A Comparison of the Studer Pouch Versus the T-Pouch Orthotopic Neobladder Urinary Diversion in Bladder Cancer Patients

January 23, 2019 updated by: University of Southern California

A Randomized Comparison of the Studer Pouch vs. the T-Pouch Orthotopic Neobladder Urinary Diversion in Bladder Cancer Patients

This is a prospective, randomized study of two types of continent ileal neobladder construction in patients undergoing cystectomy for primary bladder cancer. Patients will be randomly assigned to have either a T-pouch or a Studer pouch constructed at the time of their surgery. They will be followed long-term to determine the relative advantages and disadvantages of the two types of diversion. The investigators' hypothesis is that the inclusion of an antireflux mechanism in the T-pouch will result in significantly fewer episodes of symptomatic urinary tract infection, and will have a lower incidence of upper tract dilation and loss of renal function over the long term.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

529

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90033
        • USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer who are considered candidates for a neobladder reconstruction are eligible for enrollment.
  • Diagnosed with primary bladder cancer (any histology).
  • Scheduled to undergo a radical cystectomy (cystoprostatectomy in men and anterior exenteration in women).
  • Felt by the treating physician to be a candidate for an orthotopic neobladder urinary diversion.
  • Be competent and willing to sign the informed consent.
  • Patients may have received previous radiation therapy or intravesical or systemic chemotherapy. Patients with documented metastatic disease are not excluded as long as they are felt to be candidates for a continent neobladder urinary diversion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing radical cystectomy for any malignancy other than primary bladder cancer (for example prostate cancer or colon cancer invading the bladder,or a gynecologic malignancy), or non-malignant disease (such as a neurogenic bladder or radiation cystitis).
  • Unwilling or unable to sign the informed consent.
  • Not eligible for an orthotopic neobladder reconstruction.
  • A history of other malignancy (except for stage I cancer treated with curative intent without evidence of recurrence, clinically localized prostate cancer either untreated or treated with prostatectomy or radiation therapy or hormone therapy,or non-melanoma skin cancer) within the previous 5 years.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Studer Pouch
Studer Pouch orthotopic urinary diversion
EXPERIMENTAL: T-Pouch
T-Pouch orthotopic urinary diversion

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The primary endpoint is the long-term outcome (> 3 years) as it pertains to renal function, anatomy of the upper urinary tracts, and the requirement for medical or surgical intervention (ie for symptomatic urinary tract infections).
Time Frame: 3 years after date of last patient enrolled
3 years after date of last patient enrolled

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
A secondary endpoint is the length of surgery and the incidence of early postoperative complications (<30 days from surgery) believed to be related to the type of urinary diversion.
Time Frame: Within 30 days after surgery
Within 30 days after surgery
An additional secondary endpoint is cancer recurrence and overall survival, which will be recorded in each patient.
Time Frame: Yearly for the first 5 years, then every 2 years
Yearly for the first 5 years, then every 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 4, 2002

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 14, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 14, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 4, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2009

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 6, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 25, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bladder Cancer

Clinical Trials on Studer Pouch orthotopic urinary diversion

Subscribe