Lumbar Fusion With Nexxt Spine 3D-Printed Titanium Interbody Cages

May 22, 2023 updated by: Andrew Grossbach, Ohio State University

Lumbar Fusion With 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Interbody Cages - A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Nexxt Matrixx(TM) Versus PEEK Cages

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to assess and compare radiographic and clinical outcomes in patients who are to undergo combined interbody/posterolateral lumbar fusion procedures, supplemented with pedicle screw instrumentation, using one of the following interbody cages; the Nexxt Spine Nexxt MatrixxTM 3D-printed titanium cage or the HonourTM poly-ether-ether-ketone cage.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This randomized controlled trial will prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Nexxt MatrixxTM System titanium implant supplemented with a pedicle screw system as compared to a representative PEEK cage currently used in routine fashion for lumbar interbody fusion procedures. This study will capture clinical and radiographic outcomes on patients up to 2 years post operatively. Both cages will be used in conjunction with milled local autograft bone generated as part of the spinal fusion procedure (no iliac crest autograft will be utilized).

This single centered study will enroll up to 70 subjects (n = 35 per group), with subjects followed for 24 months post-surgery. All subjects enrolled in the study will be recruited from a pool of subjects eligible for combined interbody/posterolateral lumbar fusion surgery.

Subjects will be randomized in the trial to receive either the Nexxt Spine Nexxt MatrixxTM 3D-printed titanium cage or the HonourTM PEEK cage supplemented with a pedicle screw system and milled local autograft bone. Subject randomization will be stratified according to smoking status. Subjects will be blinded to their group status for the duration of the study assessments and procedures (24 months post-operatively). Subject study data will be collected preoperatively, intra-operatively and postoperatively at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
53

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Shelby Miracle

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is scheduled to undergo combined interbody and posterolateral spinal fusion surgery using either the Nexxt MatrixxTM 3D-printed titanium cage or HonourTM PEEK cage in conjunction with local autograft bone, and supplementation with a pedicle screw system.
  • Subject must be over the age of 18 years old.
  • Subject has been unresponsive to conservative care for a minimum of 6 months.
  • The subject must in the investigator's opinion, be psychosocially, mentally, and physically able to fully comply with this protocol including the required follow-up visits, the filling out of required forms, and have the ability to understand and give written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with previous lumbar arthrodesis surgery.
  • Subjects requiring additional bone grafting materials other than local autograft bone.
  • Subject has inadequate tissue coverage over the operative site.
  • Subject has an open wound local to the operative area, or rapid joint disease, bone absorption, or osteoporosis.
  • Subject has a condition requiring medications that may interfere with bone or soft tissue healing (i.e., oral or parenteral glucocorticoids, immunosuppressives, methotrexate, etc.).
  • Subject has an active local or systemic infection.
  • Subject has a metal sensitivity/foreign body sensitivity.
  • Subject is morbidly obese, defined as a body mass index (BMI) greater than 40.
  • Subject has any medical condition or extenuating circumstance that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study.
  • Subject is currently involved in another investigational drug or device study that could confound study data.
  • Subject has a history (present or past) of substance abuse (recreational drugs, prescription drugs or alcohol) that in the investigator's opinion may interfere with protocol assessments and/or with the subject's ability to complete the protocol required follow-up.
  • Subjects who are pregnant or plan to become pregnant in the next 12 months or who are lactating.
  • Subject is involved in or planning to engage in litigation or receiving Worker's Compensation related to neck or back pain.
  • Subject is a prisoner.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: 3D-printed titanium cage
Subjects enrolled in this arm will have the Nexxt Spine Nexxt MatrixxTM 3D-printed titanium cage (interbody cage) implanted at each level of 1 or 2-level lumbar arthrodesis procedures. All constructs will be supplemented with a pedicle screw system (Depuy Synthes Expedium) cleared for lumbar spinal fusion.
Device: Interbody cage (titanium)
Subject will be implanted with a 3D-printed titanium cage during their lumbar interbody fusion surgery.
Active Comparator: Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) cage
Subjects enrolled in this arm will have the HonourTM poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) cage (interbody cage) implanted at each level of 1 or 2-level lumbar arthrodesis procedures. All constructs will be supplemented with a pedicle screw system (Depuy Synthes Expedium) cleared for lumbar spinal fusion.
Device: Interbody cage (PEEK)
Subject will be implanted with a poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) cage during their lumbar interbody fusion surgery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Interbody Radiographic Fusion Rate
Time Frame: 6 months post-operatively
Interbody fusion will be graded using the Brantigan, Steffee, Fraser (BSF) Scale which classifies fusion between the interbody cage and adjacent bone on a scale of 1-3 where a higher score indicates a better outcome. The grades are defined as follows: Brantigan, Steffee, Fraser-Grade 1 (BSF-1) indicates radiographical pseudarthrosis, Brantigan, Steffee, Fraser-Grade 2 (BSF-2) is defined by radiographical locked pseudarthrosis, and Brantigan, Steffee, Fraser-Grade 3 (BSF-3) is radiographical fusion, indicating the best outcome. The subject will be considered a success if fusion is a Grade BSF-3 at 6 months.
6 months post-operatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-operative Timing of Fusion
Time Frame: 12 months post-operatively
Secondary measures of effectiveness will be determined by timing of fusion observed in X-rays post-operatively. Fusion at one year was defined as a difference in cobb angle of the operated levels between flexion and extension views. More than 2 degrees of change between views indicated non-union at one year.
12 months post-operatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ohio State University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Nexxt Spine, LLC

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 22, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 16, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 16, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 21, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 23, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 27, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 22, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2018H0008

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Clinical Trials on Interbody cage (titanium)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings