Implementation of a Web-based Decision Aid for Breast Cancer Surgery

May 23, 2021 updated by: University of Wisconsin, Madison

Implementation of a Web-based Decision Aid for Breast Cancer Surgery: Adapting to the Needs of Diverse Settings

Routine incorporation of decision aids into oncology practice has the potential to significantly improve patients' experiences with cancer by increasing the likelihood that they make informed treatment decisions aligned with their values. Unfortunately, only a minority of the more than 1.6 million patients diagnosed annually with cancer ever receive one due to limited clinic resources for administration and challenges in timely identification of appropriate patients. Online delivery directly to patients addresses some of these barriers but is insufficient on its own to ensure accessibility for patients at the time they most benefit from support.19 It is critical that active, multi-faceted implementation strategies that target barriers to the widespread use of web-based decision aids be identified, as these tools have the potential to significantly improve the quality of oncologic care.

Based on strong preliminary work, the investigators have developed and piloted a package of implementation strategies that effectively overcomes barriers to delivery of a web-based breast cancer surgery decision aid in an academic and community clinic. Although the strategy was successful, patients were white and educated; further investigation is imperative in settings that provide care to underserved patients to ensure the intervention will mitigate, rather than worsen, existing disparities in breast cancer care. This is especially critical given that underserved patients may benefit most from shared decision-making interventions such as the one described. To study this, the investigators propose a pilot study within a clinic that serves a catchment area with a high proportion of African American, rural and low income patients. The investigators will iteratively assess and enhance our implementation package using concepts outlined in the Knowledge-to-Action Cycle, which emphasizes local context in balancing fidelity and flexibility. The specific aims are: 1) To identify patient and clinic level barriers to implementation of a web-based breast cancer surgery decision aid in a clinic that cares for underserved patients, and 2) To test and expand our current implementation package's ability to address barriers in a clinic that cares for underserved patients. The investigators will determine the reach of implementation and acceptability of this method of decision aid delivery to stakeholders.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

11

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38120
        • Baptist Health System
    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53705
        • University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 96 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This is a clinic-level intervention with two stakeholder groups: (1) clinical staff, clinic leadership, and surgeons involved in implementation, and (2) patients newly diagnosed with Stage 0-3 breast cancer.

Description

Patients:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients newly diagnosed with Stage 0-3 breast cancer.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Clinic Stakeholders:

Inclusion Criteria: clinical staff, clinic leadership, and surgeons involved in implementation Exclusion Criteria: none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reach: Proportion of Participants who Utilize the Decision Aid
Time Frame: measured over the 4 month implementation period
Reach of the implementation is defined as the proportion of participants over the four month implementation period who: 1) are sent the decision aid and 2) access the decision aid.
measured over the 4 month implementation period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability: Percentage of Participants Who Would Recommend Receiving Breast Cancer Information Via Email
Time Frame: Survey sent within 4 weeks of surgical consultation
acceptability will be defined as >80% of patients reporting they would recommend receiving breast cancer information via email to others.
Survey sent within 4 weeks of surgical consultation
Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation of the Decision Aid
Time Frame: Interviewed completed within 6 months of the surgical consultation
One-on-one interviews with participants to identify those who experienced barriers and facilitators to implementing the decision aid
Interviewed completed within 6 months of the surgical consultation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Heather Neuman, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 4, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 12, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

May 12, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 27, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 2, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

October 6, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 25, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2017-0588
  • A539740 (OTHER: UW Madison)
  • SMPH\SURGERY\GEN SURG (OTHER: UW Madison)
  • 5P30CA014520-43 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • UW16147 (Other Identifier: UWCCC)
  • Protocol Version 3/15/2019 (Other Identifier: UW Madison)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer Surgery Decision Aid

Search Similar Trials