Protocol-guided Rapid Evaluation of Veterans Experiencing New Transient Neurological Symptoms (PREVENT)

March 14, 2023 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

Protocol-guided Rapid Evaluation of Veterans Experiencing New Transient Neurological Symptoms (PREVENT) (QUE 15-280)

This program will seek to implement a quality improvement program to improve the care of Veterans with TIA or minor stroke at 6 Veteran Health Administration Hospitals. The investigators will evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the quality improvement program.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Aim 1. To develop a quality improvement program to improve the care of Veterans with TIA or minor stroke that can be deployed nationwide. The program will include multiple components: a reporting system that is based on validated electronic quality measures (eCQMs) that will allow staff to monitor the time-sensitive processes of care and outcomes of their population of Veterans with TIA or minor stroke; clinical protocols to improve the timeliness and completeness of care; professional education materials; and clinical note templates for use by nursing and pharmacy staff. Lessons learned at the individual sites engaged in the quality improvement program will be shared across sites by use of a web-based platform and a virtual collaborative. We will assess end user's assessment of the program and its core elements.

Aim 2. To evaluate the effectiveness of the Aim 1 QI intervention program for Veterans with TIA or minor stroke against usual care. Teams at the 6 intervention sites will be given the quality improvement program components. The primary effectiveness outcome is the proportion of Veterans who received all of the guideline-concordant processes of care for which they are eligible referred to as the "Without-Fail" care rate.

Aim 3. To evaluate the implementation of the QI intervention program across the 6 participating sites. The two primary implementation outcomes will be the number of implementation activities completed during the one-year active implementation period and the final level of team organization (defined as the Group Organization (GO Score)) for improving TIA care at the end of the 12-month active implementation period.

Secondary Aim To evaluate the sustainability of the program. Sustainability will be evaluated over a one-year period that begins immediately after the one-year active implementation period. We will compare the Without-Fail rate in the sustainability period to the baseline period and the post-implementation period.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2292

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202-2884
        • Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • This program will seek VA hospitals that are self-designated as either a VHA Primary Stroke Center or a Limited Hours Stroke Facility or Supporting Stroke Center.
  • Eligibility for staff interviews is based on involvement in the QI intervention and willingness to participate.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unwilling to participate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: QI with External Facilitation
Receive external facilitation to support implementation of the quality improvement program
The Intervention is a QI Program that will include multiple components as described above.
Other Names:
  • QI Intervention
No Intervention: Control
Non-Intervention VA Medical Centers

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effectiveness: Without-fail Care Rate
Time Frame: Over the course of One Year active implementation
Teams at the 6 intervention sites will be given both the QI program (to improve care) and eCQM data (to monitor the care they are delivering to their patients). The primary effectiveness outcome is the proportion of Veterans who received all of the guideline-concordant processes of care for which they are eligible referred to as the "Without-Fail" care rate. Determined by analysis of electronic medical record data.
Over the course of One Year active implementation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recurrent Vascular Events
Time Frame: 90-days from presentation
The recurrent event endpoint included: congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction/acute coronary syndrome, ischemic stroke, TIA, ventricular arrhythmia, or death from any cause
90-days from presentation
The Group Organization (GO) Score
Time Frame: Measured at the end of the one-year active implementation period
The GO Score refers to the Group Organization Score for improving TIA care quality; it is a measure of team activation and cohesion. The GO score is measured on a scale of 0-10 based on specific practices in place during a given time period and scored by the evaluation team. A score of 0-3 indicates the absence of a facility-wide approach; 4-5 reflects a developing facility-wide approach; 6-7 denotes basic proficiency with the presence of a comprehensive facility-wide program; and 8-10 indicates the presence of a mature, facility-wide system that can sustain key personnel turnover. The GO Score was measured only among the N=6 PREVENT sites.
Measured at the end of the one-year active implementation period
Number of Quality Improvement Activities Completed
Time Frame: One-year active implementation period
The number of implementation activities completed during the one-year active implementation period
One-year active implementation period
Program Satisfaction
Time Frame: Measured at the end of the one-year active implementation period
Overall staff satisfaction with the program was assessed with a single question with the response scale ranging from 1 to 7 where 7 indicated "extremely satisfied." Program satisfaction was measured only at the six PREVENT intervention sites.
Measured at the end of the one-year active implementation period

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinician Satisfaction-Staff Interview
Time Frame: Up to 2 one hour interviews occurring once at baseline (within 6 months of start of 1 year implementation) and once at final (within 6 months of end of 1 year implementation)
The clinician satisfaction with the QI program will be determined by qualitative analysis of transcribed/coded semi-structured interview. Each interviewed staff will be interviewed two times over the course of the study.
Up to 2 one hour interviews occurring once at baseline (within 6 months of start of 1 year implementation) and once at final (within 6 months of end of 1 year implementation)
Provider Assessment of Program-Staff Interview
Time Frame: Up to 2 one hour interviews occurring once at baseline (within 6 months of start of 1 year implementation) and once at final (within 6 months of finish of 1 year implementation)
Provider assessment of the QI program, training, and eCQM program in terms of usability, complexity, and relative advantage will be determined by qualitative analysis of transcribed/coded semi-structured interview
Up to 2 one hour interviews occurring once at baseline (within 6 months of start of 1 year implementation) and once at final (within 6 months of finish of 1 year implementation)
Adaptability -Staff Interview
Time Frame: Up to 2 one hour interviews occurring once at baseline (within 6 months of start of 1 year implementation) and once at final (within 6 months of end of 1 year implementation)
The adaptability of the program over the course of the study will be gained through qualitative mixed method analysis of transcribed interviews held at baseline and at the final phase of the one year active implementation period.
Up to 2 one hour interviews occurring once at baseline (within 6 months of start of 1 year implementation) and once at final (within 6 months of end of 1 year implementation)
Number of completed quality improvement activities
Time Frame: One year active implementation period
The total of number of completed quality improvement activities will be calculated for each of the participating sites. This will be used as an implementation outcome.
One year active implementation period
Group Organization (GO) Score for Providing TIA care
Time Frame: One year of active implementation period
The GO score for providing TIA care will be calculated for each participating site at Baseline and again at the end of the active implementation period. This will be used as an implementation outcome.
One year of active implementation period
Group Organization (GO) Score for Improving TIA Care
Time Frame: One year of active implementation period
The GO score for improving TIA care will be calculated for each participating site at Baseline and again at the end of the active implementation period. This will be used as an implementation outcome.
One year of active implementation period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Teresa M. Damush, PhD, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN
  • Principal Investigator: Dawn M. Bravata, MD, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

May 11, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Investigators interested in examining PREVENT project data should contact the PI, Dr. Dawn Bravata.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Quality Improvement Program

3
Subscribe