Intracorporeal Vs Extracorporeal Urinary Diversion After Robot Assisted Radical Cystectomy

March 20, 2025 updated by: Mark L. Gonzalgo, MD, PhD, University of Miami

Randomized Clinical Trial of Intracorporeal Vs Extracorporeal Urinary Diversion After Robot Assisted Radical Cystectomy

Intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICD) provides superior postoperative outcomes compared to extracorporeal urinary diversion (ECD). The investigators' hypothesis that ICD may provide clinical benefit is based on principles of less bowel and ureteral handling, superior operating room workflow, less exposure to the external environment, and optimal visualization with ICD while utilizing a smaller incision compared to ECD. ICD should have less bowel-related complications, lower pain scores allowing patients to be discharged from the hospital sooner and regain functional independence more quickly.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
38

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • University of Miami

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Biopsy-proven urothelial cancer being considered for RARC.
  • Clinical stage T1-T4, N0-1, M0 or refractory carcinoma in situ.
  • Subject must be already scheduled to have a RARC at the discretion of the surgeon and with the patient's agreement.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to give informed consent
  • Prior major abdominal and pelvic open surgical procedures that would preclude a safe robotic approach, as determined by the treating surgeon.
  • At the discretion of the treating surgeon, any pre-existing condition such as severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease that precludes a safe initiation or maintenance of pneumoperitoneum over a prolonged period of time and during surgery.
  • Age <18 or >99 years.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Extracorporeal Urinary Diversion (ECD)
Participants will be randomized to receiving ECD after scheduled Robotic Assisted Radical Cystectomy (RARC).
Procedure: Extracorporeal Urinary Diversion
Extra-corporeal urinary diversion, provided as part of standard of care, will have the ureters sutured into the ileal conduit by hand.
Other Names:
  • ECD
Experimental: Intracorporal Urinary Diversion (ICD)
Participants will be randomized to receiving ICD after scheduled Robotic Assisted Radical Cystectomy (RARC).
Procedure: Intracorporal Urinary Diversion
Intracorporal Urinary Diversion, provided as part of standard of care, will have the ureters sutured into the ileal conduit using the Da Vinci robot.
Other Names:
  • ICD

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
90-day Major Post-Operative Complication Rate
Time Frame: 90 days
Major complication rate at 90-days from RARC + urinary diversion using the modified Clavien-Dindo grading system. Major complication is defined as Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥ 3.
90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
90-day Any Post-Operative Complication Rate
Time Frame: 90 days
Any complication rates at 90-days from RARC + urinary diversion, using the modified Clavien-Dindo grading system as low grade (1-2) or high grade (3-5).
90 days
Length of Hospital Stay in ECD vs ICD Study Participants
Time Frame: About 2 weeks
Length of hospital stay for study participants undergoing ECD versus ICD urinary diversion post-RARC, as recorded at hospital discharge.
About 2 weeks
90-day Readmission Rate
Time Frame: 90 days
Rate of readmission to hospital at 90 days post-RARC followed by ECD or ICD urinary diversion.
90 days
Rate of Return to the Operating room within 90 days
Time Frame: Up to 90 days
Rate of return to the operating room within 90 days after RARC followed by ICD or ECD Urinary Diversion.
Up to 90 days
Mortality Rate at 90 days
Time Frame: 90 days
Rate of mortality (death) at 90 days in study participants
90 days
Rate of Bowel-Specific Complications
Time Frame: Up to 36 months
Rate of bowel-specific complications in study participants (including incidence of mechanical bowel obstruction, anastomotic leaks, and surgical site infections) and post operative pain. Bowel-specific complications will be assessed using the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.
Up to 36 months
Functional Independence Recovery as measured by the ADL Questionnaire
Time Frame: Up to 36 months
Rate of functional independence recovery as measured by patient-reported scores on the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) questionnaire. For the ADL, the total score ranges from 0 to 6, with the higher scores indicating functional improvement and lower scores indicating functional deterioration.
Up to 36 months
Functional Independence Recovery as measured by the IADL Questionnaire
Time Frame: Up to 36 months
Rate of functional independence recovery as measured by an aggregate of patient-reported scores on the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) questionnaire. For the IADL, the total score ranges from 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating functional functional improvement and lower scores indicating functional deterioration.
Up to 36 months
Functional Independence Recovery as measured by the Hand Grip Strength Test.
Time Frame: Up to 36 months
The Hand Grip Strength Test measures the amount of static force that a participant's hand can squeeze around a dynamometer. The test is measured in kilograms.
Up to 36 months
Functional Independence Recovery as measured by the Timed Up and Go (TUG) Walking Test
Time Frame: Up to 36 months
The TUG test times participants as they rise from a standard chair, walk 3 meters, turn, walk back and sit again. The test is measured in seconds.
Up to 36 months
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) as assessed by SF-8 Health Survey
Time Frame: Up to 36 months
HRQoL measured by patient scores on the Short Form 8 (SF-8) Health Survey. The SF-8 is a questionnaire consisting of 8-items and two component summary scores: Physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS). They are scored by weighting each score to a norm-based scoring model. The total scores will be reported as a percentile with higher score indicating better health-related quality of life.
Up to 36 months
HRQoL as assessed by the FACT-VCI Questionnaire
Time Frame: Up to 36 months
HRQoL measured by patient scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Vanderbilt Cystectomy Index (FACT-VCI) questionnaire. The FACT-VCI is a condition-specific instrument for patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) and urinary diversion (UD) for bladder cancer. The questionnaire consists of 44 items scored on a range from 0 ("Not at all") to 4 ("Very Much"), resulting in an ordinal Likert scale, with higher scores indicating a better HRQoL. The FACT-VCI measures quality of life across five domains: Physical wellbeing, social/family wellbeing, emotional wellbeing, functional wellbeing and an additional concerns subscale.
Up to 36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Miami

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Mark L Gonzalgo, MD, PhD, University of Miami

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 25, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 20, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 11, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 6, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 12, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 20, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 20170004

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bladder Cancer

Clinical Trials on Extracorporeal Urinary Diversion

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings