Natural History Study of CEP290-Related Retinal Degeneration

May 18, 2022 updated by: Editas Medicine, Inc.
A prospective natural history study with systematic assessments and uniform follow-up to provide a high-quality dataset for assisting in the design of future clinical treatment trials involving patients with CEP290-related retinal degeneration caused by the common intron 26 mutation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

The purpose of the study is to describe the natural history of CEP290-related retinal degeneration caused by a compound heterozygous or homozygous intron 26 c.2991+1655A>G mutation and to better understand the best assessments for evaluation of patients with this condition in a future interventional trial. Patients meeting the entry criteria will be enrolled in the study. Visits will occur at Screening, Baseline, and Months 3, 6, and 12, for a total duration of 1 year.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
26

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Paris, France, 75252
        • Universite Pierre et Marie Curie
  • Germany
      • Giessen, Germany, 35392
        • Universitaetsklinikum Giessen and Marburg GmbH
  • Netherlands
    • Gelderland
      • Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6525
        • Radboud Universitair Medisch Centrum
  • United States
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • Bascom Palmer Eye Institute
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48105
        • W.K. Kellogg Eye Center
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Casey Eye Institute - OHSU

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

10 months to 95 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The indication for this study is CEP290-related retinal degeneration caused by a compound heterozygous or homozygous intron 26 c.2991+1655A>G mutation.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient and/or parent/legal guardian must complete/sign an informed consent form (ICF). If required on a per patient basis, provisions can be made for alternative forms of consent (eg, witnessed consent). Where required by the IRB/IEC, minors must also verbalize or sign a confirmation of assent.
  • At least 3 years of age at screening.
  • Has abnormally decreased vision, defined as having light perception to 20/50 visual acuity in each eye, with examination and test results consistent with an inherited retinal degeneration due to mutations in the CEP290 gene.
  • Has CEP290-related retinal degeneration caused by a compound heterozygous or homozygous intron 26 c.2991+1655A>G mutation (ie, 1 or 2 copies of the intron 26 c.2991+1655A>G mutation) confirmed by deoxyribonucleic acid sequencing.
  • Has ability to cooperate with assessments relative to age.
  • Has clear ocular media and adequate pupil dilation in at least 1 eye, to permit good quality fundus examination and optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has history or current evidence of a medical condition (systemic or ophthalmic disease, metabolic dysfunction, physical examination finding, or clinical laboratory finding) that may, in the opinion of the Investigator, preclude adherence to the scheduled study visits, safe participation in the study, or affect the results of the study (eg, uncontrolled systemic hypertension, autoimmune disease, advanced coronary artery disease, or cerebral vascular disease, other unstable or progressive cardiovascular, pulmonary, Parkinson's, liver or renal disease, cancer, or dementia).
  • Has history or current evidence of ocular disease in either eye that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may confound assessment of this inherited retinal disease or the assessments utilized herein (eg, glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, uveitis, or the presence of any condition that precludes adequate visualization of the fundus such as dense cataracts or corneal scarring).
  • Achieves a passing score for the Visual Function Navigation Test at the maximum level of difficulty (ie, passes the most challenging Visual Function Navigation Test under the dimmest lighting conditions) with each eye independently and both eyes together.
  • Is currently receiving gene therapy and/or has received gene therapy.
  • Is currently enrolled in an investigational or interventional drug or device study and/or has participated in such a study within 30 days of Screening.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Group 1
5 Patient target, ages 3 to 5 yr, with visual acuity Light Perception (LP) to <=20/200
Group 2
5 Patient target, ages 3 to 5 yr, with visual acuity >20/200 to <=20/50
Group 3
5 Patient target, ages 6 to 11 yr, with visual acuity LP to <=20/200
Group 4
5 Patient target, ages 6 to 11 yr, with visual acuity >20/200 to <=20/50
Group 5
5 Patient target, ages 12 to 17 yr, with visual acuity LP to <=20/200
Group 6
5 Patient target, ages 12 to 17 yr, with visual acuity >20/200 to <=20/50
Group 7
5 Patient target, ages 18yr and older, with visual acuity LP to <=20/200
Group 8
5 Patient target, ages 18yr and older, with visual acuity >20/200 to <=20/50

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Characterize CEP290-related retinal degeneration
Time Frame: Through 12 months
To prospectively characterize CEP290-related retinal degeneration and the clinical phenotype of patients with either compound heterozygous or homozygous intron 26 c.2991+1655A>G mutations
Through 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Editas Medicine, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 17, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 6, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 6, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 4, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 4, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 10, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 19, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 18, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • EDIT-NHS01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings