuro Zti) and a new speech processor (Neuro 1). This new speech processor automatically detects and adapts to the sound environment, increasing the ease of listening in all situations. A second version of this speech processor has very recently been developed, called the Neuro 2. The Neuro 1 and 2 share the same signal processing characteristics and the "sound" delivered to the patient is similar. However, the Neuro 2 offers better ergonomics (smaller size and weight, rechargeable batteries…). Some improvements available on the Neuro 2 may be particularly interesting for children.

The aim of the present study is twofold: 1. Compare the satisfaction of adult and pediatric users for the speech processor Neuro 1 with their satisfaction for the Neuro 2, and 2. Show that audiological outcomes are at least as good for the Neuro 2 than for the Neuro 1.

The participants come at the hospital for three visits. The Neuro 1 is evaluated during the first visit (V1). Evaluation of the Neuro 2 takes place during the second (V2, 15 days after V1) and the third (V3, 3 months after V2).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
98

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Bordeaux, France, 33000
        • Hôpital Pellegrin
      • Lille, France, 59037
        • Hôpital Roger Salengro
      • Lyon, France, 69003
        • Hopital Edouard Herriot
      • Nancy, France, 54035
        • CHRU de Nancy Hôpital Central
      • Nantes, France, 44093
        • CHU de Nantes Hôtel-Dieu
      • Nice, France, 06200
        • Hôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice CHU-Lenval
      • Nice, France, 06103
        • CHU Nice - Institut Universitaire de la Face et du Cou
      • Paris, France, 75015
        • Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades
      • Paris, France, 75013
        • Hôpital Pitié Salpétrière - APHP

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • informed consent
  • Native French speaker or fluent French speaker
  • Patient already fitted with one or two speech processor Neuro 1 for at least 5 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • vulnerable patients, at the exception of children (pregnant women, persons under guardianship)
  • No Social security affiliation
  • non-compliant patient

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Adults and children above 14 years old

Visit 1:

Satisfaction questionnaire on Neuro 1 Speech intelligibility in quiet on Neuro 1 Speech intelligibility in noise on Neuro 1 VRB (Vocale Rapide dans le Bruit) on Neuro 1

Visit 2 (15 days after V1):

Satisfaction questionnaire on Neuro 2 Speech audiometry in quiet on Neuro 2 Speech audiometry in noise on Neuro 2 VRB (Vocale Rapide dans le Bruit) on Neuro 2

Visit 3 (3 months after V2):

Satisfaction questionnaire on Neuro 2 Speech audiometry in quiet on Neuro 2 Speech audiometry in noise on Neuro 2 VRB (Vocale Rapide dans le Bruit) on Neuro 2
Other: Satisfaction questionnaire
Participants have to complete a satisfaction questionnaire on the Neuro 1 or 2 processor.
Behavioral: Speech intelligibility in quiet
The speech material corresponds to the lists of Lafon designed for cochlear implant patients. Each lists contains 17 monosyllabic words. Speech comprehension is evaluated by the percentage of correct words and the percentage of correct phonemes. Speech signals are presented at 65 dB SPL. 2 lists of 17 words are presented. At visit 1, the participants wear the sound processor Neuro 1. At visits 2 and 3, the participants wear the Neuro 2.
Behavioral: Speech intelligibility in noise
The speech material corresponds to the lists of Lafon designed for cochlear implant patients. Each lists contains 17 monosyllabic words. Speech comprehension is evaluated by the percentage of correct words and the percentage of correct phonemes. Speech signals are presented at 65 dB SPL. 2 lists of 17 words are presented. The noise corresponds to a cocktail party presented at +10 dB SNR (Speech on Noise Ratio). At visit 1, the participants wear the sound processor Neuro 1. At visits 2 and 3, the participants wear the Neuro 2.
Behavioral: VRB (Vocale Rapide dans le Bruit)
Speech intelligibility in noise measured with the test VRB (Vocale Rapide dans le Bruit, French version of the Quick Sin). This test measures the SNR (Signal to Noise Ratio) at which the listeners understand half of the words of a sentence correctly. The outcome measure is in dB. 3 lists are presented. Speech signals are presented at 60 dB SPL.
Other Names:
  • french Quick SIN
Experimental: children up to 14 years old

Visit 1 Satisfaction questionnaire on Neuro 1

Visit 2 (15 days after V1):

Satisfaction questionnaire on Neuro 2

Visit 3 (3 months after V2):

Satisfaction questionnaire on Neuro 2

The questionnaires have to be filled in by the parents. The child can participate in the completion of the questionnaire if he is willing and understands the questions.
Other: Satisfaction questionnaire
Participants have to complete a satisfaction questionnaire on the Neuro 1 or 2 processor.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Satisfaction questionnaire
Time Frame: 15 minutes
The listener has to rate his appreciation of the Neuro 1 and Neuro 2 device and the sound quality on 7 points scale. The outcome measure corresponds to averaged score. The questionnaire has been developed by Oticon Medical to investigate satisfaction patient for their current and future speech processors. This questionnaire is not validated in the literature.
15 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Speech comprehension in quiet
Time Frame: 15 mins
The speech material corresponds to the lists of Lafon designed for cochlear implant patients. Each lists contains 17 monosyllabic words. Speech comprehension is evaluated by the percentage of words and the percentage of phonemes correctly repeated. This double scoring is used to avoid floor or ceiling effects that could happen with only one of these measures.
15 mins
Speech comprehension in Noise
Time Frame: 15 mins
The speech material corresponds to the lists of Lafon designed for cochlear implant patients. Each lists contains 17 monosyllabic words. Speech comprehension is evaluated by the percentage of words and the percentage of phonemes correctly repeated. This double scoring is used to avoid floor or ceiling effects that could happen with only one of these measures.
15 mins
French Quick Sin
Time Frame: 5 mins
This test measures the SNR (Signal to Noise Ratio) at which the listeners understand half of the words of a sentence correctly. The outcome measure is in dB.
5 mins

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Oticon Medical

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Christophe Vincent, MD, PROF, Hôpital Roger Salengro CHRU de Lille

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 2, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 11, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 11, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 18, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 18, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 20, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 22, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PIC_14

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Clinical Trials on Satisfaction questionnaire

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings