Spleen-ARFI-assisted-Portal-Hypertension-Evaluation-Study (SAPHES) (SAPHES)

October 16, 2017 updated by: Thomas Seufferlein, University of Ulm

Prospective Evaluation of Non-invasive ARFI-elastography of Liver and Spleen and Portal Flow Measurement in Comparison With Invasive HVPG (Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient)-Measurement for Patients With Portal Hypertension.

This study evaluates correlation in changes of HVPG-pressure values and stiffness values (ARFI) for spleen and liver and flow-volume values in Portal vein in patients with liver cirrhosis/Portal Hypertension, respectively, after new-admission of beta-blocker therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Portal Hypertension is the most important risk factor for development of liver cirrhosis-linked complications (e.g. ascites, variceal bleeding, hepatocellular carcinoma, etc.). The invasive HVPG-technique is the standard-of-care Investigation for Evaluation of Portal Hypertension. Administration of Beta-Blocker-therapy results in dropping of the elevated Portal vein pressure values so Overall-survival rate and incidence of liver-cirrhosis-linked complications can be ameliorated. Ultrasound-based Investigation of liver and Spleen-stiffness and of portal-vein-flow-volume, respectively, are the non-invasive methods for Evaluation of Portal Hypertension. But the cut-off values for detection of significant Portal Hypertension by the ultrasound investigation strongly vary depending on the study performed. This study evaluates the changes in ARFI-assisted elastography measurements of liver and spleen and in portal vein flow values, respectively, compared with the recorded Delta in invasive hepatic vein pressure gradient (HVPG)-values for patients with portal hypertension and new administered beta-blocker-therapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate value drop in liver- and Spleen-stiffness and portal-vein-flow required in corelation to a significant drop in HVPG-pressure after new-administered beta-blocker therapy.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
45

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • liver cirrhosis
  • portal hypertension
  • indication to beta-blocker-therapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • contraindication to beta-blocker-therapy
  • HVPG-measurement not feasible
  • portal vein thrombosis
  • hematologic underlying disease as the source for enlarged/stiff spleen or liver

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
OTHER: cirrhosis patients

ARFI-elastography and portal vein flow measurement: Liver and spleen of patients with a scheduled HVPG-investigation will be examined by an ARFI-elastography-investigation. Additionally the portal vein flow will be assessed.

This examination will be done at d0 before the start of beta-blocker-administration and repeated as monitoring for portal hypertension treated by beta-blocker after 6 and 12 weeks, respectively.

HVPG-measurement: HVPG-values will be assessed at d0, after 6 and after 12 Weeks, respectively.
Diagnostic test: ARFI-elastography and portal vein flow measurement
Liver and spleen-elastography assessed by ARFI-technique and the portal vein flow value-assessment by ultrasound investigation.
Diagnostic test: HVPG-measurement
Evaluation of Portal Hypertension by HVPG-measurement

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in ARFI-elastography value for spleen due to beta-blocker therapy
Time Frame: 6 and 12 weeks
ARFI-elastography: measured in m/s
6 and 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation between changes in HVPG-values and ARFI-elastography values for liver
Time Frame: 6 and 12 weeks
HVPG-values: measured in mmHg; ARFI-elastography: measured in m/s
6 and 12 weeks
Correlation between changes in HVPG-values and ARFI-elastography values for spleen
Time Frame: 6 and 12 weeks
HVPG-values: measured in mmHg; ARFI-elastography: measured in m/s
6 and 12 weeks
Correlation between changes in HVPG-values and portal vein flow measurements
Time Frame: 6 and 12 weeks
HVPG-values: measured in mmHg; Portal vein flow: measured in cm/s
6 and 12 weeks
Correlation between changes in grade of esophageal varices and HVPG-values
Time Frame: 12 weeks
esophageal varices: modified Poquet classification; HVPG-values: measured in mmHg
12 weeks
Correlation between changes in grade of esophageal varices and ARFI-values for liver
Time Frame: 12 weeks
esophageal varices: modified Poquet classification; ARFI-elastography: measured in m/s
12 weeks
Correlation between changes in grade of esophageal varices and ARFI-values for spleen
Time Frame: 12 weeks
esophageal varices: modified Poquet classification; ARFI-elastography: measured in m/s
12 weeks
Correlation between changes in grade of esophageal varices and Portal vein flow
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Portal vein flow: measured in cm/s; esophageal varices: modified Poquet classification
12 weeks
Change in ARFI-elastography value for liver due to beta-blocker therapy
Time Frame: 6 and 12 weeks
ARFI-elastography: measured in m/s
6 and 12 weeks
Change in portal vein flow value due to beta-blocker therapy
Time Frame: 6 and 12 weeks
Portal vein flow: measured in cm/s
6 and 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Ulm

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Eugen Zizer, MD, University of Ulm

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 10, 2017

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2018

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 16, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 16, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 20, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 20, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 16, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SAPHES

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertension, Portal

Clinical Trials on ARFI-elastography and portal vein flow measurement

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings