Right Ventricular and Pulmonary Artery Evaluation by CMR

December 14, 2017 updated by: Egle Ereminiene, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences

Right Ventricular Geometry, Function, Morphology and Pulmonary Arterial Stiffness and Size Evaluation by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance

Pulmonary hypertension results in right ventricle dysfunction. Cardiac magnetic resonance derived RV ejection fraction is a prognostic value in this condition.

Right ventricular geometry, function, morphology as well as pulmonary arterial stiffness and size may be evaluated by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and could have great importance in evaluation of pulmonary hypertension prognosis and outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Pulmonary hypertension is defined as an increase in mean pulmonary artery pressure > 25 mmHg evaluated by right heart catheterisation. Over time increased pulmonary artery pressure eventually causes vascular remodelling and right ventricular dysfunction. The right and left ventricles interact sharing a common pericardial sac and interventricular septum. Frequently right ventricle dysfunction reflects clinical PH worsening.

The aim of this study was to assess the geometry, function and morphology of right ventricle and also pulmonary artery diameter and stiffness in pulmonary hypertension patients by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Patients are recruited from the Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas clinics Pulmonary hypertension center.

Study inclusion criteria:

  1. Patient with diagnosed pulmonary hypertension
  2. RHC, 6MWT, echocardiography, NT-pro BNP, CMR performed in one month period.
  3. Patients who signed study informed consent form.

Study exclusion criteria:

  1. Coronary and valvular heart disease
  2. Atrial fibrillation
  3. Expressed shortness of breath
  4. Claustrophobia.

Suspected number of participants - 100.

Data Analysis Statistical analyses will be performed using SPSS 22.0 package (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous variables will be expressed as mean +/- standard deviation, skewed variables as median (interquartile range). Chi square test will be used for qualitative parameters. For continuous variables, differences between two groups will be compared using non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. Relation between variables will be assessed using Spearman correlation coefficient. Univariate analysis of predictors for survival will be used. In order to assess minimally false negative and minimally false positive results with greatest accuracy, the method of ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristics) curve will be used. The optimal values will be separated out the different groups (survival/non-survival) with the highest accuracy (minimal false negative and false positive). Survival curves will be established by the Kaplan-Meier estimation method. Cox regression analysis will be used to identify independent predictor of outcomes. Two-tailed probability values at p<0,05 will be considered statistically significant.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Precapillary pulmonary hypertesnion patients

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient with diagnosed pulmonary hypertension
  2. RHC, 6MWT, echocardiography, NT-pro BNP, CMR performed in one month period.
  3. Patients who signed study informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Coronary and valvular heart disease
  2. Atrial fibrillation
  3. Expressed shortness of breath
  4. Claustrophobia.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Right ventricle function and morphological changes in pulmonary hypertension patients during follow up
Time Frame: 2 years
Right ventricle function will be evaluated by CMR at base line and during follow up to find significant values for disease progression and prognosis
2 years
Right ventricle function and morphological changes in pulmonary hypertension patients during follow up
Time Frame: 2 years
Pulmonary artery will be evaluated by CMR at base line and during follow up to find significant values for disease progression and prognosis
2 years
Left ventricle function and mechanical changes in pulmonary hypertension patients during follow up
Time Frame: 2 years
Left ventricle function and mechanical changes will be evaluated by CMR and FT at base line and during follow up to find significant values for disease progression and prognosis
2 years
Right ventricle mechanical changes in pulmonary hypertension patients during follow up
Time Frame: 2 years
Right ventricle function and mechanical changes will be evaluated by FT at base line and during follow up to find significant values for disease progression and prognosis
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Lina Padervinskiene, PhD, LSMU

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 6, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 14, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 19, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 19, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 14, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • no. BE-2-23

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Hypertension

Clinical Trials on CMR

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings