Blood Culture Improvement Guidelines and Diagnostic Stewardship for Antibiotic Reduction in Critically Ill Children (Bright STAR)

March 9, 2022 updated by: Johns Hopkins University
This study will test the hypothesis that reliable implementation of an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for evaluation of patients with signs and symptoms of sepsis will decrease antibiotic use in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The Bright STAR Collaborative (BSC), or Blood Culture Improvement Guidelines and Diagnostic Stewardship for Antibiotic Reduction in Critically Ill Children Collaborative, is a multicenter quality improvement program to reduce blood culture use within pediatric intensive care units. Investigators will use data collected by participating sites to determine whether reliable implementation of clinical practice guidelines for evaluation of patients with signs and symptoms of sepsis can decrease antibiotic use in pediatric intensive care units. Investigators will perform a quasi-experimental study to compare outcome data in pre- and post- periods.

Greater than or equal to 10 institutions will participate in this collaborative. Participating institutions will develop and implement an evidenced-based clinical decision-making tool as part of their quality improvement (QI) program in their pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

Aim 1: To determine if reliable implementation of clinical practice guidelines for evaluation of patients with signs and symptoms of sepsis can decrease blood culture use in pediatric intensive care units.

Aim 2: To determine if reliable implementation of clinical practice guidelines for evaluation of patients with signs and symptoms of sepsis can decrease central line-associated bloodstream infections in pediatric intensive care units.

Aim 3. To determine if reliable implementation of clinical practice guidelines for evaluation of patients with signs and symptoms of sepsis can reduce antibiotic use and Clostridium difficile infection.

Aim 4. To determine whether a clinical practice guideline for evaluation of patients with signs and symptoms of sepsis in the PICU has an unintended consequence of patient harm.

Aim 5. To evaluate the implementation of a multi-institutional quality improvement initiative and identify strategies for successful scale-up and adoption of similar practice guidelines in other clinical settings.

Variables: blood cultures and central line-associated blood stream infections (CLABSIs), antibiotic use, , episodes of Clostridium difficile infection mortality, length of stay, ICU readmission, hospital readmission, episodes of sepsis, and episodes of septic shock.

Analyses: The analytic approach equates to estimating and comparing the blood culture incidence during the "baseline/pre-implementation" and "post-implementation" periods, using a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) assuming a Poisson distribution for the monthly number of blood cultures with the monthly number of patient days as an offset. Similar analyses will be conducted to evaluate the incidence of blood cultures drawn from central lines and CLABSIs. Due to the expected low incidence of CLABSIs, investigators will define time in quarters, not months, for that outcome. Similar analyses will be performed for secondary outcomes.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • St. Louis Children's Hospital, Washington University
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
        • Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • OHSU Doernbecher Children's Hospital
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78723
        • Dell Children's Medical Center of Central Texas
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98105
        • Seattle Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

ICU patient populations from units that develop and implement a quality improvement program to reduce blood culture use

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Institutions that plan to develop and implement a quality improvement program to reduce blood culture use in their ICUs

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No exclusion criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Multicenter Quality Improvement program
Locally developed and reliably implemented ICU Quality Improvement program to reduce blood culture use.
Participating institutions will not participate in an intervention study. Sites will design and implement local QI programs to improve care within their unit. Local healthcare teams, who are interested in directly and immediately improving patient outcomes, will devise customized tools. The Bright STAR Team will assess the impact of these local QI initiatives on patient health outcomes, using data that are collected as part of the QI programs or through routine clinical care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Blood culture rate
Time Frame: Change in blood cultures per 100 patient days per month at 42 months
The primary outcome of interest is blood culture rate in participating PICUs. A blood culture will be defined as any blood culture processed by the clinical microbiology laboratory.
Change in blood cultures per 100 patient days per month at 42 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI).
Time Frame: 42 months
The secondary outcome of interest is CLABSIs in participating PICUs. The outcome measurement will include a denominator of catheter days in the participating units.We will measure the change in CLABSI rate per month.
42 months
Broad spectrum antibiotic use
Time Frame: 42 months
Use of broad spectrum antibiotics; Total antibiotic days per 1,000 patient days per quarter
42 months
Clostridium difficile infection
Time Frame: 42 months
Incidence of infections per 1000 patient days per quarter
42 months
Mortality
Time Frame: 42 months
Death per hospital total ICU admissions comparing pre and post-intervention periods
42 months
Length of ICU stay
Time Frame: 42 months
Days in ICU; median number of days comparing pre and post-intervention periods
42 months
ICU readmission
Time Frame: 42 months
Readmission to the ICU within 7 days of discharge. We will measure the change in rate of readmission per total ICU admissions comparing pre and post-intervention periods
42 months
Hospital readmission
Time Frame: 42 months
Readmission to hospital within 7 days of discharge where we measured change in rate of hospital readmission comparing pre and post-intervention periods at
42 months
Sepsis
Time Frame: 42 months
Defined by the following: International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes ; Admissions with ICD-10 coded sepsis per total ICU admissions
42 months
Septic shock
Time Frame: 42 months
Defined by the following: ICD-10 codes; Admissions with ICD-10 coded septic shock per total ICU admissions
42 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aaron Milstone, MD, MHS, Johns Hopkins University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 28, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 28, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

February 22, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 11, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

We will not collect any. We will only gather summary-level non Patient Health Information (PHI) from participating sites.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

Clinical Trials on Multicenter Quality Improvement program

Subscribe