3D Ultrasound-guided Labor Epidural Analgesia in the Morbid Obese Parturient

3D Ultrasound-guided Labor Epidural Analgesia in the Morbid Obese Parturient: A Randomized Control Trial

This study will be a randomized control study, with the objective to evaluate epidural analgesia success rates between the two methods (Blind Approach versus Accuro Device).

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Worldwide obesity has become an epidemic. The obstetrical population is no exception. This made more challenging for anesthesiologists on labor and delivery units to administer epidural analgesia. According to the World Health Organization, more than 30% of U.S. adults are obese with a body mass index (BMI; in kg/m2) ≥ 30. Recent data has shown that increased BMI has been associated with increased neuraxial analgesic failure and difficulty with prolonged epidural placement time.

The 'Blind approach' is the current standard of care in administering neuraxial anesthesia. The physician palpates the patient's spinal bony landmarks; the needle is placed in relation to identified landmarks and inserted until loss of resistance is felt. In the obese population, the success rates are as low as 68%. Recently the FDA has approved a handheld device "The Accuro" as an adjunct for neuraxial analgesia (Rivanna Medical, LLC). It consists of a three-dimensional ultrasound device. By utilizing sound waves it constructs three-dimensional images of the spinal column, allowing the physician to better see the spine in order to perform spinal/epidural anesthesia.

Hypothesize that this device will enable clinicians to assess epidural spaces for epidural needle placement compared with the traditional Blind approach in the morbidly obese parturient.

This study will be a randomized control study, with the objective to evaluate epidural analgesia success rates between the two methods (Blind Approach versus Accuro Device). Also, will determine if ultrasound based landmarks would reduce the needle tract and thereby reduced the amount of post-procedure pain at the insertion site in the peripartum period by using the algometer.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Galveston, Texas, United States, 77555
        • The University of Texas Medical Branch

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I, II, or III.
  • Term pregnancy.
  • Requesting epidural analgesia for anticipated vaginal delivery.
  • BMI>or = 40.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication for epidural analgesia
  • Inability to adequately understand the consent form.
  • Incarcerated patients.
  • Patients with known spinal deformities.
  • Allergies to ultrasound gel.
  • Allergies to local anesthetics

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Palpation
The control group (Group 2: Epidural) will receive the 'Blind/standard approach', which is the current standard of care using palpation in administering labor epidural analgesia. Additionally, an anesthesiologist will scan patient's back with Accuro device in turn off mode.
The control group (Group 2: Epidural) will receive the 'Blind approach/palpation', which is using palpation in administering labor epidural analgesia. Additionally, anesthesiologist will scan patient's back with Accuro device in turned off mode
Experimental: Rivanna Accuro 3D Ultrasound Device
The treatment group (Group 1: Ultrasound and Epidural) will receive epidural analgesia using ultrasound pre-procedural scan with the ACCURO device.
The treatment group (Group 1: Ultrasound and Epidural) will receive epidural analgesia using ultrasound pre-procedural scan with the ACCURO device

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Needle Insertion Attempts Calculated Across All Participants
Time Frame: Beginning of needle insertion till catheter placement-15 minutes
An epidural insertion attempt will be defined as advancement of the needle in an effort to enter the epidural space; a needle requiring withdrawal for redirection or reinsertion through the skin/another skin puncture will be counted as an additional attempt.
Beginning of needle insertion till catheter placement-15 minutes
Number of Participants With Successful Epidural Catheter Placements
Time Frame: Within first 90 minutes following catheter placement
Number of Participants With Successful Epidural Catheter Placements.
Within first 90 minutes following catheter placement
Number of Needle Insertion Redirections Calculated Across All Participants
Time Frame: Beginning of needle insertion till catheter placement-15 minutes
An epidural insertion attempt will be defined as advancement of the needle in an effort to enter the epidural space; a needle requiring withdrawal for redirection or reinsertion through the skin/another skin puncture will be counted as an additional attempt.
Beginning of needle insertion till catheter placement-15 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procedural Difficulty Rated by the Performing Anesthesiologist on a 10-point Likert Scale
Time Frame: Beginning of needle insertion till catheter placement-15 minutes
Procedural difficulty will be rated by the performing anesthesiologist on a 10-point Likert scale from one (easy) to ten (extremely difficult).
Beginning of needle insertion till catheter placement-15 minutes
Needle Depth
Time Frame: Beginning of needle insertion till catheter placement-15 minutes
We will also record thouy needle depth from skin and measured depth by ultrasound.
Beginning of needle insertion till catheter placement-15 minutes
Pressure Pain Thresholds
Time Frame: Before epidural placement
Pressure pain thresholds will be obtained immediately prior to the epidural placement using the pressure pain device.
Before epidural placement
Number of Complications Recorded Calculated Across All Participants
Time Frame: Within 30 days of admission
The number of complications related to the epidural recorded within 30 days of admission.
Within 30 days of admission

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rovnat Babazade, MD, The University of Texas Medical Branch

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 20, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 11, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

January 11, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 2, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 17-0286

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Palpation

Search Similar Trials