Blood Culture Improvement Guidelines and Diagnostic Stewardship for Antibiotic Reduction in Critically Ill Children (Bright STAR)

March 9, 2022 updated by: Johns Hopkins University
This study will test the hypothesis that reliable implementation of an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for evaluation of patients with signs and symptoms of sepsis will decrease antibiotic use in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The Bright STAR Collaborative (BSC), or Blood Culture Improvement Guidelines and Diagnostic Stewardship for Antibiotic Reduction in Critically Ill Children Collaborative, is a multicenter quality improvement program to reduce blood culture use within pediatric intensive care units. Investigators will use data collected by participating sites to determine whether reliable implementation of clinical practice guidelines for evaluation of patients with signs and symptoms of sepsis can decrease antibiotic use in pediatric intensive care units. Investigators will perform a quasi-experimental study to compare outcome data in pre- and post- periods.

Greater than or equal to 10 institutions will participate in this collaborative. Participating institutions will develop and implement an evidenced-based clinical decision-making tool as part of their quality improvement (QI) program in their pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

Aim 1: To determine if reliable implementation of clinical practice guidelines for evaluation of patients with signs and symptoms of sepsis can decrease blood culture use in pediatric intensive care units.

Aim 2: To determine if reliable implementation of clinical practice guidelines for evaluation of patients with signs and symptoms of sepsis can decrease central line-associated bloodstream infections in pediatric intensive care units.

Aim 3. To determine if reliable implementation of clinical practice guidelines for evaluation of patients with signs and symptoms of sepsis can reduce antibiotic use and Clostridium difficile infection.

Aim 4. To determine whether a clinical practice guideline for evaluation of patients with signs and symptoms of sepsis in the PICU has an unintended consequence of patient harm.

Aim 5. To evaluate the implementation of a multi-institutional quality improvement initiative and identify strategies for successful scale-up and adoption of similar practice guidelines in other clinical settings.

Variables: blood cultures and central line-associated blood stream infections (CLABSIs), antibiotic use, , episodes of Clostridium difficile infection mortality, length of stay, ICU readmission, hospital readmission, episodes of sepsis, and episodes of septic shock.

Analyses: The analytic approach equates to estimating and comparing the blood culture incidence during the "baseline/pre-implementation" and "post-implementation" periods, using a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) assuming a Poisson distribution for the monthly number of blood cultures with the monthly number of patient days as an offset. Similar analyses will be conducted to evaluate the incidence of blood cultures drawn from central lines and CLABSIs. Due to the expected low incidence of CLABSIs, investigators will define time in quarters, not months, for that outcome. Similar analyses will be performed for secondary outcomes.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
15

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • St. Louis Children's Hospital, Washington University
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
        • Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • OHSU Doernbecher Children's Hospital
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78723
        • Dell Children's Medical Center of Central Texas
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98105
        • Seattle Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

ICU patient populations from units that develop and implement a quality improvement program to reduce blood culture use

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Institutions that plan to develop and implement a quality improvement program to reduce blood culture use in their ICUs

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No exclusion criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Multicenter Quality Improvement program
Locally developed and reliably implemented ICU Quality Improvement program to reduce blood culture use.
Other: Multicenter Quality Improvement program
Participating institutions will not participate in an intervention study. Sites will design and implement local QI programs to improve care within their unit. Local healthcare teams, who are interested in directly and immediately improving patient outcomes, will devise customized tools. The Bright STAR Team will assess the impact of these local QI initiatives on patient health outcomes, using data that are collected as part of the QI programs or through routine clinical care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Blood culture rate
Time Frame: Change in blood cultures per 100 patient days per month at 42 months
The primary outcome of interest is blood culture rate in participating PICUs. A blood culture will be defined as any blood culture processed by the clinical microbiology laboratory.
Change in blood cultures per 100 patient days per month at 42 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI).
Time Frame: 42 months
The secondary outcome of interest is CLABSIs in participating PICUs. The outcome measurement will include a denominator of catheter days in the participating units.We will measure the change in CLABSI rate per month.
42 months
Broad spectrum antibiotic use
Time Frame: 42 months
Use of broad spectrum antibiotics; Total antibiotic days per 1,000 patient days per quarter
42 months
Clostridium difficile infection
Time Frame: 42 months
Incidence of infections per 1000 patient days per quarter
42 months
Mortality
Time Frame: 42 months
Death per hospital total ICU admissions comparing pre and post-intervention periods
42 months
Length of ICU stay
Time Frame: 42 months
Days in ICU; median number of days comparing pre and post-intervention periods
42 months
ICU readmission
Time Frame: 42 months
Readmission to the ICU within 7 days of discharge. We will measure the change in rate of readmission per total ICU admissions comparing pre and post-intervention periods
42 months
Hospital readmission
Time Frame: 42 months
Readmission to hospital within 7 days of discharge where we measured change in rate of hospital readmission comparing pre and post-intervention periods at
42 months
Sepsis
Time Frame: 42 months
Defined by the following: International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes ; Admissions with ICD-10 coded sepsis per total ICU admissions
42 months
Septic shock
Time Frame: 42 months
Defined by the following: ICD-10 codes; Admissions with ICD-10 coded septic shock per total ICU admissions
42 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Johns Hopkins University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Aaron Milstone, MD, MHS, Johns Hopkins University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 28, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 28, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 7, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 14, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 22, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 11, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 9, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB00147182

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

We will not collect any. We will only gather summary-level non Patient Health Information (PHI) from participating sites.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

Clinical Trials on Multicenter Quality Improvement program

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings