MRI Guided Focal Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer (MRgFLA)

June 3, 2026 updated by: University Health Network, Toronto
This clinical research study is designed to determine the ability of in bore MRI guided Focal Laser Ablation (MRgFLA) in patients with early stage carcinoma of prostate. The results will be evaluated by repeated MRI and prostate biopsy. Previous prospective development study demonstrated that FLA may be a viable option for men with low-intermediate risk prostate cancer. The vast majority of patients undergoing this treatment experienced minimal side effects with no peri-operative complications. Over 80% of patients treated with MRgFLA remain on AS and were able to avoid radical therapy at mean follow up duration of 3 years.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Study Objectives are to evaluate the proportion of patients with low-intermediate risk prostate cancer undergoing focal laser ablation (MRgFLA) prostate treatment who will be free of clinically significant Prostate Cancer (PCa), when using a > 5mm margins around the MR visible tumor in defining the ablation contour. The rationale of the study is to show that MRgFLA is a safe procedure that can significantly postpone or eliminate the need for patients with Low-Intermediate Risk prostate cancer to undergo a definitive treatment (i.e., Radical Prostatectomy or Radiation therapy) for their disease. Study population: patients with Low-Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer who are willing to take part in the study and meet study eligibility criteria. Primary Study Objective is to show that MRgFLA can significantly reduce the need for definitive treatment (e.g., Radical Prostatectomy, or Radiation therapy) and is a safe procedure for patients with Low-Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer defined in the current protocol as 1) Gleason score 6 and 7 (=3+4 or 4+3; No Grade 5 pattern), and 2) T1-T2, N0, M0.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
102

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2M9
        • Recruiting
        • Sangeet Ghai, MD
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men 40-80 years of age
  • Histologically proven low-intermediate risk prostate carcinoma; (Gleason score ≤ 7, primary grade ≤ 4;)
  • Prostate cancer clinical stage T1c and T2
  • MR site suspicious for cancer or cancer mapped to one lobe of the prostate using the 3D hybrid TRUS device
  • Size of MR visible tumor <20mm
  • Suspicious site on Prostate MRI must coincide with sector positive for cancer on biopsy
  • Prostate specific antigen (PSA) level <15 ng/mL
  • IPSS, ICIQ-UI-SF, IIEF complete prior to procedure
  • Life expectancy of greater than 10 years, based on co-morbidity not related to prostate cancer.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medically unfit for focal therapy of the prostate
  • Patients who are unwilling or unable to give informed consent;
  • Patients who have received androgen suppression therapy
  • Patients who have received or are receiving chemotherapy for prostate carcinoma;
  • Patients previously treated with surgery to the prostate (traditional, endoscopic or minimally invasive including HIFU, TUNA, RITA, microwave, cryotherapy or any curative treatment
  • Patients who have undergone radiation therapy for prostate cancer or to the pelvis
  • Any condition, or history of illness or surgery that, in the opinion of the Investigator, might confound the results of the study or pose additional risks to the patient (e.g. significant cardiovascular conditions or allergies);
  • Patients with a history of noncompliance with medical therapy and/or medical recommendations;
  • Patients who are unwilling or unable to complete the patient self-assessment questionnaires;
  • Chronic or acute prostatitis, neurogenic bladder, urinary tract infection, sphincter abnormalities, or any other symptom that prevents normal micturition.
  • Patients who have participated in a clinical study and/or received treatment with an investigational treatment and/or product within the past 90 days;
  • Patients with contraindication to MRI (i.e. pacemaker, hip prosthesis, severe claustrophobia, brain aneurysm clip, allergy to MRI contrast agent)
  • Any condition, or history of illness that, in the opinion of the investigator will confound or increase the patient risk during the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Single arm prospective clinical trial
This is a single arm study where patients with low-intermediate risk MR visible locally confined prostate cancer will be treated with focal laser ablation under MRI guidance in the magnet. Following treatment, the patients will be assessed by MRI and Biopsy at 6 months and at 2 years, with PSA assessment at regular intervals during the time
Device: The TRANBERGCLS|Thermal Therapy
MRI Guided Focal Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer by The Diode Laser System - The TRANBERGCLS|Thermal Therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The proportion of study patients clinically free of clinically significant PCa (i.e. requires definitive treatment)
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment completion
Clinically significant PCa will be defined as recurrent/residual Gleason 3+4 or higher, and/or high-volume Gleason 6 disease found at 6-month biopsy.
6 months after treatment completion
The proportion of study patients clinically free of clinically significant PCa (i.e. requires definitive treatment)
Time Frame: 24 months after treatment completion
Clinically significant PCa will be defined as recurrent/residual Gleason 3+4 or higher, and/or high-volume Gleason 6 disease found at 24-month biopsy.
24 months after treatment completion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment effect on patients' Quality of Life (QoL), the following validated self-reported urogenital functioning assessment instruments will be used before and following treatment at pre-specified interval
Time Frame: Baseline before treatment, 30 days, 6 months, 12 months and at 24 months following treatment
Validate Patient-Reported Questionnaire (International Prostate Symptom Score, scale from 0-7 mild, 8-19 moderate, 20-35 severe symptoms, higher values being worse, averages at different time points will be noted to assess improvement, decline or baseline) will be completed by participants throughout the study to assess Health Related Quality of Life.
Baseline before treatment, 30 days, 6 months, 12 months and at 24 months following treatment
Treatment effect on patients' Quality of Life (QoL), the following validated self-reported urogenital functioning assessment instruments will be used before and following treatment at pre-specified interval
Time Frame: Baseline before treatment, 30 days, 6 months, 12 months and at 24 months following treatment
Validate Patient-Reported Questionnaire (International Index of Erectile Function-15, higher scores are better, averages at each specified interval will be taken once all subjects reach the interval and study completion) will be completed by participants throughout the study to assess Health Related Quality of Life.
Baseline before treatment, 30 days, 6 months, 12 months and at 24 months following treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Health Network, Toronto

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Clinical Laserthermia Systems AB

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sangeet Ghai, MD, Director; Biopsy Centre, Abdominal Division and Joint Department of Medical Imaging

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 29, 2018

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 10, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 24, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 28, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 3, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 15-9002

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings