A Mechanistic Evaluation of the Nociceptive Desensitizing Properties of Topical Capsaicin

April 17, 2020 updated by: Silvia Lo Vecchio, Aalborg University

En undersøgelse af Mekanismerne Bag Nociceptiv Desensibilisering forårsaget af Topikal Capsaicin

The aim of this project is to study the role of transient receptor potential (TRP-) channel V1 (TRPV1+) fibers in the development of cutaneous inflammation induced by epidermal Ultraviolet-B damage. Moreover, in this project the investigators want to evaluate if the capsaicin-desensitization action can still be induced in a skin area pretreated with topical, local anesthetic lidocaine.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In this project the Ultraviolet- B pain model, a model using type B ultraviolet rays to induce a first-degree sunburn, will be used to induce a non-specific inflammation in the skin. This model is well-known to produce both peripheral and central hyperalgesia through sensitization of peripheral and central nociceptors. Capsaicin, the active substance in chili peppers, is currently used to treat peripheral neuropathic pain, and prolonged application of 8% capsaicin patch causes profound desensitization to painful heat stimuli and itch provocations. Therefore, the investigators would like to monitor the development of unspecific UVB-cutaneous inflammation and consequent neurogenic flare in a capsaicin pre-treated area. Moreover the investigators want to test if pre-treating the skin with lidocaine can reduce the pain associated with the capsaicin application without affecting its desensitization action.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
44

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Denmark
    • Nordjylland
      • Aalborg, Nordjylland, Denmark, 9000
        • Silvia Lo Vecchio

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Healthy men and women
  • 18-60 years
  • Caucasian descent (only in sub-study 1)
  • Speak and understand English

Exclusion criteria:

  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Drug addiction defined as any use of cannabis, opioids or other drugs
  • Previous or current neurologic, musculoskeletal or mental illnesses
  • Lack of ability to cooperate
  • Current use of medications that may affect the trial
  • Skin diseases
  • Consumption of alcohol or painkillers 24 hours before the study days and between these
  • Moles or tattoos in the area to be treated or tested.
  • Exposure of the irradiated area to UV radiation (e.g., sun) 48 hours before the study days and between these
  • Acute or chronic pain
  • Participation in other trials within 1 week of study entry (4 weeks in the case of pharmaceutical trials)
  • Known history of anaphylactic shock, or local allergy (contact dermatitis) to lidocaine, prilocaine or other local anaesthetics of the amide type.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Capsaicin+UVB group
All subjects will be treated with capsaicin, placebo + UVB, or Capsaicin+UVB.
Drug: Capsaicin Topical
Capsaicin patches (dosage form: patch 8% Qutenza) will be applied on 4x4 cm squared areas on the volar forearm. The patches will be left in place for 24h and 3 hours after which they will be removed.
Radiation: Ultraviolet-B (UVB) irradiation
Two circular areas (Ø 2 cm) on the forearm are irradiated with 2 x MED (Minimal Erythema Dose) dose of UVB using a calibrated UVB machine (290-320nm wavelength), Saal Mann Multi Tester (Mann Saal, LT SBC 400 Herford, Germany).
Experimental: Capsaicin + EMLA group
All subjects will be pre-treated with lidocain cream before capsaicin application
Drug: Capsaicin Topical
Capsaicin patches (dosage form: patch 8% Qutenza) will be applied on 4x4 cm squared areas on the volar forearm. The patches will be left in place for 24h and 3 hours after which they will be removed.
Other: Histamine 1%
To deliver histamine, standard allergy skin prick test (SPT) lancets are applied. The lancets have a 1 mm shouldered tip adapt to introduce a small amount of test substance extremely locally and approximately at the dermo-epidermal junction.
Drug: Lidocaine
Cutaneous anaesthesia will be topically induced by using EMLA cream 5%, a local anaesthetic cream consisting of equal parts of lidocaine and prilocaine (1g contains 25 mg of lidocaine and 25 mg of prilocaine)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Superficial blood perfusion measured by a Speckle contrast imager (FLPI, Moor Instruments, England).
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 7 days after intervention
Changes from baseline to 7 days after intervention
Measurement of Warm Detection Thresholds and Heat thresholds by using a PATHWAY ATS (Medoc Ltd, Israel) thermal sensory testing device.
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 7 days after intervention
Changes from baseline to 7 days after intervention
Measurement of Pain to Supra-threshold Heat Stimuli by using a PATHWAY ATS (Medoc Ltd, Israel) thermal sensory testing device.
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 7 days after intervention
Changes from baseline to 7 days after intervention
Measurement of Mechanical Pain Thresholds and Sensitivity using a pin-prick set consisting of 8 needles each having a diameter of 0.6 mm and different force applications: 0.8, 1.6, 3.2, 6.4, 12.8, 25.6, 50.1 and 60.0 g.
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 7 days after intervention
Changes from baseline to 7 days after intervention
Trans-epidermal Water Loss (TEWL) using a 2x2 cm probe to measure the humidity gradient of the skin.
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 7 days after intervention
Changes from baseline to 7 days after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
assessment of pain rating by using a visual analog scales (VAS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 24 h
The subject will report the peak and average of the perceived pain sensation during the last 24 hours (on a VAs scale from 0 indicating 'no pain' to100 indicating 'worst imaginable pain').
Change from baseline to 24 h
Itch rating by using a visual analog scales (VAS)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 7 days after intervention
Itch is monitored for 9 minutes using a visual analog scale from 0 indicating 'no itch' to100 indicating 'worst imaginable itch.
Changes from baseline to 7 days after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Aalborg University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 21, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 13, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 16, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 17, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • N-20180034

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings