The Pediatric Development Clinic Study (PDC)

September 9, 2019 updated by: Catherine Kirk, Partners in Health

The Pediatric Development Clinic Study: the Development, Medical and Nutritional Outcomes of Children Discharged From the Neonatal Unit in Rural Rwanda

Many preterm, low birth weight and other high-risk infants are surviving the early neonatal period. However, upon discharge from the neonatal units, this at-risk population has little support for their health, nutrition and development in the community. To address this emerging need, Partners In Health in collaboration with the Ministry of Health and UNICEF, has created a pediatric developmental clinic (PDC) to follow the high-risk infants after discharge from hospitals and health centers.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Neonatal health and improving neonatal mortality has become one of the top priorities globally. In Rwanda, hospital care has advanced significantly with the development of national neonatal care guidelines and widespread provider training. As advances in technology and resuscitation become more commonly available, many preterm, low birth weight and other high-risk infants are surviving the early neonatal period. However, upon discharge from the neonatal units, this at-risk population has little support for their health, nutrition and development in the community. To address this emerging need, Partners In Health in collaboration with the Ministry of Health and UNICEF, has created a pediatric developmental clinic (PDC) to follow the high-risk infants after discharge from hospitals and health centers. Prior to implementation, a community-based descriptive study assessing the baseline medical, nutritional and developmental needs of low-birth weight and preterm infants who are the target population of the pediatric development clinic was conducted (Baseline Phase One). Subsequently, after 1-2 years of implementation an evaluation of clinical, nutritional and developmental outcomes of children followed in PDC will be conducted in comparison with the baseline study outcomes (Post-PDC Phase Two). Ongoing research on PDC implementation will focus on research on patient and provider experiences, overall clinic processes, cost-effectiveness, expansion of the PDC model, decentralization to health centers, and longer term outcomes of children enrolled in the PDC to further help refine the PDC model (Post-PDC Phase Three)

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
376

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Rwanda
    • Eastern
      • Kirehe, Eastern, Rwanda
        • Kirehe District Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

1 week to 5 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All under-five children in need of formal follow-up with the following medical condition will be enrolled in PDC

  • children born premature
  • children born with an extremely low birth weight (ELBW)/ very low birth weight (VLBW)
  • infants born at term with HIE or Central Nervous System infections (cerebral malaria and meningitis)
  • children with developmental delays,
  • children with trisomy 21, hydrocephalus, cleft lip/palate
  • children less than 12 months of age discharged from the hospital following malnutrition treatment.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All under-five children meeting PDC referral criteria as described in the study population description will be enrolled in PDC.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who do not meet referral criterial for PDC or who are over age 5 years.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To compare developmental outcomes of children who were enrolled in the PDC to children who did not receive PDC services and to the general population.
Time Frame: April 2014 to March 2019
Proportion of children who are on track developmentally measured by the Ages and Stages Questionnaire Version 3 (ASQ-3) and Caregiver Reported Early Childhood Development Index (CREDI).
April 2014 to March 2019

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To compare nutritional outcomes of children who were enrolled in the PDC to children who did not receive PDC services and to the general population.
Time Frame: April 2014 to March 2019
Proportion of children with normal nutritional status based on anthropometric measures and World Health Organization Growth Standards: weight-for-age (underweight) or weight-for-height (wasting) or length/height-for-age (stunting) z-scores < -2 (undernutrition) vs healthy (z-score >-2).
April 2014 to March 2019

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Partners in Health

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Grand Challenges Canada

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 12, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 12, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 11, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 6, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 11, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 10, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 9, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 222 (Other Grant/Funding Number: MS Society UK)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

Individual children data can only be shared on request according to the Rwandan policy on data sharing. However, study findings will be shared in different meetings, conferences and journals.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings